Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise Pollution(31)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2023-08-22

    Airport construction slowed by ecology laws, says E.P.A. official

    An EPA official warned that environmental and ecology laws have slowed the construction and expansion of new airports across the United States. Stanley M. Greenfield, assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, stated that airports generate significant noise, air, and water pollution, and that surrounding industrial and residential growth creates a 'vicious cycle' of expensive, hard-to-solve problems. He called for a comprehensive national program for aircraft noise abatement, noting that complete technological control of aircraft noise at the source was not yet available.
    TagsAirport Expansion, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, Noise PollutionFolderNewspapers
  • 2023-06-27

    Noise policy review

    The FAA's Noise Policy Review examines the growing problem of aircraft noise around airports, comparing historical and current annoyance levels among nearby residents. A Neighborhood Environmental Survey found a substantial increase in the percentage of people highly annoyed by aircraft noise, with annoyance rising consistently across all levels of noise exposure — well above what older models like the Schultz Curve had predicted.
    TagsDNL65, FAA, Noise Complaints, Noise PollutionFolderFAA
  • 2023-06-15

    Quiet Communities Act of 2023 (H.R. 4178)

    H.R. 4178, the Quiet Communities Act of 2023, is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on June 15, 2023, that seeks to reestablish the EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control, which has received no funding since 1982. The bill highlights the serious health impacts of noise pollution — including hearing loss, cardiovascular disorders, sleep deprivation, and learning deficits in children — affecting millions of Americans exposed to noise from aircraft, vehicular traffic, and other sources. Because the EPA remains legally responsible for enforcing noise regulations while lacking an active office to do so, and because federal law limits state and local governments from regulating many noise sources, the bill argues that noise abatement programs across the country have effectively lain dormant.
    TagsEnvironmental Protection Agency, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet CommunitiesFolderFederal
  • 2023-06-07

    Quiet Communities, Inc. v. EPA: Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

    A 2023 federal lawsuit filed against the EPA argues that the agency has ignored its legal duties under the Noise Control Act for over 40 years, ever since it shut down its noise regulation offices in 1982. The plaintiffs, a nonprofit noise-reduction organization and an affected Massachusetts resident, are asking the court to force the EPA to resume studying and regulating noise pollution as Congress originally required. While not specific to Sea-Tac Airport, the case has broad implications for communities nationwide suffering from unregulated noise pollution, including airport noise.
    TagsEPA, Noise Control Act of 1972, Noise Pollution, Quiet CommunitiesFolderQuiet Communities
  • 2023-04-26

    Mitigation of aircraft noise-induced vascular dysfunction and oxidative stress by exercise, fasting, and pharmacological α1AMPK activation: molecular proof of a protective key role of endothelial α1AMPK against environmental noise exposure

    A scientific study found that aircraft noise exposure causes measurable damage to blood vessel function and increases harmful oxidative stress in mice, mimicking cardiovascular risks seen in human populations living near airports. Researchers demonstrated that three interventions — regular physical exercise, intermittent fasting, and a drug that activates a protective enzyme called α1AMPK — can each effectively prevent or reduce this noise-induced vascular damage. These findings suggest that lifestyle changes like exercise and dietary restriction may offer practical, evidence-based strategies for mitigating the cardiovascular health risks associated with aircraft noise exposure.
    TagsAcademic Journals, Health, Noise Mitigation, Noise Pollution, Thomas MünzelFolderStudies
  • Please Get Your Noise Out of My Ears

    https://seatacnoise.info/wp-content/uploads/Freakonomics_Radio-Please%20Get%20Your%20Noise%20Out%20of%20My%20Ears.mp3 “Please Get Your Noise Out of My Ears” from Freakonomics Radio by ​Dubner Productions and Stitcher. Released: 2020. Genre: Podcast.
    Tagseducation, Freakonomics Radio, Noise, Noise Mitigation, Noise PollutionFolderNoise
  • From Lawn Mowers To Rock Concerts, Our ‘Deafening World’ Is Hurting Our Ears

    Public Health Heard on Fresh Air Dave Davies Download Transcript Harsh ambient sound from even small household appliances, such as food processors and hair dryers, can reach levels that lead to permanent damage, hearing specialists say. Our ears are complicated, delicate instruments that largely evolved in far quieter times than the age we currently inhabit
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsFresh Air, Health, Hearing Loss, Noise Pollution, NPR
  • 2019-04-01

    Beacon Hill Community Noise Team Fact Sheet

    The Beacon Hill Community Noise Team is a Seattle resident group that documented excessive noise pollution from Sea-Tac and King County airports, as well as road traffic, across 52 neighborhood sites in 2018. Their measurements found that more than half of recorded noise levels exceeded FAA mitigation thresholds, Seattle city ordinances, and EPA public health standards by up to 800%. The group is calling on local, state, and federal officials to take action, citing compounding health and socioeconomic burdens already faced by Beacon Hill's nearly 40,000 residents.
    TagsBeacon Hill, KCIA, Noise Pollution, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderSeattle
  • 2019-01-15

    Burien Airport Committee agenda and draft minutes, January 15, 2019

    The Burien Airport Committee met on January 15, 2019 to review and update three proposed city resolutions addressing growth and safety, noise pollution, and health impacts related to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The committee also discussed a proposed resolution to restructure its own membership by removing the distinction between business and resident members and adding ex-officio seats for representatives from other airport-related groups. Additional agenda items included an update on open applications to fill vacant committee seats.
    TagsBAC, Burien Airport Committee, City of Burien, Noise Pollution, Sea-Tac AirportFolder2019
  • 2019-01-07

    Resolution No. 407 addressing noise pollution generated by Sea-Tac Airport

    In January 2019, the City of Burien, Washington considered Resolution No. 407, a measure drafted by the Burien Airport Committee to address noise pollution from nearby Sea-Tac Airport. The resolution highlighted that the airport's rapid growth had caused serious health, environmental, and economic harm to Burien residents, with current FAA noise level standards far exceeding the safer thresholds recommended by the World Health Organization. The Burien Airport Committee recommended adoption of the resolution, which called for updated noise impact assessments and greater consideration of off-site noise effects.
    TagsBurien Airport Committee, City of Burien, Noise Pollution, Part 150, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBurien

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V