Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-26

    EXH AR026216: Parametrix to US Army Corps Transmittal — STIA MPU Natural Resource Mitigation Responses

    A October 26, 2001 transmittal from Parametrix, Inc. to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) provides responses to the ACOE's request for additional information regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update (MPU) Natural Resource Mitigation project. The package includes maps and aerial photographs identifying wetland areas and acreages within Borrow Area 1, submitted on behalf of the Port of Seattle.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Elizabeth Leavitt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-25

    Exhibit 53: Pre Low Flow Meeting Briefing — King County Review of Port Of Seattle HSPF Hydrologic Modeling

    Email from Kelly Whiting (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, dated October 25, 2001, summarizing a pre-meeting briefing on revised low flow hydrologic modeling related to Port Of Seattle airport embankment impacts. Discusses Hydrocomp (Norm Crawford) independent review findings, HSPF modeling errors including incorrect
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR006328: ACC Statement of Supplemental Authorities in Reply on ACC’s Motion for Reconsideration

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) filing in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, submitting supplemental authorities in reply to ACC’s Motion for Reconsideration and responding to Ecology’s October 22, 2001 submission. Argues AAG statements on a ‘purely legal question’ regarding water rights for the low flow plan fall outside attorney-client
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR026132: Letter to Ecology Requesting Extension Low Streamflow Analysis & Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    In this October 24, 2001 letter, the Port of Seattle notified the Washington Department of Ecology of a mathematical error discovered in hydrological modeling software used to assess the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan's impacts on Miller and Walker Creeks. The error caused stream flow impacts to be overestimated at 1/24th of their actual value, meaning required mitigation facilities could be smaller than originally planned. As a result, the Port requested an extension of the Low Streamflow Analysis submittal deadline from November 5 to November 21, 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-23

    Exhibit 2135: Port Of Seattle Fill Criteria — Processed Materials Specifications for Third Runway Embankment

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 among Ann Kenny (Ecology), Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Ed Abbasi, Raymond Hellwig, Joan Marchioro, Tom Young (ATG), Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), Beth Clark, Paul Agid, Dave Walsh, and Jim Thomson regarding fill criteria under Condition E of the 401 certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 14
  • 2001-10-23

    EXH AR017862: Email Chain — Port Of Seattle Processed Materials Fill Criteria for Third Runway Embankment Specifications

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 between Ann Kenny, Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), Beth Clark, Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Ed Abbasi, Joan Marchioro, Tom Young, Paul Agid, Dave Walsh, and Tim Thomson regarding fill criteria under Condition E of the 401 certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle proposes that
    TagsACC, Construction, Elizabeth Leavitt, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-23

    Exhibit 2058: Port Of Seattle Email on Processed Materials and 401 Fill Criteria for Third Runway Embankment

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, forwarding a message from Beth Clark, discussing which fill materials are subject to Condition E of the 401 water quality certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle proposes that topsoil, utility backfill, and base course
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Elizabeth Leavitt, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 12
  • 2001-10-23

    PCHB Doc 6357: Ecology’s Reply to ACC’s Opposition to Ecology’s Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents

    Washington State Department of Ecology reply brief filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) opposing Airport Communities Coalition’s (ACC) arguments against Ecology’s motion to strike attorney-client privileged documents. Ecology argues the privilege is not ‘at issue’ under Pappas v. Holloway (114 Wn.2d 198) and Hearn v. Rhay (68 F.R.D. 574), and that
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-22

    EXH 306: Email Chain Low Flow Meeting Oct 30 2001 Floyd Snider McCarthy

    This document contains an email chain from October 2001 coordinating a technical meeting among Port of Seattle staff and consultants to discuss low flow modeling issues at Sea-Tac Airport. The meeting, held on October 30, 2001 at Floyd Snider McCarthy's Seattle office, was scheduled to cover a low flow modeling error, revised modeling results and their effects on low flow reserve vaults, and potential additional modeling changes suggested by a Norm Crawford review. Key participants included Port of Seattle Water Resources Manager Keith Smith, consultant Kate Snider, and several other technical staff and engineers.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-19

    EXH AR017661: RE: Low Flow Meeting — Email Chain, October 19, 2001

    Email chain dated October 19, 2001 among Kathryn Snider (Floyd Snider McCarthy, Inc.), Kelly Whiting (Metro King County), Ann Kenny, Keith Smith (Port Of Seattle Water Resources Manager), and David Masters regarding a proposed Low Flow Meeting scheduled for October 30, 2001 at Kate Snider’s office (8:30–11:30 AM). Kelly Whiting requests a meeting agenda or
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) | Los Angeles World Airports" — , 2021

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V