This August 1994 report, prepared by the Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center in Atlantic City, New Jersey, presents technical data collected as part of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Capacity Enhancement Design Team Study. It is the sixth in a series of data packages examining airport capacity and delay simulation at Sea-Tac, with findings subject to revision as the design team's analysis continued. The document serves as an interim reference for planners and researchers studying runway and airspace capacity improvements at the airport.

Notes

This interim technical report (Data Package No. 6) was prepared by the FAA Technical Center’s Aviation Capacity Branch as part of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Capacity Enhancement Design Team Study. It contains technical data pertaining to airport capacity and delay simulation analysis. The document notes that information is subject to change as Design Team analysis progresses.

Sidebar On/Off

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.

continue...

V V

Notes

Message