EXH AR022134: GeoSyntec Letter to Army Corps — Comments Third Runway Low Flow Analysis

A February 2002 technical letter from GeoSyntec Consultants, submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious concerns about the Port of Seattle's water flow analysis for the Sea-Tac Third Runway expansion project. The report argues that the Port's analysis fails to account for the years-long delay before water would flow through the new embankment fill and reach surrounding creeks, potentially leaving those creeks without adequate water during the critical early years after construction. GeoSyntec concludes that the storage vaults designed to protect creek water levels are likely undersized and that the Port has not reliably demonstrated the project will meet low streamflow requirements.

Notes

GeoSyntec Consultants letter dated 7 February 2002, authored by Cheryl J. Hammer, submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch (Muffy Walker/Gail Terzi) on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Provides technical review of the Port of Seattle Sea-Tac Third Runway embankment fill low streamflow analysis, specifically critiquing the November 27, 2001 Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG) report ‘Embankment Fill Modeling in Support of Low Streamflow Analysis.’ Key findings: failure to account for initial-years water lag (1–6 years depending on embankment height: 20 ft, 110 ft, 150 ft cross-sections), overestimation of hydraulic conductivity, under-designed storage vaults, uncalibrated Hydrus and SLICE spreadsheet models, and failure to evaluate embankment soil variability. GeoSyntec independent Hydrus 2D analyses cited. Exhibit AR022134, PCHB Third Runway EIS proceeding.

V V