Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagStormwater(385)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-18

    Exhibit 228: NHC Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Identifying Port Of Seattle Document Inconsistencies in SMP and NRMP for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update

    A December 2001 technical letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, identifies inconsistencies in the Port of Seattle's stormwater management plans for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The letter argues that the Port's hydrologic modeling failed to account for the planned commercial redevelopment of borrow pit areas by 2006, and that the Natural Resource Mitigation Plan reverted to an outdated stormwater approach relying on regional detention facilities to be built by others. These gaps, the consultants contend, prevent a full assessment of the airport Master Plan Update's environmental impacts.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-18

    EXH AR017596: NHC Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers re Port Of Seattle Document Inconsistencies in SMP for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC), retained by ACC (Airport Communities Coalition), wrote to Colonel Ralph H. Graves, Ms. Muffy Walker, and Ms. Gail Terzi of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District (Corps Ref. No. 1996-4-02325) identifying inconsistencies in Port Of Seattle proposals for site development and stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR017886: Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements

    Report prepared by Parametrix, Inc. with Aqua Terra Consultants, Earth Tech, Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, HNTB, and Pacific Groundwater Group for Port Of Seattle regarding Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. Analyzes summer low streamflow impacts to Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek from planned airport projects and proposes an offset facility using underground
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 464: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, assessing the hydrologic impacts of the proposed third runway embankment as part of the airport's Master Plan Update. The study found that the runway construction would reduce summer stream flows, requiring mitigation of 0.11 cfs in Walker Creek and 0.08 cfs in Des Moines Creek during the annual low-flow period (late July through October). To offset these impacts, the Port of Seattle proposed collecting and storing excess winter stormwater in underground vaults—approximately 18.5 acre-feet for Walker Creek and 13.5 acre-feet for Des Moines Creek—for controlled release during dry-season low-flow periods.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 264: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 technical report, prepared for the Port of Seattle, analyzes low streamflow conditions around Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and proposes a facility to offset the impact of airport Master Plan construction on summer low flows in nearby creeks. It includes hydrologic modeling, water quality design considerations, and an operation and monitoring plan for a stormwater storage and release system intended to maintain stream levels during dry summer months. Note that while archived alongside airport planning documents, this report focuses on water resources and stream impact mitigation rather than noise policy.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-28

    EXH AR005864: Third Declaration of William A. Rozeboom Relating to ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Third declaration of William A. Rozeboom, professional civil engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Declaration concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Rozeboom identifies significant technical deficiencies
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH AR006092: Third Declaration of Paul S. Fendt — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Third Declaration of Paul S. Fendt (Parametrix, Inc.) filed in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Fendt, licensed PE with 18+ years stormwater engineering experience, addresses calculation of summer low streamflow impacts on Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek for the Port Of Seattle Master
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH 246: Third Declaration William A. Rozeboom ACC Motion for Stay PCHB No. 01-160

    This 2001 legal declaration by civil engineer William Rozeboom, submitted to Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, challenges the Port of Seattle's stormwater and low-flow mitigation plans for the proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Rozeboom argues that the Port's analysis underestimates low-flow impacts on local streams and that the proposed underground storage vaults—equivalent in volume to more than seven Olympic-size swimming pools—are undersized. The declaration also disputes claims by Port engineer Paul Fendt that the water volumes involved are small and that mitigation can be easily adjusted.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH 300: Third Declaration Paul S. Fendt — ACC v. Ecology, PCHB No. 01-160

    This legal declaration by stormwater engineer Paul S. Fendt, filed before Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, addresses the Port of Seattle's Master Plan Update and its potential impacts on local stream flows in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport. Fendt explains the use of the HSPF hydrologic model and a 2-year, 7-day low flow standard to assess and mitigate summer streamflow impacts resulting from planned airport expansion projects. He concludes that revised analysis shows no significant changes to previously calculated low flow impacts.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-15

    PCHB Doc 6195: Ecology’s Revised Preliminary Witness and Exhibit List — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, 01-160)

    Respondent State of Washington Department of Ecology’s revised preliminary witness and exhibit list filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-133 and 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Lists 11 Ecology witnesses including Ann Kenny, Erik Stockdale, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Dave Garland, and others from Ecology Northwest Regional Office
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 … Page 39
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "HR5912 – Expedited Delivery of Airport Infrastructure Act of 2020" — , 2020

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V