Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(1835)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1993-04-29

    Resolution A-93-03: A resolution of the General Assembly of the Puget Sound Regional Council amending the 1988 Interim Regional Airport System Plan (RASP) for long-term commercial air transportation capacity needs of the region

    In April 1993, the Puget Sound Regional Council adopted Resolution A-93-03, amending its Regional Airport System Plan to address long-term commercial air transportation needs for the central Puget Sound region. The resolution established a dual-track strategy of pursuing both a major supplemental airport within the four-county area and a third runway at Sea-Tac Airport, with the third runway to be authorized by April 1, 1996 unless a viable supplemental site could eliminate that need. Key conditions attached to the third runway approval included independent evaluation of demand management programs and measurable noise reduction performance objectives, while small supplemental airports such as Paine Field were eliminated as preferred alternatives.
    TagsPSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, RASP, Regional Airport System Plan, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderPuget Sound Regional Council
  • 1993-04-29

    Resolution A-93-03: A resolution of the General Assembly of the Puget Sound Regional Council amending the 1988 Interim Regional Airport System Plan (RASP) for long-term commercial air transportation capacity needs of the region

    In April 1993, the Puget Sound Regional Council adopted Resolution A-93-03, amending its 1988 Regional Airport System Plan to address long-term commercial air transportation needs in the central Puget Sound region. The resolution established a preferred strategy of pursuing both a major supplemental airport within the four-county area and a third runway at Sea-Tac Airport, with the third runway to be authorized by April 1, 1996 subject to conditions including noise reduction performance objectives and demand management efforts. The resolution also eliminated small supplemental airports such as Paine Field as a preferred alternative and called for site-specific environmental impact studies on the proposed Sea-Tac third runway.
    TagsFlight Plan Project, Puget Sound Regional Council, RASP, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderPuget Sound Regional Council
  • 1993-04-21

    Sound Information: Sea-Tac Noise Abatement Report, Fourth Quarter 1992

    This quarterly Sea-Tac Noise Abatement Report from the Port of Seattle (Q4 1992) tracks progress in reducing airport noise, highlighting that 71% of jet flights were operated by quieter Stage 3 aircraft, up from 63.4% the previous quarter. All airlines stayed within their allocated noise budgets, and new nighttime restrictions effective October 1, 1992 limited louder Stage 2 jets between midnight and 6:00 a.m. The report also outlines noise abatement flight procedures designed to route departing and arriving aircraft over industrial areas and water to minimize noise impacts on surrounding communities.
    TagsNoise Abatement Procedures, Noise Remedy Update, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Sea-Tac Noise Abatement CommitteeFolderFlyers
  • 1993-04-15

    Noise Exposure Map NEM Future 1996 pg 210 from 1993 Part 150 Study

    A Future Noise Exposure Map for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport projecting 1996 noise contours (Ldn 65, 70, and 75), showing affected land uses including residential, schools, and hospitals across the Sea-Tac area. Signed by R. Burr Stewart, Director of Aviation Planning, Port of Seattle, and dated April 15, 1993, at a scale of 1:36,000.
    TagsFAA, Map, Noise, Part 150, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPart 150
  • 1993-04-15

    1991 Sea-Tac Part 150 Noise Exposure Map NEM

    This is the official 1991 Existing Noise Exposure Map for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, submitted in accordance with F.A.R. Part 150, signed by R. Bun Stewart, Director of Aviation Planning, Port of Seattle, on April 15, 1993. The map depicts Ldn noise contours (65, 70, and 75) over the surrounding communities including Seattle, Tukwila, SeaTac, Normandy Park, Burien, Kent, and Federal Way, with the Ldn 65 contour encompassing approximately 14,128 acres and 67,000 people.
    TagsMap, Noise, Noise Countour, Part 150, Sea-Tac AirportFolder1993
  • 1993-04-15

    FAR Part 150 1991 Existing Noise Exposure Map (NEM) — Sea-Tac Airport

    This is the official 1991 Existing Noise Exposure Map for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, prepared in accordance with FAR Part 150. The map covers the Sea-Tac flight corridor from Puget Sound to Lake Washington, showing noise contours, jurisdictional boundaries across King County municipalities, and land use designations including residential, school, hospital/nursing home, mobile home park, and airport zones; it is signed by W.E. Bus-Street, Director of Aviation Planning, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, and dated April 15, 1993.
    TagsKing County, Map, Noise, Part 150, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPart 150
  • 1993-03-31

    Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport: Flight Track Plot Sample – Turbojets

    This Port of Seattle document explains flight track plots for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, which are overhead graphic illustrations showing the ground paths of arriving and departing jet aircraft over a 24-hour period, separated into daytime and nighttime operations for both north and south traffic flows. The data is sourced from the FAA's Automated Radar Terminal System (ARTS). Notably, the document emphasizes that even aircraft following identical routes will not fly the exact same path, as factors like pilot technique, air traffic control, weather, and aircraft performance cause flight corridors to widen with increasing distance from the airport.
    TagsFactSheet, Flight Tracks, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFlyers
  • 1993-03-03

    RCAA letter to John Sandelius

    A March 1993 letter from the RCAA (Regional Commission on Airport Affairs) Executive Board addressed to John Sandelius of Seattle, thanking him for his time, energy, and wisdom contributed to the organization's efforts regarding Sea-Tac Airport noise issues. The letter expresses well-wishes for his recovery and notes that his work was valued whenever the community needed him. The document is endorsed by a wide coalition of over 50 community organizations, city governments, and civic groups from the greater Seattle and South King County area opposing airport noise expansion.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, RCAA, Regional Commission On Airport Affairs, Sea-Tac AirportFolderRCAA
  • 1993-02-02

    PSAPCA’s role regarding airport air quality

    The Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) raised concerns in 1992 about inadequate air quality analysis in the Flight Plan Project's environmental impact statement, citing missing dispersion modeling for both vehicle and aircraft emissions near Sea-Tac Airport. A follow-up 1992 letter addressed the use of ethylene glycol as a de-icing agent at Sea-Tac, concluding it was unlikely to pose a significant air quality risk due to its low vapor pressure. A 1993 internal memo clarified PSAPCA's role in reviewing airport-related environmental impact statements and conducting annual inspections of registered equipment at airports within its jurisdiction.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Flight Plan Project, PSAPCA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderEnvironment
  • 1993-01-26

    RCAA Regional Commission on Airport Affairs information packet

    The Regional Commission on Airport Affairs (RCAA) was a coalition of cities and citizen groups in the Puget Sound region that opposed the proposed third dependent runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport in the early 1990s. The organization compiled expert research and white papers covering noise impacts, public health effects, environmental and social consequences, and economic costs associated with airport expansion. Their goal was to identify financially feasible and environmentally responsible alternatives to meet the region's air capacity needs without further expanding Sea-Tac.
    TagsNoise, RCAA, Regional Commission On Airport Affairs, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderRCAA

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 … Page 184
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Navigating Section 163: September 2022 update" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V