Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-04-17

    Port Of Seattle’s response to ACC’s motion to redact testimony of Paul Fendt, P.E.

    The Port of Seattle responds to the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion to redact testimony of Paul Fendt, P.E. The Port argues that the Walker Creek low flow calculations and Exhibit C were prepared before the February 19, 2002 meeting with Kelly Whiting and before the discovery cutoff, not after as ACC claimed. The Port requests
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-17

    Fifth declaration of Paul S. Fendt, P.E.

    Paul S. Fendt, P.E. submits his fifth declaration in the Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB 01-160, detailing the timeline of meetings and document preparation related to the Port of Seattle’s December 2001 Low Flow Plan. The declaration clarifies that revisions to the Walker Creek low flow period calculations were completed prior to a February
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-11

    Declaration of Peter J. Eglick in support of ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt

    Attorney Peter J. Eglick of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) declares under penalty of perjury the authenticity of four attachments submitted in support of ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. The attachments include a deposition excerpt of Kelly Whiting and three versions of the Walker Creek low flow occurrence chart
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-11

    ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) moves to redact portions of pre-filed testimony by Port of Seattle consultant Paul Fendt, specifically a sentence in paragraph 42 and all of Exhibit C relating to Walker Creek low flow frequencies. ACC argues the material was prepared after the February 28, 2002 discovery cutoff date, was not disclosed prior
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-10

    Declaration of Rachael Paschal Osborn in support of ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed testimony of Paul Fendt

    Attorney Rachael Paschal Osborn declares on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) regarding efforts to redact portions of Paul Fendt’s pre-filed testimony in PCHB No. 01-160. The declaration details communications with Port of Seattle counsel Gil Reavis about the proposed redaction of specific testimony and exhibits. The Port of Seattle responded that the material
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-09

    Post hearing evidentiary order, PCHB 01-160

    This is a post-hearing evidentiary order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board for Washington State in the case of Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. The order governs the admissibility of exhibits following hearings held March 18-29, 2002, explaining procedures for objections, waived objections, and the treatment
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-04

    Certificate of service

    Certificate of service filed by Michael Dennis of Helsell Fetterman LLP on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition in case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. It certifies that on March 14, 2002, copies of cover letters and appellants’ responses to Ecology/Port objections were hand delivered to multiple
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-04-02

    Post-hearing procedural order, PCHB 01-160

    This post-hearing procedural order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board memorializes post-hearing activities and timeframes in the case of Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. It sets deadlines for submission of depositions, finalization of the exhibit matrix, and filing of draft Findings of Fact and Conclusions
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-28

    Revised direct testimony of Dave Garland submitted on behalf of the Department of Ecology

    Revised direct testimony of Dave Garland, a hydrogeologist and supervisor of the Watershed Unit at the Washington Department of Ecology’s Northwest Regional Office, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160. The testimony outlines Garland’s professional background, qualifications, and his role managing the legislature-mandated SeaTac Runway Fill hydrogeologic studies conducted by Pacific
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-28

    Transcript of proceedings, Day Nine: Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington, Department of Ecology, and Port Of Seattle

    This is the transcript of Day Nine of proceedings before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board in the case of Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion versus the State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160). The hearing was conducted on March 28, 2002 at the Environmental
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Permit issuance for the proposed third runway" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V