Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015948: Prefiled Testimony of Michael Cheyne — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB 01-160

    Prefiled direct testimony of Michael Cheyne submitted on behalf of Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Testimony covers Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update process, public process
    TagsACC, CASE, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015899: Prefiled Testimony of Jan L. Cassin, Ph.D. — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled direct testimony of Jan L. Cassin, Ph.D., submitted in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony addresses wetlands identification on the Vacca Farm site, mitigation plan adequacy, restoration and enhancement credit ratios, Miller Creek
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015848: Prefiled Testimony of Joseph Brascher, PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled testimony of Joseph Brascher submitted in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony covers low streamflow modeling at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) using HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran) model integrated with
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    Declaration of Paul S. Fendt

    Declaration by Paul S. Fendt, a stormwater engineer with Parametrix Inc., submitted in the Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB 01-133 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle). The declaration describes Fendt’s qualifications and provides technical details about stormwater management and low flow mitigation for the Port of Seattle’s Master Plan
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015776: Prefiled Testimony of Michael Bailey, P.E. — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Prefiled testimony of Michael Bailey, P.E. submitted in Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony covers design and engineering of embankment and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls at Sea-Tac Airport, seismic basis
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015761: Direct Testimony of Chung Ki Yee on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Direct testimony of Chung Ki Yee, Environmental Engineer 3 in the Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program, submitted in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Yee was asked by Kevin Fitzpatrick of the Northwest Regional Office Water Quality Program (NWRO/WQ) in June 2001 to develop fill criteria for Port Of
    TagsACC, CASE, Model Toxics Control Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015746: Direct Testimony of Kelly Whiting on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Kelly Whiting, Engineer III at King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, submitted on behalf of the Washington State Department of Ecology in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE); respondents are Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Whiting reviewed the Port of
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015729: Direct Testimony of Gordon White on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Gordon White, Program Manager for the Shorelands and Environmental Assistance (SEA) program at the Washington State Department of Ecology, submitted in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) versus respondents State of Washington Department of Ecology
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015720: Direct Testimony of Ching-Pi Wang on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Ching-Pi Wang, Environmental Engineer 4 in the Toxics Cleanup Program, Northwest Regional Office, Department of Ecology, Bellevue, Washington, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH AR015700: Direct Testimony of Katie Walter on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Katie Walter, senior principal wetland scientist at Shannon & Wilson, Inc., submitted on behalf of the Washington State Department of Ecology in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Walter reviews the Port Of Seattle’s Natural Resources
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Filing Week: It’s time to run for office and push for airport accountability" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V