Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(1855)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-11-13

    EXH AR023669: Memo to Wietfeld & Wang — Info for Questions-To-Port List

    A November 2000 memo from Washington State Department of Ecology's Roger Nye raises concerns that the Port of Seattle failed to adequately identify potential soil and groundwater contamination sites at Sea-Tac Airport, as required by an Agreed Order. Nye outlines four key deficiencies, including the Port's failure to account for historical use of chlorinated solvents in aircraft washing, overlooked fueling facilities, and incomplete identification of contamination sources based on historical operations rather than just historical facilities. The memo calls for a thorough, honest effort to identify all potential contamination areas that could pose risks to nearby drinking water wells and surface waters.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-11-09

    EXH AR046304: Stability Review of RECo 30% Design — Third Runway Embankment Project

    Memorandum dated November 9, 2000 from Barry Chen, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson, P.E. of HNTB (J-4978-30), reviewing RECo’s 30% design for NSA, West, and South MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) walls for the Third Runway Embankment Project at Sea-Tac Airport. Using SLOPE/W limit equilibrium analyses and FLAC displacement-based modeling, Hart Crowser identified marginal
    TagsACC, Construction, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-11-07

    Exhibit 2108: Email Chain — Tom Luster, Paula Ehlers, Chris Gower Regarding Highline Times Misquote on Third Runway Reassignment

    Email chain (AR 033715, ECY00000691) between Tom Luster and supervisor Paula Ehlers, dated November 7, 2000, discussing a November 1, 2000 Highline Times article titled ‘Opponents leery as third runway reviewers changed.’ Luster states he was incompletely quoted by reporter Chris Gower regarding his feelings about being reassigned from the third runway review project —
    TagsACC, Ecology, Highline Times, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 14
  • 2000-10-27

    Exhibit 218: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Draft Meeting Notes, October 27, 2000

    These draft meeting notes from October 27, 2000 document technical negotiations between the Port of Seattle and the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding the 401 Water Quality Permit for Sea-Tac Airport's Third Runway project. The meeting covered key stormwater management topics including detention sizing, base flow impacts, and the Tyee Pond buffer, with participants tracking a master list of technical issues requiring resolution before the permit could be issued. The notes reflect ongoing discussions between agency staff, Port representatives, and engineering consultants to resolve stormwater modeling, hydrology, and environmental compliance questions.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-26

    EXH AR017290: Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick re Sea-Tac Fill Dirt Ground Water Concerns

    Email dated October 26, 2000 from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick regarding Sea-Tac Airport fill material contamination concerns. Yee reports a conversation with Paul Agid explaining Ecology and the public’s concerns about possible groundwater and surface water contamination from fill material, and sampling frequency to quantify soil characteristics. Paul Agid expressed interest in discussing
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-25

    EXH AR034564: Ecology Federal Permits Team Workload Items Memo from Tom L. to Paula

    Memo dated October 25, 2000 from Tom L. to Paula at Washington State Department of Ecology listing initial workload items for the next year. Items include updating Nationwide Permits with Army Corps of Engineers, developing Regional General Permits, investigating 401/CZM rule pros/cons, preparing for legislative session, coordinating on ESA issues, updating the 401/CZM Desk Manual,
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Ecology, ESA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 14
  • 2000-10-25

    EXH AR023741: Draft Memo — Transition 401 Review STIA

    A October 25, 2000 internal memo from Tom Luster to Ann Kenny outlines the transition of the 401 water quality certification review for the Sea-Tac Airport expansion project. It covers key outstanding issues including flow augmentation, water quality BMPs, and Clean Air Act compliance, as well as coordination needs with the Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, and WDFW. The memo also addresses document management, public disclosure requests, and contract administration changes related to the King County Stormwater Review.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-10-24

    Exhibit 2107: Memorandum — Refocusing Work Priorities for Tom Luster

    Memorandum dated October 24, 2000 from Paula Ehlers, Section Manager, to Gordon White, Jeannie Summerhays, Ray Heilwig, and Seatac File, regarding refocusing work priorities for Tom Luster, Senior Policy Lead for federal permitting. Ehlers explains that Tom Luster’s involvement in the SeaTac Third Runway project has prevented him from fulfilling his statewide Section 401 Clean
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 14
  • 2000-10-20

    Exhibit 2206: Hart Crowser Memorandum on Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 Wetland Preservation

    Memorandum dated October 20, 2000 from Michael A.P. Kenrick, P.E. and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson at HNTB Boston, regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland preservation (project J-4978-06). Document provides conceptual design for a proposed drainage swale to protect wetlands in Borrow Area 3 located south of Sea-Tac
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR046044: Sea-Tac Third Runway – Borrow Area 3 Preservation of Wetlands Memorandum

    Memorandum dated October 20, 2000 from Michael A.P. Kenrick, P.E. and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson of HNTB regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland preservation, project J-4978-06, prepared for Port Of Seattle. Covers hydrology sustaining Wetlands 29, B9, 30, B7, B6, and B5 in Borrow Area 3, including
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 … Page 186
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V