Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-27

    RE: Acceptable fill criteria language for Draft 401 Certification

    An internal email chain from Washington State Department of Ecology staff discussing recommended language for fill material criteria in a Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Peter Kmet recommends using Table 749-3 ecological screening values, requiring the uppermost 6 feet of fill to be clean natural soil, and applying WAC
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-27

    RE: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification

    An email chain between Washington State Department of Ecology staff discussing acceptable fill criteria language for a Draft 401 Certification related to the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Peter Kmet recommends language addressing potential impacts on plants and animals from fill material, including use of Table 749-3 chemical screening values, bioassay testing alternatives, and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-27

    RE: Acceptable fill criteria language for draft 401 certification

    An internal email from Peter Kmet to Kevin Fitzpatrick recommending language for a 401 Certification regarding acceptable fill criteria for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. The email outlines four elements for ensuring fill material would not cause adverse impacts on plants and animals, including chemical testing requirements, bioassay testing, a clean soil buffer
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-26

    Exhibit 2134 AR034353: Draft 401 Certification — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Third Runway Embankment

    Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick, cc Craig E. Thompson and Ann Kenny, dated June 26, 2001, transmitting draft fill criteria language for a 401 Certification related to the Port Of Seattle Third Runway embankment project. Fill criteria are based on Method A table, 3-phase model protection of ground water and surface water,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-26

    Acceptable fill criteria language for draft 401 certification

    An internal email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick, with a draft document attached, discussing fill criteria language for a 401 water quality certification related to the proposed Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport. The fill criteria are based on Method A table, 3-phase model protection of ground water and surface water, PQL, natural
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-26

    SeaTac Third Runway embankment fill criteria email and draft

    An email from Chung K. Yee to Craig E. Thompson and Kevin Fitzpatrick transmitting draft fill criteria requirements for the 401 Water Quality Certification for the SeaTac Third Runway embankment project. The email summarizes the basis for fill criteria developed using Amended MTCA, including Method A soil cleanup levels, three-phase model calculations for ground water
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-25

    EXH AR029190: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis, June 25, 2001

    Final meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway project, covering Low Flow Analysis discussions held June 25, 2001. Attendees included representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny, John Drabeck), King County (Kelly Whiting), Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-25

    401 Permit Decision-Making Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway: Low Flow Analysis Meeting Notes

    Final meeting notes from a June 25, 2001 session on low flow analysis for the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Decision-Making process. The meeting covered methodology for evaluating modeling results to determine stream flow impacts and mitigation requirements, vault filling estimates, slice model status, and non-hydrologic effects. Modeling results were not yet available
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-25

    Memorandum: Modeled Area and Hydrus Model Results Draft Interim Deliverables

    A June 25, 2001 memorandum from Charles Ellingson of Pacific Groundwater Group to Keith Smith of Port Of Seattle presenting draft interim deliverables for Hydrus/Slice modeling of third runway fill at Sea-Tac Airport. The memo defines areas to be modeled by Hydrus/Slice instead of HSPF in the Miller Creek and Walker Creek basins, calculates effective
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin Plan
  • 2001-06-25

    Follow-up comments on stormwater, hydrology, and hydraulics aspects of proposed 3rd runway and related development actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition, provides follow-up comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology on stormwater, hydrology, and hydraulics aspects of the proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter responds to the Port of Seattle’s April 30, 2001 responses to earlier NHC comments
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Another airport isn’t the answer to the region’s transportation needs" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V