EXH AR024316: GeoSyntec Comments Third Runway Low Flow Analysis ACC Technical Review Letter

A February 2002 technical letter from GeoSyntec Consultants, submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious concerns about the Port of Seattle's water flow analysis for the proposed Sea-Tac Third Runway expansion. The letter argues that the Port's analysis fails to account for the years-long delay before water would flow through the new embankment fill into drainage systems, potentially leaving nearby creeks without adequate water during the critical early years of operation. GeoSyntec concludes that the storage vaults designed to protect creek water levels may be significantly undersized due to flawed modeling assumptions and an overestimation of how quickly water would move through the embankment soil.

Notes

GeoSyntec Consultants letter dated 7 February 2002 to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch (Muffy Walker/Gail Terzi), submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), providing technical comments on the Port of Seattle Sea-Tac Third Runway embankment fill low streamflow analysis. Reviews the November 27, 2001 Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG) report ‘Port of Seattle – Sea-Tac Third Runway – Embankment Fill Modeling in Support of Low Streamflow Analysis.’ Key findings include: failure to account for initial years’ water lag (1–6 years depending on embankment height of 20 ft, 110 ft, or 150 ft); unreliable long-term hydraulic conductivity estimates; unvalidated model assumptions; errors introduced by using 1D Hydrus converted to SLICE spreadsheet; and potential under-design of storage vaults. Uses Hydrus 2D independent analysis. Embankment sections totaling over 8,000 ft analyzed including 1,600 ft at 150 ft height, 3,700 ft at 110 ft, and 3,200 ft at 20 ft (per PGG Table 5-7). AR 024316–024318.

V V