Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2403)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024388: King County Review Comments Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources submitted a technical review letter to the Washington Department of Ecology evaluating the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed offset facilities for stormwater management near Sea-Tac Airport. The review found the proposal goes well beyond the basic requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and represents substantial mitigation for low flow impacts in affected drainage basins, including Miller and Walker Creeks. Reviewers noted several inconsistencies and data gaps in the documentation and recommended that a final consolidated document be prepared incorporating all corrections and technical memoranda.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    Exhibit 2212: Email on Fish/Stream Monitoring Conditions for Port Of Seattle Mitigation

    Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, subject fish/stream monitoring. References Richard Brocksmith (fish biologist) and IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology for stream health monitoring. Proposes monitoring condition language for Port Of Seattle requiring monitoring plan covering temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024406: Water Quality Cert #1996-4-02325 Draft Operational Stormwater Requirements pp.16–17

    This August 2001 draft document outlines Water Quality Certification conditions for Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA), requiring the Port of Seattle to implement a Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan covering treatment, flow control, and retrofitting of stormwater facilities. Key requirements include obtaining Ecology approval before discharging operational stormwater to state waters, conducting a Water Effects Ratio Study, and ensuring all runoff from impervious surfaces is treated using all known available and reasonable treatment methods. The Port must also retrofit existing stormwater facilities at a rate proportional to new impervious surface construction, with progress documented in quarterly reports.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH 1268: King County DNR Letter to Ecology STIA Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources wrote to the Washington Department of Ecology confirming that the Port of Seattle's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan improvements met the technical requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The review found that the plan demonstrated a feasible conceptual strategy for managing stormwater from proposed airport construction projects. Reviewers noted that while the plan showed compliance with design standards, additional oversight and monitoring would be needed as individual projects moved from planning into construction.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 21
  • 2001-08-02

    EXH AR022933: Review Comments – Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    This August 2001 King County review evaluates the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed Flow Impact Offset Facility, which aims to mitigate reductions in stream flows in local creeks—including Des Moines, Miller, and Walker creeks—caused by future airport development. The review finds that while the proposed water storage and augmentation measures substantially offset low-flow impacts during the critical late-summer period, there are significant gaps in documentation, biological assessment, and design details that need to be addressed. Recommendations include professional engineering certification, enhanced biological monitoring, improved calibration documentation, and refinements to the reserve storage facility designs.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 09
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR1278: Sand and Gravel Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan — Third Runway Project Borrow Areas 3 and 4, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Sand and Gravel Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for Port of Seattle, covering Borrow Areas 3 and 4 of the Third Runway Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Prepared August 2001, approved by Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities, Port of Seattle. Document checked by Paul Fendt, P.E. and prepared by Julie
    TagsACC, Construction, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR017820: Email Chain — Ecology Internal Communications on Third Runway Decision Announcement Strategy

    Internal email chain dated August 1, 2001 among Washington Department of Ecology staff Thomas Fitzsimmons, Sheryl Hutchison, Dianne Pastore, and Raymond Hellwig regarding communications strategy around the Sea-Tac Airport third runway decision. Topics include scheduling media availability, coordinating with the governor and Isaki, Port Commission meeting on August 14, E-Board contact timing, press attendance at
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR050792: Supplemental Information — Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands and Streams, STIA Master Plan Update Improvements

    Parametrix, Inc. report prepared for Port Of Seattle on cumulative impacts to wetlands and streams from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update improvements, August 2001 (AR 050792, Exhibit 1267). Covers land use changes in Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek watersheds, wetland inventories, soil survey maps, aerial photograph analysis, stream conditions and fish habitat in
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 21

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 … Page 241
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting September 22, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 22: 12:00pm
    17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158
    2026 09 22 rm packet pdf

    Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 4a. Presentation of

    [...]
  • Highline Forum Agenda – September 23, 2026
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 23, 2:30pm - 4:30pm
    City of Des Moines, Police Services Building,
    Highline forum agenda final 23sept2026 pdf

    Highline Forum Agenda Theme: Part 150 Update and PortJobs Overview 2:30pm – Convene Meeting/Introductions Port Co-Chair, Commissioner Mohamed 2:35pm – Public Comments Audience The meeting will be held in person and virtually. Those wishing to provide public comment may: 1) Deliver public comment via email; 2) Deliver public comment via Microsoft Teams; or 3) Deliver

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "A Letter To Sheila Brush re. Stakeholder Committee Interviews" — , 2019

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V