TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Analytical Resources, Inc. submitted water sample analysis results to attorney Richard Poulin of Smith & Lowney law firm in February 2002 for a matter identified as Case 1. Nine water samples were collected on January 28, 2002 and tested for ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, with neither compound detected above the 5.0 mg/L detection limit. The chain of custody record shows samples were collected by Greg Wingard of CASE and received by ARI laboratory staff for quality-controlled analysis.

A February 2002 analytical laboratory report from Analytical Resources, Inc. to Seattle law firm Smith & Lowney, documenting water sample testing results for a project referenced as Case 2. Four water samples were collected on January 31, 2002, and analyzed for metals, conventional parameters, and glycols, with the glycol analysis requiring re-testing due to calibration issues outside acceptable control limits. The results showed no detectable levels of ethylene glycol or propylene glycol above the 5.0 mg/L detection limit.

A February 2002 letter from Analytical Resources, Inc. to attorney Richard Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. transmits laboratory analytical results for nine water samples accepted on January 28, 2002, under Case 1. The samples were received intact with no discrepancies noted on the chain of custody record, and analysis for requested parameters including glycols, TSS, copper, zinc, and hardness proceeded without incident. Quality control results, including a method blank showing no detected ethylene or propylene glycol above 5.0 mg/L, are included in the report.

A February 2002 laboratory report from Analytical Resources, Inc. documents the analysis of four water samples submitted by the law firm Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. for a project identified as Case 2. The samples were tested for metals, conventional parameters, and glycols, with results showing no ethylene or propylene glycol detected above the 5.0 mg/L detection limit. A calibration issue with the glycol analysis required re-testing outside the standard holding time, though re-analysis confirmed the original findings.

This document is a professional curriculum vitae for Dr. K.M. Leytham, Ph.D., P.E., an engineering hydrologist with extensive experience in flood analysis, stormwater management, and catchment hydrology modeling. Dr. Leytham holds degrees from the University of Birmingham, MIT, and the University of Washington, and has worked on projects across North America and internationally. His project experience includes dam safety reviews, flood reduction studies, and reservoir inflow analyses, primarily with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants in Seattle.

This document, marked as Leytham Exhibit 222 (dated 2/11/02), contains a hand-drawn diagram illustrating flow rate over time, showing the relationship between minute and hourly measurements alongside an infiltration capacity curve. The sketch plots flow rate on the vertical axis against time intervals (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes) on the horizontal axis, with a shaded area indicating peak flow. It appears to be a technical exhibit related to stormwater or drainage analysis presented in proceedings concerning Sea-Tac Airport policy.

Stipulation and Agreed Order filed February 8, 2002, in Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB No. 01-160, involving Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Airport Expansion as appellants against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle as respondents, concerning Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1). Parties including

Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, opposing ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) claims that Ecology’s 401 Certification is invalid due to SEPA non-compliance. The motion argues six independent grounds for dismissal of Agreed Issue No. 14 (‘Did

Declaration of Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities and Environmental Programs at Port Of Seattle, filed in PCHB Case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Feldman attests to the history of environmental review for the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update, including the 1996 FEIS, May 1997 SEIS, FAA

This declaration by Paul Fendt, a licensed civil engineer with over 18 years of stormwater experience, was submitted in support of the Port of Seattle's opposition to the Airport Communities Coalition's motion in a 2001 Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board case. Fendt explains how new airport development and impervious surfaces can impact local waterways by increasing runoff and reducing groundwater recharge, and describes the stormwater management systems required by the Washington Department of Ecology for the Port of Seattle's Master Plan Update projects. The document provides technical background on stormwater best management practices (BMPs) and regulatory requirements under Washington State and federal Clean Water Act permits.