Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-01-12

    Exhibit 2116 AR033733: Email on Sea-Tac Clean Water Act Section 401/402 Split

    Internal email from Tom Luster to Kevin Fitzpatrick dated January 12, 2000, discussing the legal distinction between Clean Water Act Section 401(d) and Section 402(a) as applied to Sea-Tac Airport water quality (WQ) and State Environmental Policy Act (SEA/SEPA) policies. Email quotes statutory language verbatim: 401(d) uses mandatory ‘shall’ language for effluent limitations and monitoring
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Water Quality
  • 1999-12-13

    EXH 331: Letter to WA Dept of Ecology — MTCA Groundwater Study Potential Sites Table, STIA

    A December 1999 letter from Port of Seattle Senior Environmental Program Manager Paul W. Agid to the Washington Department of Ecology transmits a 'potential sites' table and map identifying locations at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport where historical operations may have caused soil or groundwater contamination. The document, compiled in compliance with an Agreed Order under Washington's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), lists twelve potential sites including former gas stations, fuel tanks, hydrant lines, and maintenance areas. The sites were identified based on past operational activities that had since been discontinued or modified prior to current environmental regulations.
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1999-12-13

    1998/1999 SeaTac oxides of nitrogen and particulate monitoring study

    This 1998/1999 study by the Washington State Department of Ecology monitored levels of oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter in the SeaTac area, likely in relation to emissions from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and surrounding traffic. Prepared by Jim Frost and Doug Knowlton of Ecology's Air Program, the report assessed local air quality conditions during that period. It serves as a technical reference for understanding pollution levels near the airport in the late 1990s.
    TagsDoug Knowlton, Ecology, Jim Frost, pollutionStudy TopicsAir Quality
  • 1999-12-02

    EXH AR026984: Ground Water Flow Map – C1 Aquifer, Ground Water Study, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Ground Water Flow Map for the C1 Aquifer prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (project no. 8V07019, figure 7) as part of a Ground Water Study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, dated 12/02/99. The map covers the Sea-Tac Airport area including Normandy Park, City of SeaTac, Tukwila, Des Moines, and surrounding Puget Sound shorelines. Shows ground
    TagsACC, Ecology, Map, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1999-10-29

    Exhibit 213: DRAFT Sea-Tac Issues Short List – Unresolved 401/402 Stormwater, Water Quality, and Permitting Issues (October 1999)

    This October 1999 draft document outlines resolved and unresolved regulatory issues related to a Sea-Tac Airport expansion project, focusing primarily on stormwater management, wetland mitigation, and water quality concerns. Key unresolved issues include compliance with Ecology and King County Stormwater Manuals, the role of a proposed Regional Detention Facility (RDF) in wetlands, de-icing impacts on dissolved oxygen levels, and instream flow reductions in Des Moines Creek. Additional concerns involve NPDES permit compliance, clean fill criteria, legal proceedings before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, and whether a shoreline permit is needed for an Auburn mitigation site.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1999-10-21

    EXH AR042698: Sea-Tac Airport Dissolved Oxygen Deicing Study and Ecology Response Letter

    Dissolved Oxygen Deicing Study prepared by Cosmopolitan Engineering Group for Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport (AR042698, August 1999), examining impacts of de-icing agents from airport stormwater runoff on Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek, including BOD5 discharges to NW Ponds and Lake Reba. Accompanied by Washington State Department of Ecology (NWRO) response letter dated
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-10-21

    EXH AR023797: Ecology Letter – Dissolved Oxygen De-Icing Study Final Draft, STIA

    In this October 1999 letter, the Washington State Department of Ecology reviewed a study by the Port of Seattle examining how de-icing chemicals used at Sea-Tac International Airport affect water quality in Miller and Des Moines Creeks. Ecology found significant deficiencies in the study, including incorrect water quality classifications, too few de-icing events sampled, and inadequate monitoring methods, concluding that dissolved oxygen levels in both creeks frequently failed to meet applicable standards. The agency requested that the Port resubmit the study with corrections before a determination could be made about whether de-icing operations were being properly managed to protect local waterways.
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-10-20

    EXH AR023711: Internal Email — Tom Luster on Sea-Tac Third Runway 401 Certification and Reasonable Assurance

    In this October 1999 internal memo, Washington State Department of Ecology staffer Tom Luster describes a meeting with his supervisor Paula regarding the agency's water quality review of Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Luster explains that he cannot yet provide 'reasonable assurance' that the Port of Seattle's proposal will meet water quality standards for Des Moines Creek, citing inadequate stormwater treatment plans and the Port's removal of flow augmentation measures from its mitigation plan. He expresses concern that management pressure to approve the project quickly could compromise the integrity of the regulatory review process.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1999-09-17

    Exhibit 165: RE: Sea-Tac Third Runway — 401 Certification Timing and Governor’s Commitment

    Email chain from Raymond Hellwig (Washington State Department of Ecology) to Thomas Fitzsimmons and Bill Alkire, cc’ing Carol Jolly, Ron Langley, Tom Luster, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Dave Garland, Erik Stockdale, Roger Nye, and Paul David Carr, dated September 17, 1999. Discusses Governor’s reported commitment to Sea-Tac legislators (Paterson et al.) that the Section 401 Water Quality
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 1999-09-16

    Exhibit 2115: Internal Email — Ecology on Sea-Tac Water Quality Standards Compliance, Des Moines Creek 401 Certification

    Internal email from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Paula Ehlers, dated September 16, 1999, regarding SeaTac Airport 401 certification and compliance with water quality standards under the Clean Water Act. Discusses non-attainment of water quality standards in Des Moines Creek and Miller Creek, antidegradation requirements, Level 2 detention requirements,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Cliff Mass: If You Worry About Climate Change and Care About the Environment, Vote No on I-1631" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V