Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-07

    Exhibit 2012: Ecology Memorandum — Review of “Low Flow Analysis, Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Port Of Seattle” by Parametrix Inc., July 2001

    Memorandum dated August 7, 2001 from Dave Garland, NWRO Water Quality Watershed Unit Supervisor, Washington State Department of Ecology, to Ann Kenny, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Ray Hellwig, reviewing Parametrix Inc.’s July 2001 “Low Flow Analysis, Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal” prepared for the Port Of Seattle regarding the proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Reviews
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 11
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH 353: ACC Comment Letter Low Flow Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (§404 Permit, STIA)

    A August 6, 2001 letter from Water Resources Consulting L.L.C. on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition critiques the Port of Seattle's 'Low Flow Analysis - Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal' submitted in support of its Section 404/401 permit application for SeaTac Airport expansion. The letter argues that the Port's plan fails to provide reasonable assurance that the airport's stormwater management will meet water quality standards in Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek. Key concerns include an incomplete and unfinished proposal, insufficient stormwater storage capacity, unproven water quality treatment methods, and reliance on vague future 'adaptive management' rather than concrete, enforceable designs.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-08-06

    Exhibit AR023749: NHC Letter to Ecology re ACC Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Streamflow Analysis, Third Runway

    This August 2001 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, submitted on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises technical concerns about the Port of Seattle's Low Streamflow Analysis for the proposed Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. The letter argues the Port's document is incomplete, inconsistent with the Stormwater Management Plan, and lacks critical design details needed to demonstrate that impacts to low streamflows in Walker, Des Moines, and Miller Creeks will be adequately mitigated. Key issues identified include missing sections in the analysis report, unaddressed impacts from airport expansion activities, conflicting information about proposed storage facilities, and failure to account for water transit losses during dry periods.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-06

    Exhibit 153: Email – Do Not Disclose Deliberative – Katie Walter to Ann Kenny re Port Of Seattle Wetland Mitigation Issues

    Email from Katie Walter (KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny (Ecology), forwarded to Erik Stockdale, dated August 6, 2001, marked ‘Do not Disclose Deliberative’ (AR 018322, DOE 8/13/01 0251). Discusses outstanding issues in a draft permit or approval for Port Of Seattle wetland mitigation, including mitigation ratios, construction oversight team, web site/CD-ROM for document availability, restrictive covenants
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR023086: NHC Letter to Ecology — Technical Review Low Flow Analysis Flow Offset Facility Proposal (Third Runway)

    A technical review letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious concerns about the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Analysis related to the proposed 3rd runway at SeaTac Airport. The letter identifies the July 23, 2001 document as incomplete and inconsistent with other project plans, citing missing sections, absent facility drawings, and unresolved questions about how water storage and release systems would function in practice. Key technical issues flagged include inadequate accounting for water transit losses, potentially impractical small-orifice flow controls, and poor calibration of streamflow models for Walker Creek.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR023128: Letter from Columbia Biological Assessments to Army Corps of Engineers and Ecology re Port Of Seattle Low Flow Analysis/Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    A biological scientist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition reviewed the Port of Seattle's plan to store airport stormwater in detention vaults and release it into Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks during summer low-flow periods. The review found that the plan could worsen water quality in those creeks, because stored sediments may release toxic levels of copper and zinc, and potentially harbor human pathogens from airplane wastewater. The scientist concluded that regulators lacked sufficient information to approve the proposal without further testing, modeling, and independent scientific review.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-05

    EXH AR017930: Ecology Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for Third Runway at STIA — Internal Review Email and Draft Letter

    Email from Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology) dated August 5, 2001, circulating a revised Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the Port Of Seattle’s Third Runway construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Recipients include Gordon White, Raymond Hellwig, Erik Stockdale, Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Dave Garland, Ching-Pi Wang, Katie Walter, Kelly Whiting, Joan
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-05

    EXH AR018284: Ecology Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for Third Runway at STIA — Revised Draft and Attachments

    Email from Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology) dated August 5, 2001, distributing a revised Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the construction of a Third Runway and related projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) in the Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creek watersheds and wetlands in SeaTac and Auburn, King County, Washington. The
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017264: Email Chain RE: Deliberative Draft 401 WQC for Third Runway — Drabek to Kenny

    Email chain between John Drabek and Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology) dated August 3, 2001, regarding a preliminary deliberative draft Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway. Drabek raises question about RCW 90.48 required AKART implementation in NPDES permit reissuances and integration with the 401. Kenny’s original email
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Airport Improvement Program Noise Mitigation Projects Bill" — , 2020

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V