Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 248: NHC Letter to USACE — ACC Technical Review Low Streamflow Analysis, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A January 2002 technical letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis for SeaTac Airport, identifying serious modeling errors that led to underestimated impacts on Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. Key flaws include double-counting of groundwater discharges in the Miller Creek model, inconsistent methodology for assessing embankment seepage, and failure to account for updated construction methods. The letter was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 283: ACC & CASE v. DOE & POS, PCHB No. 01-060 — Proposed Deposition Schedule Updated Jan. 30, 2002

    This document contains an email exchange from January 30, 2002, between legal staff at Helsell Fetterman and Foster Pepper law firms coordinating a deposition schedule for the case ACC & CASE v. DOE & POS (PCHB No. 01-060). The emails confirm scheduling adjustments, including moving Linda Logan's deposition start time to 10:00 a.m. and removing Joe Stohr (a Washington State Department of Ecology employee) from the February 19 schedule. An attached calendar lists numerous depositions scheduled between January 28 and February 23, 2002, with witnesses deposed alternately at Foster Pepper and Helsell Fetterman offices.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 411: NHC Letter to US Army Corps Engineers Low Streamflow Analysis Miller Creek Walker Creek Des Moines Creek

    A January 2002 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis related to Sea-Tac Airport's third runway development. The letter identifies critical flaws in hydrologic modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks, including double-counting of groundwater discharges, flawed seepage modeling methodology, and failure to account for construction impacts on stream low flows. The consultants argue these errors cause the Port to substantially underestimate the project's negative impacts on local stream flows.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH AR004627: ACC and CASE Reply in Support of Certificate of Appealability, PCHB No. 01-160

    Reply brief filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, in support of their Request for Certificate of Appealability and Application for Direct Review by the Court of Appeals. Filed January 30, 2002. Argues under RCW 34.05.518(3)(b) that detrimental delay, fundamental
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH AR053384: SSA Study Baseflow Sample Results

    SSA Study Baseflow Sample Results data tables (mg/l) from 2/19/02 Preliminary Draft, dated 1/30/02, covering water quality sampling at stations including DMEssa, NPool, DMKCwelr, MCssa, MC8h, WCjcN, WCcpS, WC171tst, Reba, and others. Parameters include pH, alk, hard, TSS, DOC, Ca2+, Mg2+, d-Cu, TR-Cu, d-Zn, TR-Zn, d-Cd, TR-Cd, TR-Cr, TR-Pb, TR-Ni across baseflow events (BF1-1 through
    TagsACC, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 22
  • 2002-01-29

    EXH AR004685: ACC’s Reply on Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Absence of a Water Right for Third Runway § 401 Certification

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply brief filed January 29, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), State of Washington, supporting ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the absence of a water right for the Third Runway Section 401 Water Quality Certification (#1996-4-02325). ACC argues the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH AR026431: Absorbent Boom in Stream Below SDS1 Outfall — Turbid Effluent Photos, Jan 28, 2002

    Two photographs taken by P. Willing on January 28, 2002, document an absorbent boom placed in a stream below the SDS1 outfall, a pollution-control measure used to contain contaminants. The second photo highlights turbid (murky) effluent visible in the stream, indicating water quality concerns at the site. These images appear to be part of an environmental monitoring or spill-response record associated with drainage infrastructure near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH I: Standing Water on Fill Embankment S 160th St 28 Jan 2002

    This exhibit, part of K.M. Leytham's pre-filed testimony in PCHB No. 01-160, shows photographs taken on January 28, 2002, documenting standing water on top of a fill embankment near South 160th Street. The images provide visual evidence of water pooling conditions on the embankment surface, likely related to construction or environmental concerns associated with Sea-Tac Airport development. This material was submitted as part of a formal hearing record before the Pollution Control Hearings Board.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH AR026300: Exposed Fill Embankment S 160th St Slope Failure — Layering and Lack of Homogeneity, 28 Jan 2002

    This exhibit, part of K.M. Leytham's pre-filed testimony (PCHB No. 01-160), shows a photograph taken on January 28, 2002, of an exposed fill embankment face near South 160th Street where a slope failure occurred. The image, approximately 4 feet high by 3 feet wide, reveals distinct layering and a lack of uniformity in the fill material. This evidence was submitted in connection with proceedings related to Sea-Tac Airport development and its surrounding infrastructure impacts.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH AR027041: Photographs by Peter Eglick During Site Visit on January 28, 2002

    Photographs taken by Peter Eglick during a site visit on January 28, 2002, filed as part of the Administrative Record (AR 027041–027043). The images show ground-level views of a dark gravelly or paved surface with water pooling and streaking, possibly documenting stormwater, contamination, or site conditions at or near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR024917: Draft Memo — Site-Specific WQC Status Update, Copper, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks" — , 2000

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V