EXH 329: GeoSyntec Letter to USACE — Third Runway Low Flow Analysis Comments

A February 2002 technical letter from GeoSyntec Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises concerns about the Port of Seattle's low flow analysis for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway expansion project. The letter argues that the Port's analysis fails to account for the years-long delay before water would flow through the new embankment fill into drainage systems feeding nearby creeks, potentially leaving those creeks without adequate water during the critical early years of operation. GeoSyntec concludes that the Port has not demonstrated the project's storage vaults are properly sized, and that the underlying computer models are unreliable due to lack of calibration and flawed assumptions about soil hydraulic conductivity.

Notes

Exhibit 329 (AR 020946). GeoSyntec Consultants letter dated February 7, 2002, submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch (Muffy Walker/Gail Terzi), commenting on the Port of Seattle’s Third Runway Low Flow Analysis for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Reviews Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG) November 27, 2001 report ‘Embankment Fill Modeling in Support of Low Streamflow Analysis.’ Key findings: Port’s analysis fails to account for initial years lag time (estimated 1–6 years depending on embankment height of 20 ft, 110 ft, or 150 ft) before water reaches creek drainage layer; Hydrus 2D and SLICE spreadsheet model reliability questioned; embankment hydraulic conductivity overestimated; storage vault volumes likely under-designed; creek low flow mitigation requirements unmet during initial post-construction period. GeoSyntec performed independent Hydrus 2D analyses. References PGG report Figures 5-1, 5-2, 5-3 and Table 5-7; embankment fill lengths of 1600 ft, 3700 ft, and 3200 ft for respective cross-sections.

V V