Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1067)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR049834: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Additional Information on the Seismic Design for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway

    Memorandum dated January 25, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist (EIT) and Michael Bailey (P.E.) of Hart Crowser, Inc. to the Embankment Technical Review Board (Attn: Pete Douglass), project J-4978-30, CC to Jim Thomson (P.E., HNTB). Provides additional information on seismic analyses for the Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) in SeaTac, Washington. Covers probabilistic seismic
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR049866: Letter from Peter M. Douglass, Technical Review Board Facilitator, Regarding Third Runway Embankment Fill and MSE Wall Design Review

    Letter dated January 25, 2001 from Peter M. Douglass, P.E. (Technical Review Board Facilitator) to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jonathan Freedman, Project Manager) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny, Environmental Specialist) summarizing findings of an independent expert panel convened by Port Of Seattle to review embankment fill and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE)
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR023689: Notes 3RW Public Meetings & Hearings Jan 26-27 2001

    These are prepared talking points for Washington State Department of Ecology officials attending public meetings on January 26-27, 2001, regarding the proposed Third Runway (3RW) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The notes address 17 anticipated public questions covering topics such as Ecology's 401 Water Quality Certification review process, the use of Port-funded consultants, SEPA compliance, wetlands impacts, and whether the project was receiving special political consideration. Officials emphasized that no approval would be granted until the project demonstrated full compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPA, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-01-24

    EXH AR023684: Letter to Ecology re MTCA Ground Water Study STIA w/ Meeting Notes Agreed Order Status 11/16/00

    A January 2001 letter and accompanying meeting notes document communications between the Port of Seattle and the Washington Department of Ecology regarding a groundwater contamination study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, conducted under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Agreed Order 97TC-N112. The records outline the scope of the study, which focuses on hydrogeologic investigation and a review of the Fuel Operations Area, and clarify that any necessary cleanup would be handled separately after the study's completion. Both parties discussed concerns about scope expansion and the process for addressing contaminated sites identified through the study.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-01-21

    Exhibit 206: Issues Related to Ecology’s Section 401 Water Quality Certification Review of the Proposed Sea-Tac Airport Expansion

    This document outlines the Washington State Department of Ecology's Section 401 Water Quality Certification review process for the proposed Sea-Tac Airport expansion, detailing the legal standards and unresolved environmental issues involved. Ecology was required to determine whether the expansion would meet state water quality standards by assessing direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on wetlands, stormwater, and streamflow, while coordinating with federal Clean Water Act permit requirements under Sections 401 and 402. As of October 2000, key aquatic resource protection issues—including stormwater management, wetland mitigation, and streamflow augmentation—remained unresolved pending additional information from the Port of Seattle.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-01-21

    Exhibit 212: Tom Luster (Ecology) Letter to Senator Julia Patterson on Sea-Tac Third Runway Section 401 Water Quality Certification Review

    In a January 2001 letter to Washington State Senator Julia Patterson, outgoing Department of Ecology official Tom Luster summarizes the key water quality issues surrounding the proposed Sea-Tac Airport expansion review under Section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act. The assessment outlines concerns including stormwater management, wetland impacts, streamflow, and whether the project's discharges would meet state water quality standards for antidegradation, beneficial uses, and numeric water quality criteria. Luster notes the views are his own and may not fully reflect Ecology's current position, directing the Senator to contact Ann Kenny at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office for the latest information.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-01-21

    Project AP4-4: United Airlines Disagreement with Third Runway Construction Project PFC Funding

    United Airlines formally disagreed with a proposed use of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) funds totaling $104.3 million toward a $587.4 million third runway construction project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The airline argued that the runway would not meaningfully improve national air transportation capacity, safety, or competition, noting that less than 30 seconds of average delay could actually be attributed to the absence of a third runway. United also raised concerns about potential improper diversion of federal transportation funds and warned that approving the project before its full costs were understood would set a harmful precedent.
    TagsPFC, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, United AirlinesFolderThird Runway
  • 2001-01-11

    Exhibit 2062: Port Of Seattle Transmittal and CZM Consistency Certification for Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport

    Port of Seattle transmittal letter dated January 11, 2001 from Environmental Manager Elizabeth Leavitt to Ann Kenny at the Washington State Department of Ecology, transmitting a revised Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Consistency Statement (Federal Project Number 96-4-02325). The CZM certification covers construction of a third runway and other improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including filling
    TagsACC, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderBox 12
  • 2001-01-11

    EXH AR049822: Port Of Seattle Transmittal and CZM Consistency Certification for Third Runway Construction at Sea-Tac Airport

    Transmittal record dated January 11, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Environmental Manager, Port Of Seattle Aviation Environmental Group, to Ann Kenny, Department of Ecology, transmitting a revised Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Consistency Statement for Federal Project Number 96-4-02325. The CZM certification covers construction of a third runway and other improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including filling
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-01-03

    EXH AR017292: Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick re Third Runway Fill and Copper Contamination

    Email dated January 3, 2001 from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick regarding copper contamination in fill soil samples from a proposed Third Runway fill source site. Beth Clark questioned use of Method B protection of groundwater standard (100X groundwater standard) for copper samples testing 70–100 mg/kg. Yee reaffirmed the Method B standard and disagreed
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 … Page 107
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port Of Seattle Commission Salaries, 2020–2023" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V