TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

A cover letter and chain of custody documentation from Analytical Resources, Incorporated to Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. regarding water sample analysis for Case 2. Four water samples were accepted on January 31, 2002, and analyzed for metals, conventionals, and glycols; the glycols required re-analysis outside holding time due to calibration issues.

A cover letter and chain of custody documentation from Analytical Resources, Incorporated to Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. regarding nine water samples accepted on January 28, 2002 for Case 1. The package includes a Chain of Custody Record, laboratory analysis request, and an organics analysis data sheet for glycols by GC-FID showing

A laboratory analysis report from Analytical Resources, Inc. to Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. regarding four water samples accepted on January 31, 2002 for Case 2. The report notes that metals and conventionals analysis proceeded without incident, but glycol analysis required re-analysis outside holding time due to calibration issues, with both data

A hand-drawn graph showing flow rate over time with three curves: minute, hourly, and infiltration capacity. The diagram illustrates the relationship between flow rates at different time scales and infiltration capacity, with a hatched area indicating excess flow above infiltration capacity. This appears to be a hydrological sketch used as a legal exhibit.

Stipulation and Agreed Order filed February 8, 2002, in Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB No. 01-160, involving Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Airport Expansion as appellants against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle as respondents, concerning Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1). Parties including

Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, opposing ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) claims that Ecology’s 401 Certification is invalid due to SEPA non-compliance. The motion argues six independent grounds for dismissal of Agreed Issue No. 14 (‘Did

Declaration of Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities and Environmental Programs at Port Of Seattle, filed in PCHB Case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Feldman attests to the history of environmental review for the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update, including the 1996 FEIS, May 1997 SEIS, FAA

An email from Peter Willing to John Strand reporting turbidity measurements taken during a Sea-Tac site visit on January 28, 2002. Two samples were recorded: tank farm outfall readings of 281 NTU and 299 NTU, compared to DM Cr (Des Moines Creek) readings of 31 NTU and 31.2 NTU. The document includes full email headers.

A letter from Gillis E. Reavis of Marten Brown attorneys to Kevin L. Stock of Helsell Fetterman enclosing two spreadsheets listing reference documents relied on by expert John Strunk in PCHB No. 01-160. The spreadsheets list documents related to preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport, including studies

GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reviewing the Port of Seattle’s Low Flow Analysis for the Third Runway Expansion Project. The letter identifies critical deficiencies in the Port’s analysis, including failure to account for initial years of water flow lag through the