Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 28: ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification, and/or Partial Reconsideration of Order Publishing Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, seeking correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of the Order Publishing Certain Portions of Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses. Motion identifies three categories of discrepancies: (1)
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law — Ecology and Port Of Seattle v. ACC and CASE

    Respondents’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle in PCHB Case No. 01-160, received May 22, 2002. Document addresses appeal by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) of the §401 Clean Water Act Certification (33 U.S.C. §1341) issued by Ecology
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, hearing held March 18-29, 2002. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appellant and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) intervenor versus Washington State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle respondents. Document presents proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order regarding Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Document addresses Section 401 water quality certification for Sea-Tac Airport third runway project, covering stormwater,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-05-07

    PCHB Doc 03026: Direct Testimony of Kelly Whiting on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Kelly Whiting, Engineer III at King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, submitted on behalf of the Washington State Department of Ecology in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Whiting reviewed the Port of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP)
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-04-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Supplemental Post-Hearing Evidentiary Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Supplemental Post-Hearing Evidentiary Order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Signed by Kaleen Cottingham on April 22, 2002. Supplements the April 9, 2002 evidentiary order by declaring that
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Denying ACC’s Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160 denying Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to redact portions of pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt. ACC argued the testimony violated the February 28, 2002 discovery cut-off order by including discussions and work on the Low Flow Plan conducted between February 12 and February 19, 2002,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-18

    EXH AR001887: ACC Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Reply memorandum filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, in support of ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed direct testimony of Port of Seattle expert Paul Fendt regarding Walker Creek low flow frequencies. ACC argues that Fendt’s opinions and the March 2002
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-04-17

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Redact Testimony of Paul Fendt, P.E.

    Port Of Seattle response filed in PCHB case 01-160 opposing ACC’s (Airport Communities Coalition) motion to redact testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E., and strike Exhibit C. Port argues Walker Creek low flow period calculations and Exhibit C were prepared before the February 19, 2002 meeting with Kelly Whiting and before the February 28, 2002
    TagsACC, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-04-17

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Fifth Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E.

    Fifth Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. (AR 001896-001897), filed in PCHB case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Declarant is a Port Of Seattle consultant addressing the December 2001 Low Flow Plan, Walker Creek low flow period calculations, and meetings with Ecology’s Kelly Whiting on February 12
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 … Page 185
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "GreenerSkies Appendix C affected approach procedures" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V