Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-09-05

    [Proposed] Order disposing of Port Of Seattle’s petition for reconsideration regarding Condition 8 of final order

    This document is a proposed order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington disposing of the Port of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration regarding Condition 8 of a final order in PCHB No. 01-160. The Port of Seattle filed the petition on August 22, 2002, but subsequently withdrew it on September 3,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-01

    Order granting certificate of appealability

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board granted certificates of appealability to both the Airport Communities Coalition/Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion and the Port of Seattle, allowing direct review by the Court of Appeals. The order addresses competing petitions for judicial review filed in both Thurston County and King County Superior Courts following the Board’s August 2002 findings
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-08-22

    Port Of Seattle’s petition for reconsideration regarding Condition 8

    The Port of Seattle petitions the Pollution Control Hearings Board to reconsider Condition 8 of its Final Order, which prohibits use of the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) to authorize importation of fill exceeding modified fill criteria. The Port argues that three of the Board’s five concerns regarding SPLP are based on misinterpretation of the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160

    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, pollution, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-07-24

    Notice of supplemental authority

    The Airport Communities Coalition filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority with the Pollution Control Hearings Board, citing two recent Washington State Supreme Court decisions as relevant to the case. The cited cases address state authority under Section 401 certification, water quality standards enforcement, and the obligation of government officials to act in the public interest.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-06-11

    Order correcting the earlier order publishing certain portions of depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board issued a correcting order supplementing its April 22, 2002 order regarding the publication of deposition excerpts from Department of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. The Board declined to reconsider portions excluded on relevancy or vagueness grounds, noting that materials related to political pressure are not relevant in its
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-06-10

    Notice of change of address of counsel for respondent Port Of Seattle

    Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC filed a notice with the Pollution Control Hearings Board informing all counsel of record that the Seattle office address has changed to 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 320, Seattle, Washington 98101. The Olympia office address remains unchanged at 421 South Capitol Way, Suite 303. The notice was served on all counsel
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-06-07

    ACC’s reply in support of its motion to the board for correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of order publishing certain portions of depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a reply brief supporting its motion for correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s April 22 Order regarding publication of deposition testimony from Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. ACC argues the motion is timely, that the Port of Seattle’s cited cases are inapplicable
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-06-03

    Port Of Seattle’s response to ACC’s motion for correction, clarification and reconsideration of Board’s decision publishing portions of depositions

    The Port of Seattle responds to the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion seeking correction, clarification, and reconsideration of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s prior order publishing portions of depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. The Port does not oppose minor transcript corrections but strongly opposes reconsideration on grounds that the motion is untimely
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-05-31

    CASE’s response to ACC’s motion for correction, clarification and/or partial reconsideration of order publishing depositions

    Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) files a concurrence joining Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for correction, clarification, and reconsideration of the Order Publishing Depositions before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. The document is signed by Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. on behalf of CASE. The case involves Washington State Department of Ecology and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "PSRC to lead Regional Aviation Baseline Study" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V