Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-03-01

    Addressing community health concerns around SeaTac Airport: Response to the question, ‘Is it possible to monitor jet engine exhaust emissions or to model their path using data on prevailing winds and takeoff patterns?’

    This March 2000 report, prepared by Washington State health and environmental agencies, examines whether jet engine exhaust emissions from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport can be monitored or modeled using wind and takeoff data. It reviews previous air quality studies, outlines health and environmental justice concerns for nearby communities, and recommends a structured air quality monitoring study with specific methods, data analysis approaches, and estimated costs. The report was developed in consultation with community representatives, the EPA, and local universities.
    TagsEcology, EPA, John Williamson, King County Public Health, PSCAA, University Of Washington, Washington State Department Of Health, Washington State University
  • 2000-02-28

    EXH AR024775: Draft Memo Range-Finding WERs Miller and Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 draft memorandum from Parametrix, Inc. outlines a scope and budget for range-finding Water-Effect Ratio (WER) studies using receiving water from Miller and Des Moines Creeks, conducted in connection with stormwater discharge permitting near the Port. The studies involve acute toxicity tests with copper-spiked water to determine whether site-specific water quality standards could be higher than generic state standards, potentially eliminating the need for a mixing zone. Estimated costs range from $2,110 for one creek site to $2,650 for two sites.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2000-02-17

    Exhibit 173: Email — Meeting with Jim Kelley (Parametrix) Re Third Runway Public Comments on Wetland Mitigation Ratios

    Email from Erik Stockdale (Ecology NWRO) to Raymond Hellwig and Tom Luster, dated February 17, 2000, summarizing a February 15 meeting with Jim Kelley of Parametrix regarding public comments on the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project (AR 018438–018440, Exhibit 173). Issues raised by commenters Sarah Cooke and Andy Castelle concerned incorrect wetland mitigation ratio calculations
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2000-02-14

    EXH AR024917: Draft Memo — Site-Specific WQC Status Update, Copper, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 draft memorandum from environmental consultants to Keith Smith summarizes efforts to develop a site-specific water quality criterion for copper in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma Airport, in anticipation of stormwater runoff from a proposed third runway. The memo outlines two technical approaches—the Water-Effect Ratio (WER) and the site-specific metals translator—for potentially raising copper discharge permit limits, and describes toxicity screening and range-finding studies conducted in 1999. The phased study approach was designed to avoid unnecessary costs if the WER method proved infeasible or if the Washington Department of Ecology would not permit its use in adjusting permit limits.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-02-10

    EXH AR034771: State of Washington Alternative Mitigation Policy Guidance for Aquatic Permitting Requirements from the Departments of Ecology and Fish and Wildlife

    State of Washington interagency policy guidance (AR 034771, Exhibit 2193) adopted by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) for evaluating aquatic mitigation alternatives under section 401 of the Clean Water Act, the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58), and the Hydraulic Code (RCW 75.20). Covers mitigation sequencing (avoiding, minimizing,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, State of Washington, WSDOT
  • 2000-02-08

    Exhibit 82: Email Chain RE Fill Criteria for the Third Runway — Ecology/Port Of Seattle Financial Arrangement Discussion

    Email chain dated February 8, 2000 among Washington State Department of Ecology staff (Roger Nye, Raymond Hellwig, Steve Alexander) regarding fill criteria compliance for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Roger Nye describes the 401/404 permit fill acceptance policy developed with Port Of Seattle governing contaminant criteria for borrow sources used in Third Runway construction
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2000-02-01

    EXH AR044214: Quarterly Ground Water Level Measurements, C1 (Qva) Monitoring Well Network, Ground Water Study, STIA

    Letter dated February 1, 2000 from John Strunk, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI Project No. BV97016D) to Roger Nye, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, submitting first and second quarter ground water level measurements from the C1 (Qva) aquifer monitoring well network at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Reports on six pressure transducers installed in the
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Water Quality
  • 2000-01-31

    EXH AR044092: Memorandum — Response to Ecology Comments on Conceptual Flow Model Boundary Presentation, Ground Water Study, STIA

    Memorandum BV97016D dated January 31, 2000, from John Strunk (Associated Earth Sciences Inc.) and Mike Riley (S.S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc.) to Roger Nye, Department of Ecology, responding to nine Ecology comments on the Conceptual Flow Model Boundary Presentation for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport ground water study. Topics addressed include MODFLOW model setup covering approximately
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2000-01-24

    Exhibit 207: Desk Manual for Ecology’s Federal Permit Team — 401/CZM Review

    This is a procedural desk manual for Washington State Department of Ecology's Federal Permit Team, outlining how staff should review and process Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and Coastal Zone Management (CZM) consistency determinations for federally permitted projects. It covers application procedures, public notice requirements, review timelines, and technical guidance for evaluating impacts to water quality, wetlands, and sediments. This document does not contain content related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, SEPA, Water Quality
  • 2000-01-24

    EXH AR032610: Desk Manual for Ecology’s Federal Permit Team 401/CZM Review

    Desk Manual for Washington State Department of Ecology’s Federal Permit Team covering Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and Coastal Zone Management Act (CZM) consistency determinations. Covers SEPA compliance, JARPA application procedures, public notice and hearings, permit review timelines, waivers, 303(d)-listed waters, wetlands mitigation, sediment management standards, Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis (PSDDA), NPDES coordination, antidegradation,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, SEPA, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Sea-Tac Airport expects traffic records to fall this summer" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V