Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-05

    More SeaTac email notes on 401/Agreed Order/Governor’s certification letter

    Tom Luster’s self-addressed email memo documenting a phone call from Ann Kenny regarding the 401 water quality certification, Agreed Order, and Governor’s certification letter related to Sea-Tac Airport’s third runway. Kenny indicates Ecology intends to separate the 401 from the Agreed Order and pursue ‘reasonable assurance’ through a new study examining possible contamination pathways from
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-05

    EXH AR029182: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Technical Meeting Notes, June 5, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for a 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meeting on June 5, 2001 regarding Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Alan Black (HNTB), Paul Fendt and Tom Atkins (Parametrix).
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-05

    Verbatim Report Of Proceedings: Port Of Seattle v. RST Enterprises, Inc. And King County

    This is a verbatim report of court proceedings held on June 5, 2001, before Judge Dean S. Lum in King County Superior Court. The case involves Port Of Seattle as petitioner against RST Enterprises, Inc. and King County as respondents. The proceedings include examination of witnesses James C. Kelley, Ph.D. and Jack Dodge, with attorneys
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-04

    EXH AR017293: Ecology Internal Emails — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification, Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Internal deliberative emails from Kevin Fitzpatrick (NWRO Water Quality Program Section Manager) to Chung K. Yee, Ann Kenny, Ching-Pi Wang, and others at Washington State Department of Ecology regarding development of acceptable clean fill criteria language for the 401 Water Quality Certification for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway (Sea-Tac Master Plan Improvements project). Emails reference
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-04

    EXH AR017665: PDA Request for 1999 Parametrix Report — Correspondence Between Andrea Grad and Ann Kenny

    Email correspondence (June 4, 2001) from Andrea Grad, paralegal at Helsell Fetterman, to Ann Kenny at Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY), following up on a Public Disclosure Act (PDA) request for Parametrix’s 1999 draft report titled ‘Water Effects Ratio Screening Study of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: Toxicity Evaluation of Site Water.’ The Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-01

    EXH AR017746: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Email chain (June 1, 2001) from Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager, Water Quality Program NWRO, to Ann Kenny and Ching-Pi Wang, cc Raymond Hellwig and Steve Alexander (Ecology), forwarding deliberative draft language for clean fill criteria in the 401 Certification for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway construction. Includes August 24, 2000 email from Fitzpatrick to Tom Luster
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-05-31

    Exhibit 2048: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter on STIA Master Plan Update Improvements — Chinook Salmon and Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region to FAA Airport Division Manager Lowell H. Johnson (NMFS No. WSB-00-318) concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2), and finding STIA projects ‘not likely to adversely
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR050568: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements, Chinook Salmon ESA Section 7 Consultation and Essential Fish Habitat

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region (Seattle, WA) to Lowell H. Johnson, FAA Airport Division Manager, concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2001-05-31

    Biological Assessment for Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (NMFS No. WSB-00-318) and Essential Fish Habitat consultation

    A letter from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to the Federal Aviation Administration concurring with the Biological Assessment’s determination that Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update projects ‘may affect but are not likely to adversely affect’ threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon or designated critical habitat. The letter covers ESA Section 7 consultation and Essential
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-05-30

    EXH AR017714: Email and Redline Revisions to Preferential Flowpath Technical Memorandum — Third Runway Construction

    Email from Ching-Pi Wang (Port Of Seattle) to Paul Agid, cc Roger Nye, dated May 30, 2001, transmitting redline edits to the May 8th draft of the preferential ground-water flowpath technical memorandum related to construction of the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Attached redlined memorandum (From Port to Ecology, May 30, 2001) addresses preferential flowpaths
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Getting rid of remote work will take more than a downturn" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V