Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMiller Creek(252)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH 307: Draft Meeting Notes – Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway, Oct 30, 2001

    These draft meeting notes from October 30, 2001 document a technical review session in which Port of Seattle consultants disclosed and explained several errors found in the low streamflow modeling for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. The key errors included a 1/24th magnitude conversion factor mistake in embankment fill data input, incorrect input files used for embankment modeling, and an overlap in which approximately 8 acres of the Walker Creek embankment appeared to be counted in both the Hydrus embankment model and the HSPF stream model. The meeting outlined corrective steps to be taken by the Port's consulting team to fix these errors before finalizing the revised Low Streamflow Analysis required under 401 Permit conditions.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR023792: Notes HSPF Modeling Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks — HSPF/Hydrus/Slice Linkages

    This technical memo from Hydrocomp, Inc. (authored by Norm Crawford) outlines recommendations for improving hydrological computer modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's new runway construction. It describes how rainfall and runoff from the new impervious runway and taxiway surfaces and surrounding pervious grasslands are tracked through a linked series of models (HSPF, Hydrus, and Slice) to estimate groundwater movement and seepage through underlying soil layers. The document identifies several discrepancies in the existing model setup and recommends corrections to better account for water flow paths, drainage areas, and groundwater recharge in the fill areas created by airport expansion.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR026132: Letter to Ecology Requesting Extension Low Streamflow Analysis & Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    In this October 24, 2001 letter, the Port of Seattle notified the Washington Department of Ecology of a mathematical error discovered in hydrological modeling software used to assess the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan's impacts on Miller and Walker Creeks. The error caused stream flow impacts to be overestimated at 1/24th of their actual value, meaning required mitigation facilities could be smaller than originally planned. As a result, the Port requested an extension of the Low Streamflow Analysis submittal deadline from November 5 to November 21, 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-11

    EXH AR006437: Declaration of Amanda Azous in Support of ACC’s Sur-Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Amanda Azous filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Azous argues Port Of Seattle’s wetland hydrologic monitoring is inadequate for Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Document addresses Wetlands
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006788: Declaration of Amanda Azous in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Amanda Azous filed in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) in support of ACC’s reply on motion for stay of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Azous asserts scientifically substantiated harmful impacts to Miller Creek, Walker
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 007256: Declaration of Dr. John Strand in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Dr. John Strand, Principal Biologist for Columbia Biological Assessments, filed in PCHB cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, in support of ACC’s motion to stay Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) issued by Washington Department of Ecology for USACOE Public Notice 1996-4-02325 regarding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Strand addresses metals exceedances — copper,
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-05

    EXH AR052146: Draft Memorandum — Summary of Analytical Results from 1-14-99 Storm Water Sampling, STIA Receiving Streams

    Draft memorandum dated October 5, 2001, from Todd Pollard and Linda Logan to Port Of Seattle project files (project number 556-2625-002), summarizing chemical analysis of STIA receiving stream samples collected January 14, 1999 during a storm event with 86-hour antecedent dry period and 1.18 inches of rainfall. Samples collected from 8 locations including SDS-3, Miller
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 22
  • 2001-10-01

    PCHB 01-133: Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, Port Of Seattle’s Memo Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Paul S. Fendt (Parametrix, Inc.) filed in PCHB No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Fendt, a stormwater engineer with 18+ years experience, addresses stormwater management and low flow mitigation for the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update (MPU). Covers hydrology of Miller Creek watershed (8.1 sq mi,
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 05
  • 2001-09-27

    EXH 299: Paul S. Fendt PE — Professional Resume and Project Experience

    This document is a professional resume for Paul S. Fendt, P.E., a geological engineer with over 18 years of stormwater engineering experience. It highlights his role as Parametrix Project Manager supporting the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update, which involved environmental permitting, wetland mitigation, and stormwater management planning for projects including a new third runway. His Sea-Tac work encompassed hydrologic modeling, stormwater treatment facility design, and creek relocation and restoration efforts related to airport redevelopment.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-09-21

    EXH AR021666: Declaration Dr. John Strand Supporting ACC Reply Motion Stay PCHB 01-133 01-160

    Dr. John Strand, a fisheries biologist, submitted this declaration to the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board challenging the state Department of Ecology's water quality certification for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. He argues that stormwater runoff from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport contains copper, lead, and zinc at levels exceeding Washington State Water Quality Criteria, citing the Port of Seattle's own 1995-1996 data showing metals concentrations downstream of airport outfalls far above allowable limits. The declaration was filed in support of the Airport Communities Coalition, representing several cities neighboring the airport, in their motion to stay the certification.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 … Page 26
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V