TagACC(1531)

Pre-Hearing Order issued by the Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) in consolidated cases SHB No. 01-023, 01-024, 01-025, and 01-026. State of Washington Department of Ecology appellant; respondents are Port of Grays Harbor, Mox Chehalis LLC, and City of Westport; intervenors are Friends of Grays Harbor and Wildlife Forever of Grays Harbor. Appeals concern a proposed

Letter dated January 23, 2002 from attorney Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, No. 01-160. Transmits two enclosures inadvertently omitted from Exhibit D to the Second Declaration of Michael P. Witek

This document is an Application for Site Certification for the Wallula Power Project in Washington State, submitted by Wallula Generation LLC to the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council. The application details water management plans for the proposed power plant, including how stormwater runoff from the 66-acre site will be captured, routed through oil/water separators, and reused in the plant's cooling tower basin. The applicant argues that this stormwater reuse strategy will reduce groundwater withdrawals from the local gravel aquifer with no net regional impact on water resources.

Washington State Department of Ecology memorandum opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) application for Certificate of Appealability of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Stay Order in PCHB No. 01-160. Ecology argues the Board’s stay of the § 401 Certification for the Third Runway Project (Port of Seattle) is not a ‘final decision’ under RCW 34.05.518

Declaration of Jeff Kray, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, Ecology Division, filed January 23, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) are appellants against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches two documents: (1) Amended Final Findings

Port Of Seattle’s reply brief supporting its motion to compel document production in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed January 23, 2002. Port argues ACC has produced zero documents despite Port producing 22 boxes, 23 compact discs, and 4 hard diskettes. Port

Internal memo from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny (cc: Jeannie Summerhays, Steve Alexander), dated January 23, 2002, reviewing the Port of Seattle’s Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan (EFMP) for the Third Runway, 401 Certification Condition E.3. Comments cover requirements for logic tree flow diagrams for tiered sampling and staged screening (groundwater, seepage), statistical methods for baseline

This document is an Application for Site Certification for the Wallula Power Project in Washington State, submitted by Wallula Generation LLC to the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council. It details stormwater management plans for the 66-acre project site, including capturing rainfall and routing it through oil/water separators to a detention pond for reuse in the power plant's cooling tower. The application also addresses groundwater rights, noting that captured stormwater would reduce withdrawals from the gravel aquifer and Boise Cascade Corporation fiber farm wells.

Second Declaration of Michael P. Witek, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed January 22, 2002, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160. Supports ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment challenging Section 401 Water Quality Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, by Washington State Department of Ecology related

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 discovery order dated January 22, 2002, resolving four motions: ACC’s motion to compel inspection of Port Of Seattle airport property, ACC’s motion to extend discovery schedule, Port Of Seattle’s motion to compel depositions and limit entry onto land, and Port Of Seattle’s motion to compel production of documents