Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagWater Quality(478)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR006110: ACC’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Its Motion for Stay (PCHB No. 01-160)

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) seeking to supplement the evidentiary record on its motion for stay of the Section 401 Certification issued by Ecology on September 21, 2001, for the Third Runway Project at Sea-Tac Airport. Documents obtained via public records request to Ecology on
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR025067: Letter to Ecology Submitting Third Runway Embankment Seepage Groundwater Monitoring Plan

    In November 2001, the Port of Seattle submitted a Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan to the Washington Department of Ecology as required by a § 401 Water Quality Certification order. The plan was designed to detect any impacts of the runway fill embankment on nearby receiving waters and groundwater, both during and after fill placement. The Port requested written approval of the plan from the Department of Ecology's Northwest Regional Office.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR052417: Third Runway Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan — 401 Certification Condition E.3

    Port Of Seattle letter dated November 16, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Manager of Aviation Environmental Programs, to Ann Kenny at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting the Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan in satisfaction of § 401 Water Quality Certification Order #1998-4-02325, Condition E.3. The plan, AR 052417–052419, covers
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-15

    EXH AR006159: Port Of Seattle’s Objections to Issues Proposed by ACC, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s objections filed November 15, 2001 to three issues proposed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Case No. 01-160, concerning §401 certification for the Third Runway project. Objects to ACC Proposed Issues 11, 18, and 19: Issue 11 concerns dam safety permit requirements under WAC 173-175 and reasonable
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-15

    EXH AR006193: Ecology’s Objections to Issues Proposed Separately by ACC

    Respondent Washington State Department of Ecology’s objections filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-133, PCHB No. 01-160) to issues proposed separately by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Ecology objects to ACC Issue No. 2 as outside the Board’s jurisdiction over the 401 Certification, and to ACC Issue No. 3 as duplicative, vague, and
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-07

    EXH AR026126: HSPF Modeling Notes — Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks; HSPF-Hydrus/Slice Linkages

    A 2001 technical memo from Hydrocomp, Inc.'s Norm Crawford outlines recommendations for hydrological modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport's new runways and taxiways. The document describes how surface runoff and groundwater flow from both impervious runway surfaces and surrounding pervious grasslands should be calculated and linked across three modeling tools: HSPF, Hydrus, and the Slice model. Key recommendations include properly accounting for infiltration, reducing till seepage by 33% for inactive groundwater recharge, and reconciling discrepancies in land area calculations between the different models.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-01

    EXH AR026637: Trickle Down Effect — Zinc Contamination STIA Stormwater Metal Roofing

    A study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport found that galvanized metal roofing on cargo buildings was the primary source of elevated zinc levels in the airport's stormwater runoff, which drains into salmon-bearing streams including Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek. Researchers used whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing and source-tracing methods to identify the problem, focusing on one outfall (SDN1) that consistently showed higher zinc concentrations and toxic effects on aquatic organisms. The findings prompted the Port of Seattle to investigate remediation options as part of its stormwater pollution prevention program under its NPDES permit.
    TagsACC, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-01

    Exhibit 449: Email Chain Re: Processed Materials and Fill Criteria Under 401 Permit — Port Of Seattle Third Runway

    This 2001 email chain discusses how fill materials used in the construction of Seattle-Tacoma Airport's Third Runway Embankment should meet environmental criteria under a 401 water quality permit. State regulators and Port of Seattle staff debated which materials — including topsoil, utility backfill, base course, and general embankment fill — required testing, supplier certification, or quality assurance plans to demonstrate compliance. Officials agreed that highly processed materials like topsoil could be covered by supplier certification, while bulk embankment fill would require a statistical sampling and QA/QC program.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR029210: 401 Permit Post-Issuance Clarification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Low Flow Analysis Meeting Notes

    Final meeting notes from October 30, 2001 Low Flow Analysis meeting regarding Port Of Seattle’s revisions to the Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal per 401 Permit conditions for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting and David Masters (King County), Lisa Scott (Corps
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-25

    Exhibit 53: Pre Low Flow Meeting Briefing — King County Review of Port Of Seattle HSPF Hydrologic Modeling

    Email from Kelly Whiting (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, dated October 25, 2001, summarizing a pre-meeting briefing on revised low flow hydrologic modeling related to Port Of Seattle airport embankment impacts. Discusses Hydrocomp (Norm Crawford) independent review findings, HSPF modeling errors including incorrect
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 … Page 48
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "NOMBY" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V