Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1999-06-29

    Exhibit 026593: Memorandum — Review of Draft De-Icing Dissolved Oxygen Report

    Memorandum from Ken Ludwa of Parametrix, Inc. to Elizabeth Leavitt, dated June 29, 1999, reviewing the Draft De-Icing Dissolved Oxygen Report related to Sea-Tac Airport runway and taxiway acetate washoff. Comments address dissolved oxygen (DO) water quality standards (8 mg/L Class A, 9.5 mg/L Class AA) in Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek, NW Ponds,
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-06-16

    EXH AR024759: Draft BMP Assessment Existing SDS Subbasins — STIA

    A 1999 draft assessment prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Port of Seattle outlines best management practices (BMPs) for managing stormwater runoff at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as part of its Master Plan Upgrades. The document describes how the Port plans to implement water quality treatment measures—including filter strips, bioswales, and wet-vaults—across existing and newly developed stormwater drainage subbasins to meet Washington State Department of Ecology redevelopment requirements. Note that while archived alongside airport planning documents, this report focuses on stormwater and water quality compliance, not noise policy.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-06-13

    Exhibit 2106: ATG MI Sea-Tac Third Runway — Email Chain on Water Quality Standards and 401 Permit Review for Des Moines Creek

    Email chain (AR 033708–033710) among Washington State Department of Ecology staff Paula Ehlers, Tom Luster, and Raymond Hellwig, with ATG staff Tom McDonald and Joan Marchioro, dated June 1–13, 1999, regarding the Port Of Seattle third runway proposal and 401 water quality certification for Des Moines Creek. Discusses antidegradation requirements under Washington Water Quality Standards
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 1999-06-09

    EXH AR023644: Email Chain – Possible Utilization Ecology Contract Services (SAIC) Agreed Order Review STIA

    In a June 1999 email chain, Washington State Department of Ecology staff member Roger Nye proposed bringing in an outside consulting firm (SAIC) to help review technical groundwater studies related to an environmental cleanup agreement (Agreed Order) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). The goal was to add credibility and independence to Ecology's review process, particularly in response to public demands for an independent assessment. Nye also requested that the Port of Seattle agree to cover SAIC's costs as part of the overall project expenses under state cleanup regulations (MTCA).
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-05-28

    EXH AR024752: Ecology Review of SAP/QAPP and WER Guidance for Port Discharges

    These internal communication records from Parametrix, Inc. (dated around May 1999) document discussions between environmental consultants and Washington State Department of Ecology staff regarding sampling and analysis protocols for port discharge outfalls. Key topics include the need for Ecology to review a Site Assessment Plan (SAP) and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) before work commenced, the applicability of clean sampling techniques for measuring copper concentrations in discharge water, and the distribution of draft Water Effluent Regulations (WER) guidance to regional offices for review.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-05-26

    EXH AR023628: Email Chain — Ecology SAIC Contract Request, Third Runway Groundwater Study Funding

    In May 1999, Washington State Department of Ecology staff exchanged emails discussing plans to hire consulting firm SAIC to review groundwater studies at Sea-Tac Airport, with the question of whether the Port of Seattle would fund the work remaining unresolved. The emails also note that state legislation signed by the governor allocated $250,000 to study how construction of Sea-Tac's proposed Third Runway would impact aquifers beneath the airport, a move the Port viewed as an attempt to block the runway project. This created an unusual situation where two separate Ecology divisions were conducting potentially duplicative groundwater modeling studies at the airport for different purposes.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Julia Patterson, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-05-12

    Exhibit 223: Email Thread — Ecology 401 Wetland Mitigation Strategy Near Airport Flight Path, with Cross Creek Article

    A May 1999 email exchange between Washington State Department of Ecology staff discusses wetland mitigation challenges near an airport flight path, referencing a similar case in Petaluma, California where seasonal wetlands were allowed to remain near a municipal airport under strict conditions. The staff propose a framework involving monitoring for hazardous bird activity, defined management options, and contingency plans for replacement wetland sites if the existing mitigation proves unsafe. The emails emphasize that while the goal is to find creative regulatory solutions to approve the project under Section 401, denial remains a possibility if adequate safeguards cannot be agreed upon.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 1999-05-12

    EXH AR033705: Email Chain Re: Sea-Tac Third Runway Wetland Mitigation and Airport Bird Hazard Article

    Email chain dated May 12, 1999 among Raymond Hellwig, Tom Luster, Erik Stockdale, and Paula Ehlers (Washington State Department of Ecology) regarding wetland mitigation strategy for the SeaTac Third Runway project (Port of Seattle). Tom Luster shares a Press Democrat article about Petaluma municipal airport’s Cross Creek subdivision wetland resolution with the FAA, proposing a
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 14
  • 1999-05-02

    EXH AR023758: Internal NWS Email Chain — Turn Basin #3 Duwamish River Habitat Project, Material Disposal at STIA Third Runway Site

    In April–May 1999, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (NWS) staff exchanged emails debating whether to use a Port of Seattle Third Runway construction site as a disposal area for roughly 60,000 cubic yards of excavated material from the Duwamish River Turn Basin #3 habitat restoration project. Officials weighed whether this arrangement could compromise the Corps' impartiality in its pending permit decision for the Third Runway Project, ultimately concluding it would not, since disposal would occur on upland areas outside Corps jurisdiction and King County bore responsibility for finding a disposal site. The collaboration was seen as potentially saving the habitat restoration project up to $200,000 in disposal costs.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Duwamish River, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-05-01

    EXH AR017691: Agreed Order #97TC-N122 — State of Washington Ecology vs. Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport

    Washington State Department of Ecology Agreed Order #97TC-N122 issued to Port Of Seattle for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), pursuant to RCW 70.105D.050(1). Documents hazardous substance releases within the Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA), a half-square-mile southeast quadrant of STIA operational since 1944. Contaminants identified include jet fuel (most abundant by bulk volume), gasoline, industrial
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "18-120 DailyFTMbyFlow_Page_15" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V