Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-09-19

    Notice of appearance – Port Of Seattle

    The Port of Seattle files a Notice of Appearance in the Superior Court of Washington for Thurston County in Case No. 02-2-01549-0, entering its appearance through General Counsel Linda J. Strout and Senior Port Counsel Traci M. Goodwin. The case involves Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion as petitioners against the Pollution Control
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-18

    Department of Ecology’s petition for review of agency action

    The Washington State Department of Ecology filed a Petition for Review of Agency Action in Thurston County Superior Court, challenging a decision by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). The petition names the PCHB, Airport Communities Coalition, and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion as respondents, with the Port of Seattle as respondent below. The case concerns
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-17

    Port Of Seattle’s application for direct review to Court of Appeals and request for certificate of appealability from Pollution Control Hearings Board

    The Port of Seattle filed an application for direct review by the Washington Court of Appeals, Division One, of a Pollution Control Hearings Board order issued August 12, 2002, which affirmed a water quality 401 Certification issued by the Washington Department of Ecology for Master Plan Update projects at Sea-Tac Airport, including the Third Runway.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-17

    Notice of assignment and status conference cover letter — ACC v. PCHB, Thurston County Cause No. 02-2-01549-0

    A cover letter from Helsell Fetterman LLP transmitting a Notice of Assignment and Notice of Status Conference in the case ACC v. PCHB et al. (Thurston County Cause No. 02-2-01549-0). The notice assigns the case to Judge Richard D. Hicks in Department 5 and schedules a status conference for December 13, 2002. The case involves
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-16

    Declaration of Roger Pearce supporting Port’s application for direct review and request for certificate of appealability

    Roger A. Pearce, an attorney representing the Port of Seattle, declares under penalty of perjury that two exhibits are attached: the Declaration of Gina Marie Lindsay (Director of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport) filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, and a partial Verbatim Report of Proceedings from Thurston County Case No. 01-2-02386-9. The declaration was executed
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-12

    Airport Communities Coalition’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion’s petition for judicial review of final order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Petitioners Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) filed this petition in Thurston County Superior Court seeking judicial review of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s August 12, 2002 order conditionally affirming the Department of Ecology’s Clean Water Act § 401 water quality certification to the Port of Seattle for its Master Plan
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-12

    Airport Communities Coalition’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion’s application for direct review by court of appeals, and request pursuant to RCW 34.05.518 for certificate of appealability of Pollution Control Hearings Board’s granting final order

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) filed an application in Thurston County Superior Court seeking direct review by the Washington Court of Appeals, Division II, of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s Final Order issued August 12, 2002. The application also requests that the PCHB issue a Certificate of Appealability under
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-10

    Airport Communities Coalition’s notice of appearance

    The Airport Communities Coalition enters its appearance as a respondent in King County Superior Court case No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA, filed by the Port of Seattle against the Pollution Control Hearings Board and other parties. The coalition is represented by attorneys from Helsell Fetterman LLP and Rachael Paschal Osborn. The document includes a certificate of service
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-10

    Order disposing of Port Of Seattle’s petition for reconsideration regarding condition 8 of final order

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board issued this order disposing of the Port of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8, after the Port withdrew its petition on September 3, 2002. Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion had both opposed the petition and requested briefing. The Board entered a dismissal order pursuant to WAC
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-06

    Port Of Seattle’s petition for judicial review of final order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    The Port of Seattle filed a petition for judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act challenging a final order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) on August 12, 2002. The PCHB had affirmed a Section 401 water quality certification issued by the Washington Department of Ecology for the Port’s Master Plan Update at
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Appellants’ reply in support of motion to strike the Port’s pre-hearing brief" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V