EXH AR021830: GeoSyntec Letter — ACC Response to Comments, West MSE Wall Seismic Stability, Third Runway

GeoSyntec Consultants, hired by the Airport Communities Coalition, wrote to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology in June 2001 raising serious technical concerns about the proposed Third Runway Expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter challenges the Port of Seattle's geotechnical analysis for the West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall, arguing that soil strength testing was insufficient, the extent of liquefiable material may have been underestimated, and seismic stability analyses were being performed incorrectly. GeoSyntec concluded that the Port had not yet demonstrated the wall could be safely and economically constructed to withstand potential seismic loads without unacceptable deformation.

Notes

GeoSyntec Consultants letter dated 22 June 2001, authored by Patrick C. Lucia Ph.D. P.E. G.E. and Edward Kavazanjian Jr. Ph.D. P.E. G.E., submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch (Muffy Walker/Gail Terzi) and Washington State Department of Ecology Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program (Ann Kenny), on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Responds to Port Of Seattle’s April 30, 2001 reply to GeoSyntec’s February 16, 2001 letter regarding the West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall and embankment fill for the Third Runway Expansion Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Key concerns: insufficient laboratory strength testing of foundation soils, underestimated extent of liquefiable material, incorrect seismic stability analyses, inadequate documentation for regulatory decision, and unconservative use of shear strength at 20% strain vs. 10% strain. Addresses Comments 1B, 2, 3, and 4 on MSE wall size, cone penetration test correlations, and static/seismic factor of safety. Administrative Record number AR021830.

V V