Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-05-31

    Ecology’s response to ACC’s motion for correction, clarification and reconsideration of Board’s decision publishing portions of depositions

    The Washington State Department of Ecology concurs with and joins the Port of Seattle’s response to the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion regarding the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s decision to publish portions of depositions. The document is a brief legal filing in PCHB No. 01-160, signed by Assistant Attorneys General on behalf of Ecology. It was
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-30

    Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order proposed by ACC and CASE

    This document is a proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington in PCHB No. 01-160. The case involves the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as appellants against the State of Washington Department of Ecology and the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-22

    Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order proposed by ACC and CASE

    This document presents the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed order from a hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160). The case involves the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) as appellants challenging the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-22

    ACC’s motion to the board for correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of order publishing certain portions of depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) moves the Pollution Control Hearings Board to correct, clarify, and/or partially reconsider its Order Publishing Certain Portions of Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses. ACC identifies three categories of discrepancies: instances where the Order mischaracterizes testimony as admitted or excluded, instances where excerpts were carved out creating
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-22

    Respondents’ proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law

    Joint proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle to the Pollution Control Hearings Board in case No. PCHB 01-160. The case concerns the §401 Clean Water Act certification issued by Ecology for the Port of Seattle’s Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-07

    Direct testimony of Kelly Whiting submitted on behalf of the Department of Ecology

    Kelly Whiting, a Senior Engineer at King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, provides direct testimony before the Pollution Control Hearings Board regarding the Port of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan improvements. Whiting reviewed both the SMP and the Port’s Low Flow Impact Analysis on behalf of
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-07

    ACC’s notice of withdrawal of Issue No. 20 (Gilliam Creek)

    The Airport Communities Coalition formally withdraws Issue No. 20 from the Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding, PCHB No. 01-160. The withdrawn issue questioned whether reasonable assurance existed that Section 401 and applicable water quality law would not be violated if the Certification did not address water quality impacts to Gilliam Creek. A certificate of service
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-22

    Supplemental post hearing evidentiary order – PCHB 01-160

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington issued a supplemental post-hearing evidentiary order in the case of Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The order clarifies that duplicate exhibits share the same admissibility status as their counterparts, correcting
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-22

    Order denying ACC’s motion to redact

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board denied the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion to redact portions of pre-filed testimony by Paul Fendt. The motion was based on the Board’s earlier discovery cut-off date of February 28, 2002, but the Board found the testimony in question related to work conducted before the cut-off that was simply delivered late.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-18

    ACC’s reply memorandum in support of motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed this reply memorandum supporting its motion to redact testimony from Port of Seattle expert Paul Fendt regarding low flow frequencies in Walker Creek. ACC argues that Fendt’s opinions and a March 2002 Walker Creek chart were not timely disclosed to appellants prior to the discovery cutoff, violating CR 26(e)(1)(B)
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH0512023082" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V