Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSAMP(642)

Articles tagged with the Sustainable Airport Master Plan.

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • SAMP EIS comment – aircraft seat capacity estimates pdf
    2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Aircraft Seat Capacity Estimates and Fleet Upgauging in the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement

    Formal SEPA comment filed by Jeffrey Bogen, Des Moines resident, dated May 28, 2026, on the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement. Argues that the SAMP’s assumption of 0.5 percent annual seat-per-departure growth (141 seats in 2023 to 148 seats by 2032) is arithmetically incompatible with the 56 million annual enplanement target at any realistic
    TagsAlaska Air, Delta, Environmental Impact Statement, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Aircraft Seat Capacity Estimates and Fleet Upgauging in the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement

    A Des Moines resident's formal comment on the Seattle-Area Metroplex Environmental Impact Statement argues that Sea-Tac Airport's official planning assumption — that average aircraft size will grow by only 0.5% per year — is mathematically incompatible with the airport's own goal of 56 million annual passengers by 2032. The comment shows that reaching that passenger target under the current assumption would require roughly 880,000 flights per year, far exceeding the airport's infrastructure ceiling of about 517,000 operations. The author contends that airlines like Alaska and Delta are already ordering larger aircraft and expanding international routes at Sea-Tac, meaning faster fleet upgauging is not a worst-case scenario but a necessity for the plan to make sense.
    TagsAlaska Air, Delta, Environmental Impact Statement, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • SAMP EIS comment seating pdf
    2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: SAMP EIS Aircraft Fleet Mix Seat Estimates Assumptions Not Accurate Today

    Formal public comment filed 2026-05-28 by Jeffrey Bogen, Des Moines resident, on the SAMP Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) challenging the accuracy of the SAMP’s aircraft seat estimates and fleet mix assumptions for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport / SEA). Argues that Alaska Airlines’ January 2026 order of 105 Boeing 737-10 narrowbodies and 17 Boeing 787
    TagsAlaska Air, Delta, Environmental Impact Statement, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: SAMP EIS Aircraft Fleet Mix Seat Estimates Assumptions Not Accurate Today

    A Des Moines resident's formal comment on the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement argues that the SAMP's aircraft seat capacity assumptions are now outdated, pointing to major 2026 fleet expansions by Alaska Airlines and Delta that include significantly more and larger widebody aircraft operating from SEA. The comment contends that because larger planes carry more passengers per flight, fewer total aircraft operations would be needed to reach the SAMP's 56 million passenger target, meaning the airport could handle projected growth with less noise impact than the SAMP currently estimates. The author presents revised seat-capacity scenarios suggesting the SAMP's low-growth assumption is internally inconsistent and that updated fleet data should be incorporated into the EIS before final conclusions are drawn.
    TagsAlaska Air, Delta, Environmental Impact Statement, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • SAMP EIS noise comment formatted pdf
    2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement — Health Effects of Aviation Noise: Deficiencies and Corrections

    Formal public comment filed 2026-05-28 by Jeffrey Bogen, Des Moines resident, on the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), challenging the No Significant Impact (NSI) finding on health effects of aviation noise. Bogen argues the SAMP EIS and ME Eagan Consulting report omit key peer-reviewed studies including the WHO Systematic Review Update (2022) on
    TagsDes Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, Health, Noise, SAMP
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement — Health Effects of Aviation Noise: Deficiencies and Corrections

    A Des Moines resident submitted a formal comment arguing that the Seattle-Area Metroplex Environmental Impact Statement (SAMP EIS) significantly underestimates the health risks of aviation noise by omitting key peer-reviewed studies linking aircraft noise to cardiovascular disease, heart structural changes, and sleep disruption. The commenter contends that the EIS relies on outdated and methodologically flawed research, particularly FICAN studies using extrapolated rather than measured data, while ignoring more recent findings from the WHO, the HYENA Project, and a 2025 cardiac MRI study. The comment calls on the FAA to conduct a proper cumulative health effects analysis and require additional noise mitigation measures beyond the current DNL 65 dB contour threshold.
    TagsDes Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, Health, Noise, SAMP
  • 2026-05-27

    Port of Seattle Commission May 26, 2026

    Introduction of SAMP-NTP 2026 05 26 Regular Meeting Packet At almost four hours, the May 26 Port Commission meeting had several lengthy presentations. The longest was not the one of interest to airport communities: the first public briefing on the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects SEPA Draft EIS. The practical outcomes: no required mitigations
    CategoriesNews Stories TagsPort Of Seattle Commission, SAMP, SAMP Draft SEPA EIS
  • Highline forum agenda final 27may2026 pdf
    2026-05-27

    Highline Forum May 27, 2026 – Sustainable Airport Master Plan Update

    2:45pm - Host Update: City of Burien: Sarah Moore, Mayor, City of Burien 2:55pm - SAMP NTP Environmental Update: Steve Rybolt, AV Environment 3:40pm - Highline Schools: Future Ready Overview: Janet Blanford, Director Secondary Success, College & Career Readiness, Highline School District 3:50pm - Port of Seattle Educational Partnerships: Marco Milanese 4:00pm - StART Update: Wendy Reiter
    CategoriesEvents TagsCity of Burien, Highline Forum, Highline Schools, Port Of Seattle, SAMP
  • 2026-05-27

    Highline Forum agenda May 27, 2026

    Agenda for the Highline Forum meeting hosted by the City of Burien with a focus on Sustainable Airport Master Plan Update. The meeting includes public comments, host updates, environmental updates, educational partnerships, and round table discussions.
    TagsCity of Burien, Highline Forum, Highline Schools, Port Of Seattle, SAMP
  • Highline forum agenda final 27may2026 pdf
    2026-05-27

    Highline forum agenda

    Agenda for the Highline Forum meeting hosted by the City of Burien with a focus on Sustainable Airport Master Plan Update. The meeting includes public comments, host updates, environmental updates, educational partnerships, and round table discussions.
    TagsCity of Burien, Highline Forum, Highline Schools, Port Of Seattle, SAMP

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Page 65
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "PSRC Third Runway Decision Process" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V