TagEPA(118)

This is a legal answer filed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in federal court responding to a lawsuit brought by Quiet Communities, Inc. over noise control enforcement. The EPA admits that its Office of Noise Abatement and Control was shut down in 1982, but largely denies or declines to respond to the plaintiffs' other factual and legal claims. The case centers on whether the EPA has failed to fulfill its duties under the Noise Control Act, which is relevant to ongoing debates about airport and environmental noise policy.

An EPA official warned that environmental and ecology laws have slowed the construction and expansion of new airports across the United States. Stanley M. Greenfield, assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, stated that airports generate significant noise, air, and water pollution, and that surrounding industrial and residential growth creates a 'vicious cycle' of expensive, hard-to-solve problems. He called for a comprehensive national program for aircraft noise abatement, noting that complete technological control of aircraft noise at the source was not yet available.

A 2023 federal lawsuit filed against the EPA argues that the agency has ignored its legal duties under the Noise Control Act for over 40 years, ever since it shut down its noise regulation offices in 1982. The plaintiffs, a nonprofit noise-reduction organization and an affected Massachusetts resident, are asking the court to force the EPA to resume studying and regulating noise pollution as Congress originally required. While not specific to Sea-Tac Airport, the case has broad implications for communities nationwide suffering from unregulated noise pollution, including airport noise.

An EPA official warned in the early 1970s that environmental laws were slowing the construction and expansion of airports across the U.S., even as air travel demand was projected to double by 1980. Dr. Stanley Greenfield highlighted that airports create both direct pollution — including noise, air, and water contamination — and indirect impacts through the industrial and residential growth they attract nearby. He called for a comprehensive national program to address aircraft-airport noise, while acknowledging that the technology to fully eliminate aircraft noise at its source was not yet available.