Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagNoise(262)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1991-01-01

    Part 150 Noise Exposure Map 1991 — Ldn 65 Contour Area and Population

    Text states that the Ldn 65 noise contour contains approximately 14,128 acres and 67,000 people. This figure relates to the noise impact area around Sea-Tac Airport as defined by the Day-Night Average Sound Level (Ldn) metric.
    TagsDNL65, Noise, Part 150, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPart 150
  • 1990-03-16

    Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL): The Descriptor of Choice for Airport Noise Assessment

    This 1990 FAA document explains why the Day Night Average Sound Level (DNL) was chosen as the standard metric for measuring airport noise. DNL averages noise exposure over a full 24-hour period, applying a penalty for nighttime flights, and has been adopted by multiple federal agencies—including the EPA, DOT, HUD, and DOD—as the most reliable way to assess how aircraft noise affects surrounding communities. The FAA formally incorporated DNL into federal regulation through FAR Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, in 1981.
    TagsDNL65, EPA, FAA, Noise, Part 150FolderNoise
  • 1990-01-08

    FAA role in use of land at Sea-Tac

    ★
    A January 1990 FAA briefing document outlines the agency's role in land use at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, explaining that federal involvement stems from approximately $115 million in federal funds spent on the airport since 1970 for planning, land acquisition, construction, and noise insulation. The FAA supported the concept of a park on airport land, provided the Port of Seattle maintained ownership and control, airport funds were not used for the park, and only compatible uses were allowed. The document also details Sea-Tac's noise mitigation efforts, including over $50 million in federal grants to acquire roughly 750 noise-impacted land parcels and more than $7 million to insulate 323 homes near the airport.
    CategoriesKey Documents TagsADAP, AIP, ASNAA, FAA, FAAP, Land Use, Noise, North Sea-Tac Park, PGPFolderFAA
  • 1990-01-01

    ANCA Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 cover page

    This is a page from the United States Code Annotated showing the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA), Title 49, Subtitle VII, Chapter 475, Subchapter II. It includes Congressional findings (§ 47521) on aviation noise management and national noise policy, and definitions (§ 47522) including 'stage 3 noise levels' as defined in 14 CFR Part 36 effective November 5, 1990.
    TagsAirport Noise Capacity Act, Airport Noise Law, ANCA, Federal Aviation Administration, NoiseFolderFederal
  • 1988-10-25

    Resolution No. 3032: Amending Section IV of Resolution 3016 regarding the Noise Management Project for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Resolution No. 3032, adopted by the Port of Seattle Commission on October 25, 1988, amends an earlier resolution (No. 3016) concerning noise management at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The key change gives the negotiating committee—known as the Joint Committee on Aircraft Overflights—the freedom to select their own neutral convener (mediator) from at least three interviewed candidates, rather than being restricted as under the previous rules. The chosen convener would be retained for up to four months to organize a mediation process, ensure all relevant parties are represented, and report regularly to the Port Commission on progress.
    TagsNoise, Port Of Seattle, Port Of Seattle Commission, Sea-Tac AirportFolderNoise Mitigation
  • 1984-07-19

    Letter to Port Of Seattle Commissioners supporting acquisition on 26th Ave. South

    In July 1984, homeowners on 26th Ave. South near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport wrote to Port of Seattle Commissioners supporting the acquisition of their properties under the Noise Remedy program, citing increasing aircraft noise, growing industrial traffic hazards, and uncertainty that had delayed home maintenance. A separate letter from the Port's Director of Aviation to an airline captain acknowledged that non-compliance with existing noise abatement procedures — such as aircraft flying lower or turning sooner than prescribed — was a significant community concern, and noted that the Port was developing computer software using FAA radar data to automatically detect and report such violations.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsNoise, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Update, Port Of Seattle, seatacFolderNoise Remedy Update
  • 1984-06-22

    Letter from United Airlines to Mr. Vernon L. Ljungren, Seattle-Tacoma Int’l Airport, Regarding Noise Abatement Procedures Survey

    In a June 22, 1984 letter to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, United Airlines Vice President Captain M. E. Volz requested information about the airport's noise-sensitive areas and any formal or informal noise abatement procedures in place. The airline was conducting a survey of all airports it served in order to build a computer database of noise procedures accessible to pilots at any United Airlines terminal. United Airlines asked Sea-Tac to provide copies or descriptions of its noise procedures and to send future updates to the Flight Safety Department in Chicago.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsNoise, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac Airport, seatac, United AirlinesFolderNoise
  • 1984-02-28

    FAA review letter on proposed Noise Remedy Program criteria and boundaries

    In this February 28, 1984 letter, the FAA's Northwest Mountain Region reviewed the Port of Seattle's proposed Noise Remedy Program for Sea-Tac Airport, raising concerns about the criteria used to add 44 homes to an acquisition program and 275 homes to a purchase assurance program. The FAA questioned whether the new criteria of 'buffer for airport-related development' and 'neighborhood continuity' were sufficiently justified, particularly for homes along 24th Avenue South. The agency urged that all criteria be reasonable, clearly documented, and tied to measured noise impacts, and cautioned against finalizing the purchase assurance plan before key federal policy questions were resolved.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport Improvement Program, FAA, Noise, Noise Mitigation, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderNoise Remedy Update
  • 1983-09-28

    Policy Advisory Committee minutes, September 28, 1983

    Minutes from the September 28, 1983 Policy Advisory Committee meeting at Sea-Tac Airport cover updates on noise reduction efforts, including new aircraft departure procedures, expanded noise monitoring stations, and a study on noise insulation and building codes. The committee also reviewed the 20-year Airport Master Plan, which will identify surplus Port-owned land that could be repurposed for commercial development or parks, and received updates on facilities improvements such as a new taxi holding area, completed runway safety zones, and the expanded South Satellite International Terminal.
    TagsAdvisory Committees, Noise, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Update, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderNoise Remedy Update
  • 1983-04-28

    Sea-Tac Threat News: Noise Is an Issue Whose Time Has Come

    This April 1983 newsletter from the SeaTac Threat community group outlines residents' opposition to airport noise and related Port of Seattle (POS) policies. It covers meetings where members agreed to resist relaxed density guidelines near North SeaTac Park, push for community-appointed representatives on the Policy Advisory Committee, and make noise a key issue in upcoming municipal, county, and state elections. The newsletter also announces a series of public meetings where the POS will present its Noise Remedy Study Plan, urging residents to attend and participate.
    TagsCASE, Noise, Policy Advisory Committee, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFolderNewsletters

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 … Page 27
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V