Notes

Port Of Seattle letter dated November 16, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Manager of Aviation Environmental Programs, to Ann Kenny at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting the Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan in satisfaction of § 401 Water Quality Certification Order #1998-4-02325, Condition E.3. The plan, AR 052417–052419, covers groundwater and seepage monitoring during and after fill embankment construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including baseline data acquisition, monitoring locations, schedules, water quality screening parameters, post-construction tiered monitoring strategy, contingency plan, and monitoring reports. Key contacts include Paul Agid (Port Of Seattle), Hart Crowser Inc. (Michael Kenrick), Erda Environmental (C. Linn Gould), Foster Pepper Shefelman (Tom Walsh), Stoel Rives (Jim Lynch), and Martin Brown Inc. (Gillis Reavis).

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message