Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-09-11

    EXH AR017496: Email from Peter Kmet to Chung K. Yee Regarding New Method A Soil Cleanup Levels

    Internal email dated September 11, 2000 from Peter Kmet to Chung K. Yee (cc: Kevin Fitzpatrick) discussing new Method A soil cleanup levels under MTCA (Model Toxics Control Act) and their use as a basis for defining clean fill. Kmet addresses specific chemicals including arsenic (recommends 7 PPM background value from USGS statewide study instead
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil
  • 2000-09-11

    EXH AR017276: Clean Fill Criteria Language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Email from Peter Kmet to Kevin Fitzpatrick, Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), dated September 11, 2000, providing comments on proposed Clean Fill Criteria language for the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. Kmet comments on sections E6, E7, E7a, E7b, E7c regarding Port Of Seattle borrow sites, fill
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-09-11

    Exhibit 2127: Email Chain RE: Clean Fill Criteria Language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Email chain dated September 11, 2000 among Washington State Department of Ecology staff (Chung K. Yee, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Peter Kmet) and ATG’s Joan Marchioro regarding clean fill criteria language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea-Tac Third Runway. Peter Kmet raises concerns about arsenic limits (proposed 20 vs. background 7-8 in Western Washington),
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-09-11

    EXH AR017282: Email Chain on Clean Fill Criteria Language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Email chain dated September 11, 2000 among Kevin Fitzpatrick, Peter Kmet, Chung K. Yee, Joan Marchioro, and Tom Luster of Washington State Department of Ecology (Water Quality Program, NWRO) regarding clean fill criteria language for the 401 Water Quality Certification on the Sea-Tac Third Runway project. Document marked ‘Deliberative Document Currently Exempt From Public Disclosure.’
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Model Toxics Control Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-09-08

    The Third Runway Update – Talking Points

    This SMT talking points document from September 8, 2000 summarizes ECY’s (Washington State Department of Ecology) ongoing review of the Third Runway and related Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan improvements since 1996. It outlines primary areas of concern including wetland mitigation, wildlife hazard management, stormwater management, and ESA compliance, and describes the current status of the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2000-09-07

    Letter to Washington State Department of Ecology regarding 401 certification for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    The Airport Communities Coalition submits preliminary comments to the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding the August 2000 Preliminary Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. The letter raises concerns about discrepancies in base flow impact analyses, cumulative impacts from future commercial development, inconsistencies between the SMP and the Natural
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2000-09-07

    401 Certification for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: Preliminary review comments on the Stormwater Management Plan

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants submitted preliminary review comments to the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding the August 2000 Preliminary Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. The letter identifies significant discrepancies in the evaluation of baseflow impacts, concerns about speculative water rights acquisition estimates, cumulative impact assessment gaps, and inconsistencies
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2000-09-07

    EXH AR046005: Draft Memorandum — Methods and Results of Liquefaction Analyses, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Draft memorandum J-4978-28 from Hart Crowser (Douglas Lindquist, Barry Chen PhD P.E., Michael Bailey P.E.) to Jim Thomson P.E. at HNTB, dated September 7, 2000, presenting methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the proposed Third Runway embankment and retaining walls at Sea-Tac, Washington. Analyzed 120 borings with Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results from 112
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway
  • 2000-09-07

    Exhibit 138: Smith & Lowney Letter to Ecology Regarding Port Of Seattle NPDES Permit Violations and Third Runway Water Quality Certification

    Fax cover sheet and two-page letter dated September 7, 2000 from Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. to Raymond Hellwig (Director, NW Regional Office, Washington Department of Ecology) and Tom Luster (Permit Coordination Unit, Ecology), on behalf of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) and Waste Action Project (WAP). Letter transmits a 60-day Notice
    TagsACC, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-09-06

    Implementation Plan for the Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility

    A letter from Water Resources Consulting LLC to the Washington State Department of Ecology critiquing the Port of Seattle’s Implementation Plan for the Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility. The author, on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, argues the plan is vague and unfinished, lacking hydrologic analysis, secured water sources, and specific design details.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "STCP Chapter 6 Urban Center Diagrams: Theoretical, Modified, and Applied Models" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V