Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-10-24

    EXH AR017782: RE: Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Ann Kenny / Rachel McCrea Email Exchange

    Email exchange dated October 24, 2000 between Ann Kenny (Ecology NWRO, 425-649-4310) and Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider, Inc. regarding Third Runway 401 permit negotiations with Port Of Seattle. McCrea informs Kenny she will be replacing Tom Luster in the 401 permit negotiations and provides meeting notes (3rw-401 100200, 100600, 101000, 101300, 102000). Upcoming
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-23

    EXH AR018385: Internal Email from Tom Luster re 3rd Runway 401/404 Review Issues — NPDES, Des Moines Creek, Lagoon #3, Tyee Pond

    Internal email chain dated October 23, 2000 from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Joan Marchioro (ATG), forwarded November 20, 2000 to Thomas Fitzsimmons, concerning 401/404 review of SeaTac airport Third Runway expansion. Luster raises unresolved issues including: NPDES major modification and stormwater plan approval for SR-509 interchange as prerequisite
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-20

    Exhibit 2206: Hart Crowser Memorandum on Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 Wetland Preservation

    Memorandum dated October 20, 2000 from Michael A.P. Kenrick, P.E. and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson at HNTB Boston, regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland preservation (project J-4978-06). Document provides conceptual design for a proposed drainage swale to protect wetlands in Borrow Area 3 located south of Sea-Tac
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR046062: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 Preservation of Wetlands

    Memorandum dated October 20, 2000 from Michael A.P. Kenrick, P.E., and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson at HNTB (project J-4978-06), prepared for Port Of Seattle regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland preservation. Reviews hydrology sustaining Wetlands 29, B9, 30, B7, B6, and B5 in Borrow Area 3, located
    TagsACC, Environment, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR023559: Letter Water Resources Consulting (Peter Willing PhD) re SEPA DNS Sea-Tac Aircraft Hydrant Fueling System

    In a October 2000 letter to the Port of Seattle, Water Resources Consulting LLC — writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition — raised concerns about the SeaTac Aircraft Hydrant Fueling System project, arguing that construction should be delayed until an ongoing groundwater contamination study under the Model Toxics Control Act was completed. The letter criticized the project's environmental review (Declaration of Nonsignificance) for lacking specific details about leak detection, operating pressures, and contaminated soil management. The consultant warned that deep utility trenching could create preferential flow paths for existing fuel contaminant plumes, potentially threatening the groundwater supplies relied upon by nearby communities.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPAFolderBox 10
  • 2000-10-20

    ACC Comments on Draft EIS for Update of Central Puget Sound Region’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (Destination 2030)

    In October 2000, attorneys representing the Airport Communities Coalition — comprising the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, along with the Highline School District — submitted formal comments objecting to the Puget Sound Regional Council's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The letter argues that the DEIS violates SEPA requirements by refusing to analyze aviation alternatives, including whether Sea-Tac's controversial third runway project was still justified given changed demand forecasts and its ballooning costs. It also challenges the DEIS for failing to provide current data on aircraft noise impacts, noting that noise contours around Sea-Tac appeared to be growing rather than shrinking as previously forecast.
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, PSRC, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • Psrc comments deis destination 2030 pdf
    2000-10-20

    ACC Comments on Draft EIS for Update of Central Puget Sound Region’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (Destination 2030)

    In October 2000, attorneys representing the Airport Communities Coalition — comprising the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, along with the Highline School District — submitted formal comments objecting to the Puget Sound Regional Council's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The letter argues that the DEIS violates SEPA requirements by refusing to analyze aviation alternatives, including whether Sea-Tac's controversial third runway project was still justified given changed demand forecasts and its ballooning costs. It also challenges the DEIS for failing to provide current data on aircraft noise impacts, noting that noise contours around Sea-Tac appeared to be growing rather than shrinking as previously forecast.
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, PSRC, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR029018: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 20, 2000

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations held October 20, 2000. Attendees include representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Chung Ki Yee, Erik Stockdale), Port Of Seattle (Michael Cheyne, Elizabeth Leavitt, Keith Smith), King County
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR017259: STIA Construction Site Stormwater Monitoring Reports, 10/16/2000 and 10/20/2000

    STIA Construction Site Stormwater Monitoring reports dated 10/16/2000 and 10/20/2000, samplers JL/RS and JB/RS. AR017259–AR017261. Documents turbidity and pH measurements at multiple construction sites including Logistics Site Development (unnamed catch basin, Tyee Pond, IWS Lagoon 3), MWS Lagoon 3 Construction treatment facility, Airfield Improvement (construction staging area, SDS-7, SDS-6, SDS3-594), Dobbs Flight Kitchen Remodel (SDE4-611,
    TagsACC, Construction, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, SR509, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR046044: Sea-Tac Third Runway – Borrow Area 3 Preservation of Wetlands Memorandum

    Memorandum dated October 20, 2000 from Michael A.P. Kenrick, P.E. and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson of HNTB regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland preservation, project J-4978-06, prepared for Port Of Seattle. Covers hydrology sustaining Wetlands 29, B9, 30, B7, B6, and B5 in Borrow Area 3, including
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V