Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1999-03-24

    EXH AR019665: Hamm Creek Soil Quality Review — Memo Doan to Agid

    A 1999 internal Port of Seattle memorandum reviews soil quality data for the Hamm Creek Restoration Project site near Boeing Field, evaluating whether the material is safe to use as fill for a proposed third runway. The review found that detected contaminants — including PCBs, DDTs, mercury, and PAHs — fell below MTCA cleanup levels, leading to the conclusion that the material is suitable for upland fill use. While the soil did not meet PSDDA standards for open-water disposal, the memo notes that this distinction is not technically relevant given its intended use as runway fill.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 1999-03-17

    EXH AR023763: Internal Email – Third Runway Excavation Material Disposal Site Options

    A March 1999 internal email from Patrick Cagney of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers discusses potential disposal sites for excavated soil material related to a construction project near Seattle. Three options were identified: the Port of Seattle's third runway project (no tipping fee, hauling costs only), ProCon at 16 miles away (costs ranging from $32–$124 depending on truck size and material wetness), and Sunset at 13 miles away ($1.75 per yard). The email notes that hauling distances would be the primary cost driver across all options.
    TagsACC, Construction, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-03-16

    EXH 385: HartCrowser Calculations — 3R Wall Alternative Selection, S+W Peer Review

    This is a HartCrowser engineering calculations document dated 3/16/99, related to a '3R Wall Alternative Selection Process' peer review. It contains technical notes on retaining wall construction considerations, including settlement allowances, corrosion rates, MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall facing under seismic conditions, geosynthetic material quality checks, and construction contingencies. The document also outlines action items including verbal records, memos, and specifications on plumbness and connections, with a meeting scheduled for the following week.
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 1999-03-16

    EXH AR024758: Record of Communication — WER Outline, Mixing Zones, Port Review

    A March 16, 1999 outgoing phone call was made to Elizabeth Leavitt of POS regarding her questions about the WER (Work Element Review) outline, review process, and mixing zones. Elizabeth was advised she could discuss the WER outline directly with Kevin Fitzpatrick and Mark Hicks, and that the team was preparing written thoughts on mixing zones for further discussion. The call also addressed scheduling a Port review of the WER workplan outline, with a suggestion to coordinate the review alongside a Fooogy (likely Ecology) meeting the following week.
    TagsACC, Elizabeth Leavitt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-03-11

    EXH AR023624: Roger Nye to Kathy Gerla — Ruling Request, Reinstatement Prepaid Position STIA

    A 1999 memo from Washington State Department of Ecology staff member Roger Nye to Assistant Attorney General Kathy Gerla raises legal questions about reinstating a full-time 'prepaid' regulatory position at Sea-Tac Airport, funded by the Port of Seattle. The memo outlines the history of the position from 1992–1996, noting it was cancelled due to the lack of a signed Agreed Order, and describes public concerns that the arrangement gave the Port undue influence over Ecology. Key issues flagged include whether the prepaid role can legally extend beyond the scope of an Agreed Order, whether a new Interagency Agreement is needed, and whether reinstatement would require a public comment period likely to draw strong opposition.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-03-11

    EXH AR023701: Email Chain Stormwater Compliance, 401 Certification, NPDES Permitting STIA Third Runway

    This 1999 email chain between Washington State Department of Ecology staff discusses the challenges of applying water quality standards to stormwater discharges related to the proposed Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. Officials from the Water Quality and Shorelines/Environmental Assistance programs agreed that strictly enforcing numeric water quality criteria on stormwater is scientifically and legally difficult, and recommended an 'adaptive management' approach requiring monitoring and ongoing improvements rather than immediate full compliance. The correspondence also highlights resource limitations, the relationship between Section 401 and 402 Clean Water Act permits, and the need for a consistent statewide policy on stormwater review.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-03-04

    Exhibit 2109: Email Chain RE: Friday Sea-Tac Airport Meeting on 401 Certification and Stormwater, Third Runway

    Email chain dated March 4, 1999 among Tom Luster, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Raymond Hellwig, and Paula Ehlers (Washington State Department of Ecology, NWRO) regarding a Friday meeting at the Army Corps of Engineers about Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway citizen group concerns. Attendees included Corps staff Tom Mueller, Gail Terzi, Jonathan Freedman, Siri Nelson, and citizen group
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 14
  • 1999-02-23

    EXH AR026670: Static Acute Ceriodaphnia dubia Toxicity Test — Cu, Miller Creek Site Water, Feb 1999

    This document presents results from a 48-hour acute toxicity test conducted in February 1999 for the Port of Seattle, exposing water fleas (Ceriodaphnia dubia) to copper-contaminated water collected from Miller Creek. The test found that all organisms survived at concentrations up to 50 micrograms per liter, while complete mortality occurred at concentrations of 100 micrograms per liter and above. Water quality parameters including pH, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductivity were monitored throughout the test period.
    TagsACC, Environment, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-02-16

    1999 Legislative Services Contract: ACC and Smith Alling Lane

    Cover letter dated February 16, 1999 from Robert E. Mack of Smith Alling Lane P.S. (Tacoma, WA) to Lisa Logie, Executive Director of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), transmitting a revised 1999 Legislative Services Contract for signature by Robert Sheckler, Chair of the ACC Executive Committee, along with an L1 Lobbyist Registration form. The contract,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Lobbyists, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • 1999-02-01

    EXH AR041921: Water Effect Ratio Screening Study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: Toxicity Evaluation of Site Water

    Draft report (AR 041921) prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for Port Of Seattle, STIA, summarizing procedures and results of acute screening-level Ceriodaphnia dubia bioassays conducted on site water from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport in January 1999. Samples collected January 14, 1999 during a storm event at eight locations including Miller Creek Upstream of Lake Reba, Miller Creek
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 17

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V