Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagWashington State Legislature(117)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2024-07-12

    Chapter 53.54 RCW: Aircraft noise abatement

    Chapter 53.54 RCW authorizes Washington port districts operating large airports (such as Sea-Tac) to carry out programs that reduce the impact of jet aircraft noise on surrounding neighborhoods, including purchasing properties, providing soundproofing, and offering transaction assistance to affected homeowners. The law defines 'impacted areas' with specific distance limits from runways and allows properties within those boundaries to receive noise mitigation benefits. Recent 2024 updates expand the program to allow inspection, repair, or replacement of previously installed noise mitigation equipment that is no longer working as intended or has caused structural damage.
    TagsNoise Abatement Procedures, Noise Mitigation, Port Of Seattle, RCW, Washington State LegislatureFolderState
  • U.S. Capitol Building, East Front

    The East Front of the U.S. Capitol Building, seat of the U.S. Congress, photographed on a clear day. The neoclassical structure features its iconic cast-iron dome topped with the Statue of Freedom, with visitors visible on the plaza.
    TagsCongress.gov, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington State LegislatureFolderFederal
  • 2024-05-13

    RCW 47.06.140: Transportation facilities and services of statewide significance—Level of service standards

    RCW 47.06.140 defines transportation facilities and services of statewide significance in Washington State, including highways, the interstate system, ferry routes, freight railroads, and high-capacity transit systems, while explicitly excluding airport facilities and services from this designation. The law requires the Washington State Department of Transportation to set level of service standards for state highways and ferry routes, in consultation with local governments, while retaining final decision-making authority. Improvements to these statewide facilities are classified as essential state public facilities under RCW 36.70A.200.
    Tagsnon-aviation transportation, RCW, transportation, Washington State Legislature, WSDOTFolderSP #2
  • 2024-05-13

    RCW 36.70A.200: Siting of essential public facilities—Limitation on liability

    RCW 36.70A.200 requires counties and cities planning under Washington's Growth Management Act to include a process for identifying and siting essential public facilities — defined as those typically difficult to site, such as airports, state education facilities, regional transportation facilities, correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and inpatient mental health or substance abuse facilities. The law explicitly prohibits any local comprehensive plan or development regulation from completely blocking the siting of such facilities. It also establishes liability protections for jurisdictions acting in good faith to site secure community transition facilities.
    TagsLand Use, Legislation, RCW, State of Washington, Washington State LegislatureFolderSP #2
  • 2024-05-13

    RCW 70.94.037: Transportation activities—”Conformity” determination requirements

    Washington State law RCW 70.94.037 requires that any transportation plan, program, or project in areas that don't meet federal air quality standards must be shown to conform with the state's air quality implementation plan before it can be approved or funded. The conformity determination must be made by the responsible state agency, local government, or metropolitan planning organization overseeing the project. Projects limited strictly to preservation or maintenance work are exempt from this requirement.
    TagsClean Air Act, Conformity, RCW, transportation, Washington State LegislatureFolderSP #2
  • 2024-05-06

    State governance of special purpose districts (ports) and FAA preeminence

    This presentation, prepared for the City of Burien Airport Committee, examines the governance structure of Washington State's special purpose port districts and the FAA's preeminent authority over airport operations. It explains that port districts, enabled by state law since 1911 and governed by directly elected commissioners, hold broad powers including management of airports, while federal FAA regulations take precedence over local planning decisions. The document also touches on noise control considerations relevant to communities near Sea-Tac Airport, referencing state and federal regulatory frameworks.
    TagsBurien Airport Committee, FAA, Port Of Seattle, RCW, Washington State LegislatureFolderSP #1
  • 2024-03-19

    Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5955: Large Port Districts—Aircraft Noise Mitigation

    Washington State's Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5955, signed into law on March 19, 2024, addresses aircraft noise mitigation for large port districts like the Port of Seattle, which operates Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The law allows the port to repair or replace noise mitigation equipment that is no longer functioning properly or has caused structural damage to nearby properties, using non-federal local funding. It also acknowledges that communities of color — including Black, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander residents in King County — are disproportionately impacted by airport noise, and establishes a state partnership to improve equity and responsiveness in noise mitigation efforts.
    TagsLegislation, Noise Mitigation, RCW 53.54.020, SB5955, Sea-Tac Airport, Washington State LegislatureFolderSB5955
  • 2024-03-13

    Final Bill Report: E2SSB 5955 — Mitigating Harm and Improving Equity in Large Port Districts

    Washington State E2SSB 5955 creates the Port District Equity Fund to help large port districts, such as the Port of Seattle, repair or replace failing aircraft noise mitigation equipment in nearby homes and properties. The Department of Commerce administers the grant program, which requires port districts to match at least half of state funding, and mandates annual public reporting on inspections and repairs. The program is set to expire July 1, 2029, with a legislative audit review, and will be fully repealed by July 1, 2030.
    TagsDepartment Of Commerce, Legislation, Noise Mitigation, SB5955, Sea-Tac Airport, Washington State LegislatureFolderSB5955
  • 2024-03-07

    Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5950: Washington State Fiscal Matters Appropriations Act, 2024

    Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5950, passed by the Washington State Legislature on March 7, 2024, is a fiscal appropriations bill that adopts a state budget for the biennium running from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2025. The bill authorizes spending from various state funds for agency salaries, wages, and other specified purposes, while amending several existing statutes related to financial management. Note: This bill addresses general state fiscal matters and does not contain provisions specifically related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    CategoriesLegislation TagsBudget, Legislation, Port Package Program Updates, SB5955, state legislature, State of Washington, UWDEOHS, Washington State LegislatureFolderSB5955
  • 2024-02-21

    Multiple agency fiscal note summary: Bill 5955 E 2S SB, large port districts

    This is a fiscal note summary for Washington State Senate Bill 5955, which concerns large port districts. The document estimates operating expenditures primarily from the Department of Commerce, ranging from approximately $113,104 in the 2023-25 biennium to $114,136 in subsequent biennia, along with capital budget costs starting at $86,586. The Office of State Treasurer notes non-zero but indeterminate cash receipt impacts, while other agencies such as the Department of Revenue and Department of Ecology report no fiscal impact.
    TagsDepartment Of Commerce, local government funding, SB5955, Washington Ports, Washington State LegislatureFolderSB5955

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 … Page 12
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR029214: Port Of Seattle Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Sea-Tac Airport" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V