Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-07-24

    EXH AR029208: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis

    Final meeting notes from July 24, 2001 conference call on 401 Permit Decision-Making for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway, Low Flow Analysis. Prepared by Kate Snider, Floyd & Snider Inc. Attendees included Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Paul Fendt (Parametrix), Joe Brascher (Aquaterra). Discusses Port of
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin Plan, Water QualityFolderBox 11
  • 2001-07-24

    EXH AR050691: Installation and Verification Results, Work Area 2 Stone Column Test Areas, Third Runway Embankment Phase 4, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Hart Crowser report (project 4978-44) prepared for HNTB documenting installation and verification results for Work Area 2 stone column test areas at the Third Runway Embankment Phase 4, SeaTac, Washington. Authored by Barry S. Chen, Ph.D., P.E. (Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer) and John P. Laplante (Senior Staff Geotechnical Engineer). Report covers four test areas with
    TagsACC, Construction, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-07-23

    EXH AR051729: Low Flow Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Sea-Tac Airport

    Port of Seattle letter dated July 23, 2001 to Ann E. Kenny, Washington State Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office, summarizing low streamflow impact analysis and flow impact offset facility proposal for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update projects. Prepared by Parametrix, Inc. Analysis covers summer low streamflow impacts to Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek,
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 22
  • 2001-07-23

    EXH 235: Follow-up Comments Low Streamflow Analyses — ACC Letter to Ecology

    In a July 2001 letter to the Washington State Department of Ecology, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants raised concerns on behalf of the Airport Community Coalition that the Port of Seattle's ongoing low streamflow analyses for Des Moines, Walker, and Miller Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport were likely underestimating the airport's impact on local waterways. The consultants argued that the models were poorly calibrated for upper-basin conditions and failed to account for post-1994 improvements to the Industrial Wastewater System or the future loss of forested areas due to planned airport development. They requested that a final report on the streamflow analysis and any proposed mitigation measures be made available for public comment before Ecology used it to make its 401 Certification decision.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 08
  • 2001-07-23

    EXH AR029214: Port Of Seattle Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Sea-Tac Airport

    Letter dated July 23, 2001 from Port Of Seattle to Ann E. Kenny at Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office regarding Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Covers summer low streamflow impacts in Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, and Walker Creek from airport Master
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 11
  • 2001-07-23

    EXH AR050780: Assessment of the Existing and Future Hydrologic Divide of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks After Construction of Master Plan Update Projects at STIA

    Parametrix, Inc. report prepared for Port Of Seattle assessing the existing (1994) and future (2006) hydrologic divide of Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek following Master Plan Update (MPU) construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Analyzes compliance with Governor’s Certification requirement that the third runway project will not cause changes in the location
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-07-19

    EXH AR018498: Port Of Seattle Parcel 92 Condemnation — Prior Converted Croplands Wetland Ruling and Lora Lake Mitigation Credit Discussion

    Email chain (AR018498–AR018499) dated July 19, 2001, from Erik Stockdale (likely Washington State Department of Ecology) to Joan Marchioro (ATG) and Andy McMillan, forwarding a message from Jim Kelley of Parametrix, Inc. The judge ruled in favor of Port Of Seattle in the Parcel 92 condemnation case, finding that prior converted croplands were wetlands under
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Lora Lake, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 08
  • 2001-07-18

    EXH AR021192: Supplemental Info Letter Stormwater BMP Performance Flow Augmentation STIA Sec 404 Permit App

    A water resources consultant raised concerns in a July 2001 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology about the Port of Seattle's stormwater management plans for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The letter challenged the effectiveness of proposed biofiltration swales, noting they can actually increase bacterial levels rather than reduce them, and warned that releasing stored stormwater from detention vaults into nearby Class AA streams could discharge pollutant-laden, oxygen-depleted water into already stressed waterways. The consultant concluded that the Port's plans fell short of providing reasonable assurance that water quality standards would be met.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-07-18

    EXH AR023721: ACC Counsel to Ecology — Lack of PDA Document Production, STIA Third Runway 401 Certification Review

    A July 18, 2001 letter from Helsell Fetterman law firm to the Washington State Department of Ecology complains that the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), representing over 150,000 residents near Sea-Tac Airport, had not received any Public Disclosure Act documents from Ecology's Northwest Regional Office for over a month during the critical review of the Sea-Tac Third Runway project. The letter specifically highlights that a key contaminants pathways analysis dated June 19, 2001 was withheld for weeks, preventing ACC's independent scientific experts from providing timely comments on potential environmental and contamination risks. The attorneys urge Ecology to halt issuing a Section 401 water quality certification decision until the document disclosure cutoff is reversed and ACC's scientists have had a fair opportunity to review and respond to the Port's latest submissions.
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Public Records, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-07-18

    EXH AR017928: Memo to Governor Gary Locke — Port Of Seattle Proposed Third Runway and Associated Projects, Status of Decision Making Process

    Memo dated July 18, 2001 from Tom Fitzsimmons, Director, Washington State Department of Ecology, to Governor Gary Locke regarding the status of the 401 Water Quality Certification decision for the Port Of Seattle proposed Third Runway and associated projects. Ecology is awaiting final technical information from Port consultants on stream low-flow mitigation requirements, expected by
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Summary of Sea-Tac International Airport Noise Remedy Update workshops" — , 1983

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V