Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR018276: Draft 401 Conditions for Port Of Seattle NRMP Auburn Mitigation Site — Memorandum from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny

    Deliberative memorandum dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, Inc.) to Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology), transmitting revised draft 401 conditions for the Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan (NRMP) Auburn Mitigation Site. Document 21-1-12020-001-M1 REVISED.doc covers Auburn Mitigation Site revisions including culvert placement issues on June 28, 2001
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 21
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR018283: Email from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny Regarding Fish/Stream Monitoring Plan

    Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, regarding fish and stream monitoring recommendations for Port Of Seattle mitigation area. Discusses IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology limitations and augmentation with monitoring of temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality, large woody debris, riparian canopy cover, and fish use.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR023795: PDA Request Low Flow Analysis — Helsell Fetterman to Ecology

    In this August 3, 2001 email, Andrea Grad, a paralegal at Helsell Fetterman, submits a Public Disclosure Act (PDA) request to Ann Kenny at the Washington State Department of Ecology. Grad notes that several sections of the Port of Seattle's two-volume Low Flow Analysis — including the Introduction and the section on Determination of Impacts to Streamflow — were either incomplete or entirely missing from the copy provided by Ecology. She asks Ecology to confirm whether the Port had submitted the missing sections, and requests copies of any such materials.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    Exhibit 2212: Email on Fish/Stream Monitoring Conditions for Port Of Seattle Mitigation

    Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, subject fish/stream monitoring. References Richard Brocksmith (fish biologist) and IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology for stream health monitoring. Proposes monitoring condition language for Port Of Seattle requiring monitoring plan covering temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024388: King County Review Comments Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources submitted a technical review letter to the Washington Department of Ecology evaluating the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed offset facilities for stormwater management near Sea-Tac Airport. The review found the proposal goes well beyond the basic requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and represents substantial mitigation for low flow impacts in affected drainage basins, including Miller and Walker Creeks. Reviewers noted several inconsistencies and data gaps in the documentation and recommended that a final consolidated document be prepared incorporating all corrections and technical memoranda.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024406: Water Quality Cert #1996-4-02325 Draft Operational Stormwater Requirements pp.16–17

    This August 2001 draft document outlines Water Quality Certification conditions for Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA), requiring the Port of Seattle to implement a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan covering treatment, flow control, and retrofitting of stormwater facilities. Key requirements include obtaining Ecology approval before discharging operational stormwater to state waters, conducting a Water Effects Ratio Study, and ensuring all runoff from impervious surfaces is treated using all known available and reasonable treatment methods. The Port must also retrofit existing stormwater facilities at a rate proportional to new impervious surface construction, with progress documented in quarterly reports.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    Exhibit 451: Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 Draft — Operational Stormwater Requirements (Pages 16–17)

    This August 2001 draft document outlines Water Quality Certification conditions (#1996-4-02325) governing stormwater management at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac). It sets requirements for the Port of Seattle to implement and maintain a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, including retrofitting existing impervious surfaces, meeting state water quality standards, and obtaining Ecology approval before discharging stormwater to receiving waters. The document also addresses scheduling, flow control benchmarks, and the use of all known available and reasonable treatment methods (AKART) for runoff from impervious surfaces.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-08-02

    EXH AR022933: Review Comments – Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    This August 2001 King County review evaluates the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed Flow Impact Offset Facility, which aims to mitigate reductions in stream flows in local creeks—including Des Moines, Miller, and Walker creeks—caused by future airport development. The review finds that while the proposed water storage and augmentation measures substantially offset low-flow impacts during the critical late-summer period, there are significant gaps in documentation, biological assessment, and design details that need to be addressed. Recommendations include professional engineering certification, enhanced biological monitoring, improved calibration documentation, and refinements to the reserve storage facility designs.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Aircraft arrivals analysis: Progress update" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V