TagThird Runway(1098)
-
2001-09-12
PCHB Doc 7881: Declaration of Peter J. Eglick in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay
Declaration by attorney Peter J. Eglick of Helsell Fetterman LLP on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in support of ACC’s motion for stay before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-133. Filed September 12, 2001, opposing Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification and CZMA concurrency statement (Order No. 1996-4-02325) issued August 10, -
2001-09-12
Exhibit 209: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133
Thomas R. Luster, a former 12-year Department of Ecology expert in water quality and wetlands, submitted this declaration to Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board challenging the water quality certification issued for construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Luster, who served as Ecology's senior policy and technical expert for Clean Water Act Section 401 reviews and had personally overseen more than 700 such certifications, was asked to assess whether the project and its certification complied with federal and state water quality standards. His testimony was submitted in support of a request to stay the certification issued on August 10, 2001. -
2001-09-12
EXH AR008048: Declaration of Dr. Peter Willing in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325
Declaration by Dr. Peter Willing, Principal of Water Resources Consulting LLC (Bellingham), filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports ACC’s motion for stay of Ecology’s Section 401 Water Quality Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August -
2001-09-12
EXH AR008132: Declaration of William A. Rozeboom in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — PCHB Case No. 01-133, Third Runway Stormwater and Low Flow Impacts
Declaration of William A. Rozeboom, PE, senior engineer at Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, filed in PCHB Case No. 01-133 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Filed on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in support of a motion for stay of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued -
2001-09-12
PCHB Doc 008218: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, No. 01-133
Declaration of Thomas R. Luster filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster, former senior policy and technical expert at Ecology’s Federal Permits Unit (1989–2001), provides expert testimony on CWA Section 401 water quality certification No. 1996-4-02325 and -
2001-09-11
PCHB Doc 8042: Declaration of Kevin L. Stock in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification and CZMA, Third Runway, Sea-Tac Airport
Declaration by Kevin L. Stock, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed in PCHB Case No. 01-133, in support of ACC’s motion for stay of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001 by Washington Department of Ecology, related to construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Stock -
2001-09-10
EXH AR023886: FW: Summary Runway Stipulated Agreement
A September 2001 internal email summarizes a Stipulated Agreement between the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle regarding the third runway construction at Sea-Tac Airport. The agreement clarifies the scope and duration of water quality certification conditions (401 permit), including perpetual wetland mitigation requirements, 15-year wetland monitoring, and rules governing fill material approval and stormwater management. Key changes also address hydrologic monitoring schedules, buffer requirements, and reporting frequency to ensure environmental protections remain in place during and after construction. -
2001-09-10
EXH AR028013: Third Runway Construction Is a Work in Progress
Port of Seattle webpage (AR028013) describing Third Runway construction progress at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport). Details include delivery of fill material via temporary on/off ramps connecting South 176th Street and Highway 509, construction of retaining walls, stormwater detention pond, timber noise wall, and shoulder widening along SR-509. Contract for 1.9 million cubic yards of -
2001-09-10
EXH AR024551: Letter Jay J. Manning (Marten Brown) to PCHB Presiding Officer — Appeal Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 & Stipulated Agreement Order of Dismissal
In September 2001, attorneys for the Port of Seattle filed an appeal of Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325, issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology for improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including construction of a third runway. Simultaneously, the Port and the Department of Ecology filed a Stipulated Agreement and Agreed Order of Dismissal, resolving the Port's appeal by agreeing to amend the water quality certification. The Port requested that the Pollution Control Hearings Board accept the stipulation, dismiss the Port's appeal, and allow the separate Airport Communities Coalition appeal to proceed using the revised certification. -
2001-09-09
EXH AR023915: Notice of Appeal — §401 CWA Certification & CZMA Concurrence (PCHB No. 01-133)
In September 2001, the Port of Seattle filed a Notice of Appeal before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, challenging conditions attached to Ecology's §401 Clean Water Act certification for the construction of a third parallel runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The appeal document argues that Ecology's certification already fully protects Washington's water resources and that the project had undergone more than a decade of rigorous planning, environmental review, and judicial scrutiny before receiving approval. The filing was prepared by the law firm Foster Pepper & Shefelman and was shared among legal and agency representatives as a confidential, attorney-client privileged communication tied to ongoing settlement discussions.