Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1998-12-08

    EXH AR026486: Memo – Site-Specific Copper Translator Development

    This December 1998 internal memorandum from Justin Kophs to Linda Logan outlines options for developing a site-specific copper translator for the Port of Seattle, summarizing EPA guidance on dissolved and total recoverable metal sampling studies. It describes recommended approaches including field partitioning studies, historical data equations, and laboratory mixing tests to measure how copper partitions between dissolved and total recoverable forms in receiving water. The memo notes that while a site-specific translator improves compliance measurement accuracy, it cannot be used to influence permit limits in the same way as a Water Effect Ratio (WER).
    TagsACC, Ecology, EPA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1998-11-25

    Exhibit 202: Recommendation for Reclassification of Tom Luster — Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program

    A 1998 internal memorandum from Washington State's Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program recommends reclassifying employee Tom Luster from Environmental Specialist 4 to Environmental Specialist 5, citing his assumption of higher-level duties following a colleague's departure in 1997. Luster's qualifications, including a Master's degree in Geography and over 10 years of experience, along with the cost-neutral budget impact, are presented as justification for the upgrade.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, Third Runway
  • 1998-11-21

    EXH AR033728: Ecology Water Quality Program — Relationship Between Clean Water Act Sections 401 and 402

    Email from Steve Saunders (November 21, 1998) to Melodie Selby, Robert Barwin, John Glynn, Carl Nuechterlein, and others, recommending that Melodie Selby and Bill Moore take lead on CWA Sections 401 and 402 coordination due to stormwater and BMP manual focus. Attached is a Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program summary memo analyzing
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-11-01

    Exhibit 2089: Annual Stormwater Monitoring Report for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, June 1997–June 1998

    Annual Stormwater Monitoring Report for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) covering the period June 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998, prepared by Port of Seattle, received by Washington State Department of Ecology on December 1, 1998 (AR 033384). Report covers stormwater sampling results from airport subbasins including SDN2, SDS1, SDE4, and Taxi Yard; analytes include fats/oils/grease
    TagsACC, Deicing, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater
  • 1998-10-29

    EXH AR033731: Email from Tom Luster to Lisa Zinner re 401/Water Quality/Stormwater Issues at Sea-Tac Airport Review

    Email dated October 29, 1998 from Tom Luster to Lisa Zinner (Washington State Department of Ecology) requesting review of a draft 3-page memo summarizing 401/stormwater water quality issues that arose during the SeaTac airport review and a WQ Program/SEA Program meeting. Luster describes it as his ‘401-biased’ view and requests confidential review, asking Zinner not
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-10-29

    Exhibit 2112: Draft Memo on 401 Certification, Water Quality, and Stormwater — Sea-Tac Airport Review

    Draft internal memo dated October 29, 1998 from Tom Luster to Gordon White, Paula Ehlers, and Tom McDonald at Washington State Department of Ecology (Exhibit 2112, AR 033725–033727). Addresses two issues arising from Ecology’s 401 certification review of Sea-Tac Airport (Port of Seattle): (1) whether WAC 173-201A-160(3) water quality standards require stormwater discharges to meet
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-09-28

    EXH AR024343: Letter to Ecology — Stormwater Detention, Treatment, Copper, First Flush, Wetland Delineation, Water Rights

    In a September 28, 1998 letter from the Port of Seattle to the Washington Department of Ecology, the Port provides a status update on stormwater management efforts at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, covering detention, treatment, copper loading, and first flush analysis. The letter outlines proposed delivery dates for required reports and explains the complexity of treating stormwater runoff, including challenges related to mandatory FAA-regulated de-icing and anti-icing chemicals used on runways. It also addresses the status of ongoing wetland delineations and water rights reviews connected to the airport's planned third runway construction.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 1998-09-14

    EXH AR023654: Draft Internal Email — 401 Water Quality Certs & Stormwater Discharges

    A 1998 internal email from Washington State Department of Ecology staff raises concerns that standard stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) may not provide sufficient water quality treatment to meet state and federal Clean Water Act standards for projects requiring 401 Water Quality Certification. The author warns that issuing 401 certifications while knowingly allowing water quality criteria to go unmet would be legally indefensible, and calls for updated policy guidance, better technical assistance, and clearer requirements for applicants. The email proposes that projects involving waters of the state be held to stricter stormwater treatment standards than upland projects not requiring a 401 certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-09-11

    EXH AR023653: Email – Stormwater Meeting 10/17, 401 Permit & Water Quality Standards

    A 1998 internal email exchange between Washington State environmental officials discusses an urgent regulatory problem that arose during the SeaTac Airport project: stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) were found to be inadequate to meet Water Quality Standards, meaning 401 water quality permits could not legally be issued. The Attorney General's office confirmed that 401 permits cannot be granted when stormwater BMPs fail to meet standards at the discharge point, affecting most permit decisions at the time. Officials urged that the issue be added to the agenda of a September 17, 1998 Stormwater Coordination meeting to begin resolving how to handle 401 permits when stormwater concerns arise.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-09-10

    EXH AR028387: Letter from Washington Attorney General (Ecology Division) to Foster Pepper & Shefelman Re: 401 Certification Clarification, Ecology Order No. 96-4-02325

    Letter dated September 10, 1998 from Christine O. Gregoire’s Attorney General of Washington Ecology Division (author not individually named) to J. Tayloe Washburn of Foster Pepper & Shefelman responding to an August 11, 1998 memorandum requesting clarification and minor revisions to Ecology’s 401 certification (Order No. 96-4-02325) for Sea-Tac Airport improvements including the third runway.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "The Rush" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V