Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1098)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 297: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 report, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. and several partner firms for the Port of Seattle, analyzes low streamflow conditions and proposes a Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility as part of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. The study examines how planned airport expansion may affect seasonal low-flow water resources in the surrounding area and outlines mitigation measures to offset those impacts. The report is organized across multiple volumes, with Volume 1 containing the main text and Appendices B through J.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 273: Low Streamflow Analysis — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements

    This technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in three creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks) to assess the potential impacts of airport construction projects on summer water flows. Using a 47-year record of streamflow data and computer modeling tools, analysts determined target streamflow levels for each creek and evaluated how proposed runway and infrastructure improvements might affect seasonal low-flow periods critical to salmon habitat. The study found existing summer low streamflow targets of 0.33 cfs for Des Moines Creek, 0.77 cfs for Walker Creek, and 0.73 cfs for Miller Creek, which were used to guide mitigation planning.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-01

    Exhibit 199: Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek 7-Day Low-Flow Calibration Analysis, STIA Master Plan Update

    This technical document compares observed and model-predicted 7-day low streamflows for Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek near Seattle-Tacoma Airport for water years 1991–1996. Results show that calibrated (simulated) flows generally underestimated observed flows at most gage locations, with the exception of 1995, when the model overpredicted flows. Discrepancies at upstream gage locations are attributed to uncertain groundwater conditions within the watersheds.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin Plan
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 264: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 technical report, prepared for the Port of Seattle, analyzes low streamflow conditions around Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and proposes a facility to offset the impact of airport Master Plan construction on summer low flows in nearby creeks. It includes hydrologic modeling, water quality design considerations, and an operation and monitoring plan for a stormwater storage and release system intended to maintain stream levels during dry summer months. Note that while archived alongside airport planning documents, this report focuses on water resources and stream impact mitigation rather than noise policy.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 464: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, assessing the hydrologic impacts of the proposed third runway embankment as part of the airport's Master Plan Update. The study found that the runway construction would reduce summer stream flows, requiring mitigation of 0.11 cfs in Walker Creek and 0.08 cfs in Des Moines Creek during the annual low-flow period (late July through October). To offset these impacts, the Port of Seattle proposed collecting and storing excess winter stormwater in underground vaults—approximately 18.5 acre-feet for Walker Creek and 13.5 acre-feet for Des Moines Creek—for controlled release during dry-season low-flow periods.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-30

    PCHB Doc 5858: Declaration of Brett Fish Supporting CASE’s Motion to Intervene

    Declaration by Brett Fish, President of Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), filed in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Washington State Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Fish declares CASE’s interest in intervening in the ACC’s appeal of Ecology’s 401 Certification for the proposed third runway and master plan update at Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, CASE, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-28

    EXH AR005864: Third Declaration of William A. Rozeboom Relating to ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Third declaration of William A. Rozeboom, professional civil engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Declaration concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Rozeboom identifies significant technical deficiencies
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-27

    EXH AR052548: Sea-Tac Third Runway Embankment Fill Modeling in Support of Low Streamflow Analysis

    Report by Pacific Groundwater Group (project JE0105) prepared for Port Of Seattle, dated November 27, 2001, analyzing embankment fill modeling in support of low streamflow analysis for the Sea-Tac Third Runway. Uses HYDRUS-SLICE modeling to assess vertical infiltration through embankment fill materials (General Fill and Type 1 Fill), saturated flow beneath the fill, and effective
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin Plan
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH AR017588: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regarding Port Of Seattle Low Flow Mitigation, Third Runway

    Letter dated November 26, 2001, from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (on behalf of ACC, Airport Communities Coalition) to Colonel Ralph H. Graves, Ms. Muffy Walker, and Ms. Gail Terzi of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Corps Ref. No. 1996-4-02325. Identifies serious flaws in Port Of Seattle’s low flow mitigation analysis for Miller Creek, Walker
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH 246: Third Declaration William A. Rozeboom ACC Motion for Stay PCHB No. 01-160

    This 2001 legal declaration by civil engineer William Rozeboom, submitted to Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, challenges the Port of Seattle's stormwater and low-flow mitigation plans for the proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Rozeboom argues that the Port's analysis underestimates low-flow impacts on local streams and that the proposed underground storage vaults—equivalent in volume to more than seven Olympic-size swimming pools—are undersized. The declaration also disputes claims by Port engineer Paul Fendt that the water volumes involved are small and that mitigation can be easily adjusted.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 … Page 110
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Aircraft On Approach Over Undeveloped Scrubland Near Airport" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V