Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-22

    TCP recommendations for 401 certification

    A memorandum from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny outlining three Toxics Cleanup Program (TCP) recommendations for 401 certification related to Sea-Tac Airport. The recommendations address monitoring contaminant transport via subsurface utility lines, maintaining and updating a contaminant database and maps, and collecting environmental data from construction and cleanup activities throughout the airport.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 2043: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification and Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Memo dated June 22, 2001 from Ching-Pi Wang (Toxics Cleanup Program, TCP) to Ann Kenny regarding TCP recommendations for 401 certification related to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Three recommendations: (1) Port of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant transport to soil and groundwater via
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-22

    GeoSyntec Consultants Response to Port Of Seattle Comments on February 16, 2001 Letter

    GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition, responds to the Port of Seattle’s April 30, 2001 comments regarding their earlier technical review of the Third Runway Expansion Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter addresses concerns about the West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall, including insufficient laboratory strength testing, potential underestimation of liquefiable materials,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-21

    EXH AR050665: Ecology & Port Of Seattle Letter to Army Corps of Engineers Extending Coastal Zone Management Consistency Review Deadline

    Letter dated June 21, 2001 from Jeannie Summerhays (Washington Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office) and Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle, Aviation Environmental Programs, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport) to Tom Mueller, Chief, Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch. Pursuant to 15 CFR § 930.60, Ecology and the Port Of Seattle mutually
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, Foster Pepper, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-21

    Record of telecon from Ann Kenny

    A brief telephone conversation record dated June 21, 2001, noting that Port has agreed to pay for new scope and minor plan sheet changes, with instructions to provide this in writing to ‘Jim’. The memo also references a July 9th Low Flow meeting, potential involvement of Parametrix, setting up a meeting with Corps, and focusing
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-20

    Rebuttal to Port Of Seattle’s Response to 401/404 Comments

    A letter from John A. Strand, Ph.D. of Columbia Biological Assessments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology, rebutting the Port of Seattle’s responses to comments on the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The rebuttal focuses on the Miller Creek Relocation Project, arguing that the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-20

    Rebuttal to Port Of Seattle’s Response to 401/404 Comments

    A letter from John A. Strand, Ph.D. of Columbia Biological Assessments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology, rebutting the Port of Seattle’s responses to 401/404 permit comments regarding the Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The rebuttal focuses on the Miller Creek Relocation Project, arguing that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-19

    RE: Acceptable fill criteria language for draft 401 certification

    Email chain between Washington State Department of Ecology staff discussing the development of acceptable fill criteria language for the 401 Water Quality Certification related to the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. The correspondence clarifies that Ecology’s fill criteria should ‘stand alone’ from US Fish and Wildlife Service requirements in its Biological Opinion, while avoiding
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR050641: Draft Technical Memorandum — Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Draft technical memorandum prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI, Project No. BV99122C) for Port Of Seattle, dated June 19, 2001, analyzing preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Responds to Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) request regarding whether contaminated ground water below the Aviation Operations
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR1255: FAA Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on Third Runway — New Technologies, MSE Wall, and Section 106 Activities

    FAA Northwest Mountain Region letter dated June 19, 2001, from FAA to Ms. Muffy Walker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch Seattle District Office, following up on May 31, 2001 letter. Addresses three issues raised in April 30, 2001 Memorandum for the Record regarding the Port of Seattle third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Curved Bridge at Night with City Lights" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V