TagThird Runway(1084)
-
2000-10-20ACC Comments on Draft EIS for Update of Central Puget Sound Region’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (Destination 2030)
In October 2000, attorneys representing the Airport Communities Coalition — comprising the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, along with the Highline School District — submitted formal comments objecting to the Puget Sound Regional Council's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The letter argues that the DEIS violates SEPA requirements by refusing to analyze aviation alternatives, including whether Sea-Tac's controversial third runway project was still justified given changed demand forecasts and its ballooning costs. It also challenges the DEIS for failing to provide current data on aircraft noise impacts, noting that noise contours around Sea-Tac appeared to be growing rather than shrinking as previously forecast. -
2000-10-20EXH AR029018: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 20, 2000
Final draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations held October 20, 2000. Attendees include representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Chung Ki Yee, Erik Stockdale), Port Of Seattle (Michael Cheyne, Elizabeth Leavitt, Keith Smith), King County -
2000-10-18EXH AR023911: Email Luster to Ecology Staff – STIA 401 Certification Requirements & Minority Opinion
In an October 18, 2000 email, Tom Luster of Washington State Department of Ecology shares his draft notes from a discussion about what the Port of Seattle and Ecology must do to meet Section 401 water quality certification requirements related to Sea-Tac Airport. Luster acknowledges that his views represent a minority opinion within the group, but argues his written notes may be clearer than his verbal explanations and could help prepare the agency to respond to similar questions likely to arise during public review. He expresses hope that sharing these notes will help the team reach a legally defensible decision on the 401 certification. -
2000-10-17Exhibit 216: Tom Luster Draft Memo on Adequacy of Ecology’s 401 Review for Proposed Sea-Tac Expansion
In October 2000, Washington State Department of Ecology staff member Tom Luster raised concerns about the adequacy of Ecology's Clean Water Act Section 401 certification review for the proposed Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Luster identified multiple unresolved issues, including insufficient stormwater pollution controls, unevaluated wetland and water quality impacts, and conflicts between Ecology's approach and federal Clean Water Act requirements. He warned that failing to address these issues could result in a legally indefensible permit and degraded water quality in nearby creeks and wetlands. -
2000-10-13Exhibit 215: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 13, 2000
These are the official draft meeting notes from October 13, 2000 negotiations between the Port of Seattle, the Washington Department of Ecology, and King County regarding the 401 Water Quality Permit for Sea-Tac Airport's proposed third runway. The meeting covered technical issues including stormwater management, natural resource mitigation planning, and a master list of permit issues tracked by resolution status. Representatives from multiple agencies worked to resolve outstanding questions about detention sizing, wetland hydrology, and environmental compliance requirements. -
2000-10-13EXH AR029009: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 13, 2000
Final draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations held October 13, 2000. Attendees include representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tom Luster, Erik Stockdale), Port Of Seattle (Michael Cheyne, Elizabeth Leavitt, Keith Smith), King County (Kelly -
2000-10-13EXH AR046165: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Effects on Infiltration and Base Flow, Proposed Third Runway Embankment
Memorandum dated October 13, 2000 from Michael Bailey P.E. and Michael Kenrick P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson P.E. at HNTB (project J-4978-06), analyzing infiltration into the proposed Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport and effects on shallow water-bearing zone base flow to Miller Creek and adjacent wetlands. Analysis uses three sequential models — -
2000-10-10EXH AR029002: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 10, 2000
Final draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Section 401 Permit Negotiations meeting held October 10, 2000, 9:00–4:00. Attendees included representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tom Luster, Chung Ki Yee), Port Of Seattle (Michael Cheyne, Elizabeth Leavitt, Keith -
2000-10-09EXH AR018460: Ecology Internal Memo — Remaining Issues, Sea-Tac Natural Resource Mitigation Plan, October 9, 2000
Internal memo from Erik Stockdale (Ecology) to Tom Luster, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Ray Hellwig, Dave Garland, Joan Marchioro, and Jeannie Summerhays, dated October 9, 2000, summarizing 23 remaining issues with the SeaTac Natural Resource Mitigation Plan (NRMP) for the Third Runway project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Topics include: Ecology review transition and 3rd party wetland consultant -
2000-10-09Exhibit 214: Tom Luster Draft Memo — Sea-Tac 401 Issues List for Ecology Reviewers
A October 9, 2000 internal memo from Tom Luster to Ecology's SeaTac reviewers outlines a draft list of unresolved issues related to the SeaTac Airport 401 water quality certification review. The issues cover stormwater management, streamflows, wetland impacts, and environmental mitigation plans, including concerns about cumulative impacts on Des Moines Creek and Miller Creek from several interconnected proposed projects. The memo notes that some issues may require only minor document clarifications while others may need significant new documentation or development of formal 401 permit conditions.