TagPort Of Seattle(2611)
-
2001-08-03
EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements
Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International -
2001-08-03
EXH AR018276: Draft 401 Conditions for Port Of Seattle NRMP Auburn Mitigation Site — Memorandum from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny
Deliberative memorandum dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, Inc.) to Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology), transmitting revised draft 401 conditions for the Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan (NRMP) Auburn Mitigation Site. Document 21-1-12020-001-M1 REVISED.doc covers Auburn Mitigation Site revisions including culvert placement issues on June 28, 2001 -
2001-08-03
EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001
Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides -
2001-08-03
EXH AR018283: Email from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny Regarding Fish/Stream Monitoring Plan
Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, regarding fish and stream monitoring recommendations for Port Of Seattle mitigation area. Discusses IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology limitations and augmentation with monitoring of temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality, large woody debris, riparian canopy cover, and fish use. -
2001-08-03
EXH AR023795: PDA Request Low Flow Analysis — Helsell Fetterman to Ecology
In this August 3, 2001 email, Andrea Grad, a paralegal at Helsell Fetterman, submits a Public Disclosure Act (PDA) request to Ann Kenny at the Washington State Department of Ecology. Grad notes that several sections of the Port of Seattle's two-volume Low Flow Analysis — including the Introduction and the section on Determination of Impacts to Streamflow — were either incomplete or entirely missing from the copy provided by Ecology. She asks Ecology to confirm whether the Port had submitted the missing sections, and requests copies of any such materials. -
2001-08-03
Exhibit 2212: Email on Fish/Stream Monitoring Conditions for Port Of Seattle Mitigation
Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, subject fish/stream monitoring. References Richard Brocksmith (fish biologist) and IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology for stream health monitoring. Proposes monitoring condition language for Port Of Seattle requiring monitoring plan covering temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality, -
2001-08-03
EXH AR024388: King County Review Comments Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001
In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources submitted a technical review letter to the Washington Department of Ecology evaluating the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed offset facilities for stormwater management near Sea-Tac Airport. The review found the proposal goes well beyond the basic requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and represents substantial mitigation for low flow impacts in affected drainage basins, including Miller and Walker Creeks. Reviewers noted several inconsistencies and data gaps in the documentation and recommended that a final consolidated document be prepared incorporating all corrections and technical memoranda. -
2001-08-03
EXH AR024406: Water Quality Cert #1996-4-02325 Draft Operational Stormwater Requirements pp.16–17
This August 2001 draft document outlines Water Quality Certification conditions for Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA), requiring the Port of Seattle to implement a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan covering treatment, flow control, and retrofitting of stormwater facilities. Key requirements include obtaining Ecology approval before discharging operational stormwater to state waters, conducting a Water Effects Ratio Study, and ensuring all runoff from impervious surfaces is treated using all known available and reasonable treatment methods. The Port must also retrofit existing stormwater facilities at a rate proportional to new impervious surface construction, with progress documented in quarterly reports. -
2001-08-03
Exhibit 451: Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 Draft — Operational Stormwater Requirements (Pages 16–17)
This August 2001 draft document outlines Water Quality Certification conditions (#1996-4-02325) governing stormwater management at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac). It sets requirements for the Port of Seattle to implement and maintain a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, including retrofitting existing impervious surfaces, meeting state water quality standards, and obtaining Ecology approval before discharging stormwater to receiving waters. The document also addresses scheduling, flow control benchmarks, and the use of all known available and reasonable treatment methods (AKART) for runoff from impervious surfaces. -
2001-08-02
EXH AR022933: Review Comments – Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001
This August 2001 King County review evaluates the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed Flow Impact Offset Facility, which aims to mitigate reductions in stream flows in local creeks—including Des Moines, Miller, and Walker creeks—caused by future airport development. The review finds that while the proposed water storage and augmentation measures substantially offset low-flow impacts during the critical late-summer period, there are significant gaps in documentation, biological assessment, and design details that need to be addressed. Recommendations include professional engineering certification, enhanced biological monitoring, improved calibration documentation, and refinements to the reserve storage facility designs.