Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR012668: Declaration of Joseph Brascher — PCHB 01-133, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Joseph Brascher of Aqua Terra Consultants in PCHB case 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Brascher describes his expertise in surface and groundwater modeling using HSPF, SWMM, MODFLOW, and other hydrologic software packages. Aqua Terra acted as subconsultant to Parametrix, Inc. for the Low Flow Analysis
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-10-04

    PCHB Doc 13: Declaration of Kevin L. Stock in Response to Port Of Seattle’s Application for Direct Review

    Declaration of Kevin L. Stock, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed October 4, 2002, in King County Superior Court case No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA, Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), ACC, and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE). Lists Exhibits A–L attached to the declaration, including seven letters from Dr. Stephen Hockaday to
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stephen Hockaday
  • 2002-09-27

    AR 000179: Notice of Appearance — ACC in Ecology v. Pollution Control Hearings Board et al.

    Notice of Appearance filed by attorney John E. Woodring (WSBA# 6781) on behalf of petitioner Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in Thurston County Superior Court case No. 02-2-01595-3, State of Washington Department of Ecology v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), and Port Of Seattle. Served on multiple parties including
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-19

    EXH AR000332: Port Of Seattle Notice of Appearance and Certificate of Service — Case No. 02-2-01595-3

    Port Of Seattle Notice of Appearance filed September 19, 2002 in Superior Court of Washington for Thurston County, Case No. 02-2-01595-3, State of Washington Department of Ecology v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, Airport Communities Coalition, and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion. Signed by Linda J. Strout (WSBA #9422) and Traci M. Goodwin (WSBA #14974). Accompanied by
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-19

    EXH AR000336: Port Of Seattle Notice of Appearance — ACC and CASE v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, Case No. 02-2-01549-0

    Port Of Seattle Notice of Appearance filed September 19, 2002 in Thurston County Superior Court, Case No. 02-2-01549-0, entering appearance through General Counsel Linda J. Strout (WSBA #9422) and Senior Port Counsel Traci M. Goodwin (WSBA #14974). Petitioners are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE); respondents include the Pollution Control Hearings
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-18

    PCHB Doc 181: Ecology Petition for Review of Agency Action — State of Washington, Dep’t of Ecology v. Pollution Control Hearings Board, et al.

    Department of Ecology (Ecology) petition for review of agency action filed in Thurston County Superior Court (Case No. 02-2-01595-3) on September 18, 2002, against the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), with Port Of Seattle as respondent below. Ecology challenges a PCHB decision involving a Clean
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-09-17

    EXH AR000340: ACC v. PCHB — Notice of Assignment and Status Conference, Thurston County Cause No. 02-2-01549-0

    Cover letter dated September 17, 2002 from Peter J. Eglick of Helsell Fetterman LLP to multiple counsel including Roger Pearce (Foster Pepper & Shefelman), Joan Marchioro, Thomas Young, Jeff Kray (Attorney General’s Office, Ecology Division), Gillis Reavis, Jay Manning (Brown Reavis & Manning), Linda Strout, Traci Goodwin (Port Of Seattle), and Jean Wilkinson (Assistant Attorney
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-17

    PCHB Doc 345: Port Of Seattle Application for Direct Review to Court of Appeals and Request for Certificate of Appealability from Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Port Of Seattle application filed in King County Superior Court (Case No. 02-2-25658-9SEA) before Judge Bruce Hilyer, seeking direct review by Washington Court of Appeals Division One of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) August 12, 2002 Order affirming Ecology’s 401 Certification (Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1341) for the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-16

    EXH AR000355: Declaration of Roger Pearce Supporting Port Of Seattle’s Application for Direct Review and Request for Certificate of Appealability

    Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC, supporting Port Of Seattle’s application for direct review and request for certificate of appealability in King County Superior Court Case No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA before Hon. Bruce Hilyer. Filed against the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-12

    EXH AR000375: ACC and CASE Petition for Judicial Review of Final Order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition, composed of Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and Highline School District) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) petition for judicial review filed in Thurston County Superior Court under Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW. Challenges PCHB No. 01-160 final Order of August 12, 2002 (finalized September
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Greg Wingard Environmental Consultant Resume" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V