2025-01-21
Washington Senate Bill 5380 (2025) requires state agencies to evaluate environmental justice impacts when reviewing permits for industrial or potentially harmful projects located in pollution-burdened communities. It mandates the completion of an Environmental Justice Impact Statement and a public hearing within affected communities before project approvals can move forward. The bill aims to reduce cumulative environmental and health disparities across Washington State.
1How to provide effective public comment by December 13, 2024 Because new ways for you to participate will likely become available, this article may be subject to updates. Introduction This is the second of a two-part article concerning the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Draft Environmental Assessment (SAMP Draft EA). If you’re looking for the short
Preparing for the October 21st Comment Period This is the first of a two-part article concerning the SAMP comment period. We’re including a few paragraphs of background because the process has been so lengthy–with many years of delay. The feedback we’ve received thus far has been confusion, partly because the information on the Port’s official
2024-05-11
The U.S. Navy announced its decision to expand EA-18G Growler jet operations at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington, by adding 36 aircraft and increasing flight training activities at both Ault Field and Outlying Landing Field Coupeville. Under the chosen plan (Alternative 2A), 80% of field carrier landing practice sessions will occur at OLF Coupeville, with noise-reduction measures included to limit community impact. The full Environmental Impact Statement and supporting documents were made available on the project website in September 2018.
2024-05-07
This document is a review by ABCx2 of a Port of Seattle presentation to the city of Burien regarding the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement. It raises concerns about the Port's decision to limit its environmental review of airport impacts to 2018 rather than 2012, questions whether significant construction growth and flight increases during that period were properly analyzed under federal (NEPA) and state (SEPA) environmental law, and challenges the Port's characterization of the FAR Part 150 noise abatement process as purely voluntary. The document also examines potential consequences if the Port fails to meet noise mitigation commitments tied to federal funding.