Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1098)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-11-15

    PCHB Doc AR006187: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Supplemental Stipulation Regarding Proposed Statement of Legal Issues

    Supplemental Stipulation filed in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed November 15, 2001, received by the Pollution Control Hearings Board November 16, 2001. Documents 21 agreed proposed legal issues for the Board’s consideration, covering Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for the
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-15

    Exhibit 198: Sea-Tac Third Runway Embankment Fill Modeling — Site Features for Hydrus-Slice Modeling (Figure 2-1)

    This document presents site features and cross-sectional diagrams used for Hydrus-Slice hydrological modeling of the Sea-Tac Third Runway Embankment Fill project. It shows fill depths ranging from 0 to 160 feet across multiple modeled slices, with cross sections identifying impervious areas, elevation contours, and the watershed divide between Miller Creek and Walker Creek. The figures were produced in November 2001 as part of environmental engineering analysis for the third runway construction.
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-15

    EXH AR021065: ACC Updated Preliminary Witness List — PCHB Nos. 01-133 & 01-150

    This November 2001 legal filing lists the witnesses that the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) planned to call at a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The witness list includes personnel from the Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, outside consultants such as Parametrix and Shannon & Wilson, and ACC's own expert witnesses covering environmental, hydraulic, and biological topics. The case, filed under PCHB Nos. 01-133 and 01-150, centered on a water quality certification related to Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-07

    EXH AR026126: HSPF Modeling Notes — Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks; HSPF-Hydrus/Slice Linkages

    A 2001 technical memo from Hydrocomp, Inc.'s Norm Crawford outlines recommendations for hydrological modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport's new runways and taxiways. The document describes how surface runoff and groundwater flow from both impervious runway surfaces and surrounding pervious grasslands should be calculated and linked across three modeling tools: HSPF, Hydrus, and the Slice model. Key recommendations include properly accounting for infiltration, reducing till seepage by 33% for inactive groundwater recharge, and reconciling discrepancies in land area calculations between the different models.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-06

    EXH AR023789: Handwritten Notes — Third Runway EIS Modeling Errors, Port Packages, Mitigation

    A November 6, 2001 handwritten fax note discusses problems with noise modeling errors and how results will be integrated into legal policies. It notes that AK advised POS to produce a more complete and accurate document, and argues it is not reasonable to hold up port mitigation based on a mistake, stating that if there is no impact, there is no impact. The note also references consultant agreement on impact calculations and requirements related to 401 regulations submitted as group per FAA standards.
    TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-03

    PCHB Doc 005845: Memorandum Supporting CASE’s Motion to Intervene in ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Memorandum filed by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) supporting its motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Washington State Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. CASE seeks intervenor status under Civil Rule 24 and WAC 371-08-420(1) in the appeal of Amended Clean Water Act 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) issued
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR026273: Parametrix Transmittal & Responses to ACOE Questions Oct 26 2001 STIA MPU Natural Resource Mitigation

    This November 2001 document from Parametrix, Inc. contains responses to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers questions regarding the Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update's natural resource mitigation project. It addresses technical questions about wetland mapping, watershed basin sizes, low-flow analysis, and cumulative wetland impacts across the Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek basins, showing projected wetland acreage reductions of approximately 3-4% with the project. The document also covers mitigation measures including wetland restoration sites and performance standards for invasive species control.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    PCHB AR006202: ACC’s Separate Statement of Legal Issues — Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    ACC’s Separate Statement of Legal Issues filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, against the State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed November 2, 2001 via fax, received November 5, 2001. Lists 28 legal issues challenging
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPA, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR052350: Geotechnical Summary Report — Third Runway Embankment and MSE Retaining Walls, STIA

    Hart Crowser, Inc. geotechnical summary report prepared for the Port of Seattle for presentation to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Seattle District), dated November 2, 2001, project number 4978-06. Covers design of the Third Runway embankment and three mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls (50–135 feet height) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Addresses 17,000,000
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR018323: Geotechnical Summary Report — Third Runway Embankment and MSE Retaining Walls, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Hart Crowser geotechnical summary report (project 4978-06) prepared for the Port of Seattle for presentation to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, November 2, 2001. Covers Third Runway embankment construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: 17,000,000 cubic yards compacted earth fill, maximum fill thickness 165 feet, 2H:1V side slopes, three Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) retaining walls
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 … Page 110
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Arline Bronzaft, Who Campaigned for a Quieter City, Dies at 89" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V