Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1098)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-01

    Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Embankment Construction Earthwork (2002)

    Aerial photograph showing large-scale earthwork and grading operations during construction of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's third runway (Runway 16C/34C). The image shows the runway surface and surrounding excavated terrain, with the existing airport facilities and control tower visible in the background.
    TagsAirport Expansion, Construction, Runways, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-01

    PCHB Doc 002384: Order Granting Summary Judgment on Issue 14 — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case PCHB 01-160 order granting summary judgment in favor of Port Of Seattle on Issue 14 (SEPA compliance). ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) appealed the §401 water quality certification issued by Ecology, a prerequisite for a §404 dredge and fill permit from the U.S. Army
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPA, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-01

    Exhibit 200: Resume of Thomas R. Luster, Environmental Scientist, California Coastal Commission

    This document is the professional resume of Thomas R. Luster, an Environmental Scientist with the California Coastal Commission, detailing his career reviewing coastal development projects for compliance with environmental regulations. His background includes senior roles with the Washington State Department of Ecology, where he specialized in Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certifications and Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determinations. The resume focuses on environmental permitting, water quality, and coastal resource protection, and does not contain content related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-28

    EXH AR024306: ACC Review Letter — Nov 2001 NRMP Wetland Mitigation Inadequacies, STIA Third Runway

    A December 2001 letter from Azous Environmental Sciences challenges the Port of Seattle's wetland mitigation plan for the SeaTac Third Runway construction project, arguing that the plan inadequately offsets environmental damage to wetlands and streams. The letter contends that the Port has misclassified wetland 'enhancement' work at Vacca Farm as 'restoration,' inflating mitigation credits, and that the overall plan fails to meet no-net-loss standards required under Army Corps of Engineers regulations.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-26

    EXH 295: ACC Interrogatories Nos. 1-19 and Requests for Production Nos. 1-6; Objections and Responses

    The Port of Seattle submitted formal objections and responses to interrogatories filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, related to a legal dispute over the Port's Third Runway Project. The case centered on the Department of Ecology's water quality certification issued under federal Clean Water Act Section 401. The document outlines the legal procedures governing the exchange of information between the parties during the hearing process.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-26

    EXH 407: ACC Interrogatories Nos. 1-19 and Requests for Production Nos. 1-6; Objections and Responses

    This document contains the Port of Seattle's formal objections and responses to interrogatories and requests for production filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board (Case No. 01-160). The Port identifies over a dozen expert witnesses it intends to call, including specialists in geotechnical engineering, toxicology, hydrology, and groundwater science from firms such as Parametrix, Inc., Hart Crowser, and ENSR Toxicology. The case centers on environmental and pollution concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport operations.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-22

    PCHB Doc 5791: ACC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Absence of Water Right

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion for partial summary judgment filed in PCHB No. 01-160 against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, arguing the Section 401 Certification should be invalidated because the Port lacks a water right to permanently mitigate low-flow impacts of the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. Cites PCHB December
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR026603: Letter USFWS to James M. Lynch — Monitoring Plan Embankment Fill Seepage, Master Plan Update ESA Consultation (1-3-00-F-1420)

    This December 2001 letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Western Washington office provides detailed comments on a Monitoring Plan for Embankment Fill Seepage related to a Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update, reviewed under the Endangered Species Act. The agency requested key revisions, including monitoring both seepage quality and quantity, beginning monitoring when seepage first occurs rather than after embankment completion, and ensuring groundwater wells are considered as a monitoring pathway. The letter also clarified that any exceedances of water quality criteria must be reported promptly, and that the Federal Aviation Administration—not the Port—would be responsible for reinitiating formal consultation.
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Master Plan, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR053223: Effect of Shear Modulus on Deformations and Reinforcing Stresses of MSE Walls — Third Runway Project

    Memorandum dated December 20, 2001 from Michael Bailey, P.E. and Reda A. Mikhail, P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson, P.E. of HNTB Corporation regarding AR053223, project 4798-40. Analyzes sensitivity of MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall design to variations in soil shear modulus under dynamic/seismic loading for the Third Runway Project at Sea-Tac Airport,
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-19

    Exhibit 2057: Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan — 401 Water Quality Certification Conditions Matrix

    Email from Jim Kelley (Parametrix, Inc.) to Ann Kenny dated December 19, 2001, transmitting a matrix document summarizing changes made to the Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan (NRMP) to comply with Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 (401 Certification) issued September 21, 2001. The attached matrix details resolutions for required mitigation conditions including: monitoring duration
    TagsACC, Ecology, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 … Page 110
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "PCHB Doc 002047: Revised Direct Testimony of Dave Garland on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V