Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1084)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-05-30

    EXH AR017714: Email and Redline Revisions to Preferential Flowpath Technical Memorandum — Third Runway Construction

    Email from Ching-Pi Wang (Port Of Seattle) to Paul Agid, cc Roger Nye, dated May 30, 2001, transmitting redline edits to the May 8th draft of the preferential ground-water flowpath technical memorandum related to construction of the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Attached redlined memorandum (From Port to Ecology, May 30, 2001) addresses preferential flowpaths
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-25

    Highline district to get $200 million to fix airport-impacted schools

    By Lisa Pemberton-Butler Seattle Times staff reporter DES MOINES – School and government officials signed a $200 million deal today to reduce deafening jet noise heard in 15 schools located under the flight path of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The historic agreement — reached by the Highline School District, the Port of Seattle, the Federal
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsHighline Schools, Port Of Seattle, Seattle Times, Third Runway
  • 2001-05-25

    EXH AR029179: 401 Permit Decision-Making Technical Meeting Notes — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway, May 25, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes from a 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meeting on May 25, 2001, regarding the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway project. Prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. Attendees included Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Paul Fendt and Tom Atkins (Parametrix). Topics
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR019295: Biological Opinion — FWS Sec 7 Consultation STIA Master Plan Update (Bull Trout, Bald Eagle, Marbled Murrelet)

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a biological opinion in May 2001 evaluating the potential effects of proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on three protected species: bull trout, bald eagle, and marbled murrelet. The review was conducted under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act at the request of the Federal Aviation Administration, which had determined the project was 'not likely to adversely affect' any of the three species. The opinion covers planned airport development in the cities of SeaTac and Des Moines, along with off-site wetland mitigation near the Green River in Auburn, Washington.
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR017396: FWS Biological Opinion — Master Plan Update Improvements, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) biological opinion (FWS Reference #1-3-00-F-1420) transmitted to Lowell H. Johnson, Federal Aviation Administration, regarding effects of the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements (MPUI) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in King County, Washington on threatened bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) under Section
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR050478: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion — Master Plan Update Improvements, Sea-Tac Airport

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) biological opinion (FWS Reference #1-3-00-F-1420) transmitted to Lowell H. Johnson of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding effects of the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements (MPUI) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in King County, Washington on threatened bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-05-15

    EXH AR019757: Letter to Ecology — Third Runway Phase III Embankment Fill Summary, Q1 2001

    A May 2001 letter from the Port of Seattle's Environmental Program Manager to the Washington Department of Ecology provides a quarterly update on fill material placed at the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Embankment project. The letter presents final tonnage and calculated volumes of soil placed during the Phase III Embankment contract (May 2000 through February 2001), noting no new fill sources were received in the first quarter of 2001. An attached summary table lists all fill sources, suppliers, categories, and final volumes consistent with the 1999 Airfield Project Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-05-14

    EXH AR029174: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Technical Meeting Notes, May 14, 2001

    Final draft technical meeting notes from May 14, 2001 (1:00–4:00 PM) for the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Prepared by Kathryn Snider, Floyd & Snider Inc. Attendees included Ann Kenny and John Drabek (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Tom Atkins (Parametrix), Alan Black
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2001-05-14

    EXH AR023054: ACC Wetland Scientist Letter to Army Corps – Wetland 44a & SR509 Temp Interchange

    An independent wetland scientist, writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raised concerns with the US Army Corps of Engineers about potential mapping errors affecting Wetland 44a near the proposed SR509 Temporary Interchange for Sea-Tac Airport's Third Runway project. The letter warned that discrepancies between engineering drawings and actual field conditions could mean the wetland was closer to the construction zone than documented, risking illegal filling or sediment discharge into protected wetlands. The scientist urged the Corps to verify the wetland's true location and review erosion control measures before approving any construction permits.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SR509, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-05-14

    EXH AR050078: Draft Memorandum — Proposed Liquefaction Procedure Under Walls and Slopes, Third Runway Embankment

    Draft memorandum dated May 14, 2001, from Douglas Lindquist (E.I.T.) and Michael Bailey (P.E.) of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Pete Douglass (P.E.) and Embankment Technical Review Board (ETRB), CC Jim Thomson (P.E.) HNTB, project 4978-30. Describes proposed liquefaction potential evaluation procedure for areas beneath walls and slopes of the Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Earthquake, EIS, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 21

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 … Page 109
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V