Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 2043: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification and Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Memo dated June 22, 2001 from Ching-Pi Wang (Toxics Cleanup Program, TCP) to Ann Kenny regarding TCP recommendations for 401 certification related to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Three recommendations: (1) Port of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant transport to soil and groundwater via
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-22

    EXH AR021830: GeoSyntec Letter — ACC Response to Comments, West MSE Wall Seismic Stability, Third Runway

    GeoSyntec Consultants, hired by the Airport Communities Coalition, wrote to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology in June 2001 raising serious technical concerns about the proposed Third Runway Expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter challenges the Port of Seattle's geotechnical analysis for the West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall, arguing that soil strength testing was insufficient, the extent of liquefiable material may have been underestimated, and seismic stability analyses were being performed incorrectly. GeoSyntec concluded that the Port had not yet demonstrated the wall could be safely and economically constructed to withstand potential seismic loads without unacceptable deformation.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, EIS, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 73: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification — Port Of Seattle Third Runway

    Memorandum from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny (cc: Ray Hellwig, Roger Nye, John Wietfeld, Steve Alexander) dated June 22, 2001, outlining Toxics Cleanup Program (TCP) recommendations for 401 certification related to the Port Of Seattle Third Runway project. Three recommendations: (1) Port Of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-21

    EXH AR050665: Ecology & Port Of Seattle Letter to Army Corps of Engineers Extending Coastal Zone Management Consistency Review Deadline

    Letter dated June 21, 2001 from Jeannie Summerhays (Washington Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office) and Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle, Aviation Environmental Programs, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport) to Tom Mueller, Chief, Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch. Pursuant to 15 CFR § 930.60, Ecology and the Port Of Seattle mutually
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, Foster Pepper, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-21

    EXH AR018374: Record of Telecon with Ann Kenny Regarding Scope Changes, Low Flow Meeting, and Parametrix

    Record of telecon dated 6-21-01, call from Ann Kenny. Notes that Port has agreed to pay for new scope and minor plan sheet changes. Jim to be given confirmation in writing. July 9th Low Flow meeting scheduled. Parametrix involvement noted — panel 6 may be larger with potential impact. Meeting with Corps to be set
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Handwritten Notes, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-20

    EXH AR023116: Rebuttal to Response to 401/404 Comments, Miller Creek Relocation Project, STIA Master Plan Update

    A biologist from Columbia Biological Assessments submitted a rebuttal in June 2001 challenging the Port of Seattle's environmental justifications for proposed construction improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter argues that the Port failed to adequately assess impacts on Miller Creek, particularly regarding fish habitat, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen levels in a relocated section of the creek. The author contends that no proper baseline survey of fish and aquatic life was conducted, making regulatory approval of the project scientifically premature.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-20

    EXH AR021386: Rebuttal to Response to 401/404 Comments, Miller Creek Relocation & Master Plan Update, STIA

    A biologist with Columbia Biological Assessments submitted a formal rebuttal in June 2001 challenging the Port of Seattle's environmental responses related to proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The rebuttal argues that the Port failed to adequately assess impacts on Miller Creek, particularly regarding fish habitat, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen levels during summer months. The author contends that no proper baseline survey of fish and aquatic organisms was conducted, making regulatory approval and proposed mitigation measures scientifically insufficient.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-19

    Exhibit 76: Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Draft technical memorandum prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI, Project No. BV99122C) for Port Of Seattle, dated June 19, 2001, analyzing preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Evaluates potential contaminant migration from the Aviation Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA) to the third runway construction
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR17302: Email Chain RE: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification

    Email chain (AR017302) among Washington State Department of Ecology staff Chung K. Yee, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Craig Thompson, and AAG Joan Marchioro regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Key issues include: whether Ecology’s 401 WQ Certification fill criteria should ‘stand alone’ from
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR050641: Draft Technical Memorandum — Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Draft technical memorandum prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI, Project No. BV99122C) for Port Of Seattle, dated June 19, 2001, analyzing preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Responds to Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) request regarding whether contaminated ground water below the Aviation Operations
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR024560: Internal Email — Upstream Compliance Data, Miller Creek & Des Moines Creek" — , 1999

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V