Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2403)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-13

    EXH 302: Draft Meeting Notes – Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway 401 Permit, Jun 13 2001

    These draft meeting notes from a June 12, 2001 technical meeting cover the Low Flow Analysis conducted as part of the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for Sea-Tac International Airport's Third Runway project. Representatives from the Washington Department of Ecology, King County, the Port of Seattle, and consulting firms discussed the status of hydrological modeling efforts, including HSPF and embankment seepage models, and outlined upcoming deliverables. The group also addressed plans for a mitigation and operational plan to evaluate and offset potential low stream flow impacts caused by the runway project.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-06-12

    EXH AR017654: Draft Meeting Notes — Low Flow Analysis, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway, 401 Permit Decision-Making

    Draft meeting notes from June 12, 2001 status meeting on Low Stream Flow related tasks for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Decision-Making process. Attendees included Ann Kenny and John Drabeck (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Paul Fendt (Parametrix), and Charles Ellingson (Pacific Groundwater Group). Topics covered:
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-12

    EXH AR023827: Draft Meeting Notes — Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway (Jun 12, 2001)

    These draft meeting notes from June 12, 2001 document a technical status meeting between the Washington Department of Ecology, King County, and the Port of Seattle regarding low stream flow analysis for the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway project. The group reviewed progress on hydrological modeling efforts, including HSPF and Hydrus modeling used to assess how runway embankment construction might affect nearby stream flows. Discussions also covered planned mitigation measures such as stormwater retention vaults, upcoming modeling deliverables, and a follow-up conference call that confirmed the Port team's modeling methodology was acceptable and conservative for evaluating embankment seepage.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-06-11

    EXH AR1252: ACC Motion for Voluntary Dismissal — Airport Communities Coalition et al. v. FAA and Port Of Seattle, No. 00-70848

    Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Mark C. Rutzick on behalf of petitioners Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), City of Des Moines, City of Normandy Park, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Tukwila, and Highline School District No. 401 in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 00-70848. Petitioners sought dismissal under
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, ESA, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-06-05

    EXH AR029182: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Technical Meeting Notes, June 5, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for a 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meeting on June 5, 2001 regarding Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Alan Black (HNTB), Paul Fendt and Tom Atkins (Parametrix).
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2001-06-05

    EXH AR 024422: Verbatim RP of Proceedings — Port of Seattle v. RST Enterprises Inc. & King County (June 5, 2001)

    This is a verbatim transcript of a June 5, 2001 King County Superior Court hearing in the case of Port of Seattle versus RST Enterprises, Inc., presided over by Judge Dean S. Lum. The proceedings included testimony from expert witness James C. Kelley, Ph.D. and Jack Dodge, covering direct, cross, and redirect examinations across multiple sessions. The case, which also carried a Washington Supreme Court cause number, likely relates to disputes involving Port of Seattle operations or property matters in the Sea-Tac area.
    TagsACC, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, TranscriptFolderBox 10
  • 2001-06-04

    EXH AR017293: Ecology Internal Emails — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification, Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Internal deliberative emails from Kevin Fitzpatrick (NWRO Water Quality Program Section Manager) to Chung K. Yee, Ann Kenny, Ching-Pi Wang, and others at Washington State Department of Ecology regarding development of acceptable clean fill criteria language for the 401 Water Quality Certification for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway (Sea-Tac Master Plan Improvements project). Emails reference
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-04

    EXH AR017665: PDA Request for 1999 Parametrix Report — Correspondence Between Andrea Grad and Ann Kenny

    Email correspondence (June 4, 2001) from Andrea Grad, paralegal at Helsell Fetterman, to Ann Kenny at Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY), following up on a Public Disclosure Act (PDA) request for Parametrix’s 1999 draft report titled ‘Water Effects Ratio Screening Study of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: Toxicity Evaluation of Site Water.’ The Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-01

    EXH AR017746: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Email chain (June 1, 2001) from Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager, Water Quality Program NWRO, to Ann Kenny and Ching-Pi Wang, cc Raymond Hellwig and Steve Alexander (Ecology), forwarding deliberative draft language for clean fill criteria in the 401 Certification for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway construction. Includes August 24, 2000 email from Fitzpatrick to Tom Luster
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-30

    EXH AR017714: Email and Redline Revisions to Preferential Flowpath Technical Memorandum — Third Runway Construction

    Email from Ching-Pi Wang (Port Of Seattle) to Paul Agid, cc Roger Nye, dated May 30, 2001, transmitting redline edits to the May 8th draft of the preferential ground-water flowpath technical memorandum related to construction of the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Attached redlined memorandum (From Port to Ecology, May 30, 2001) addresses preferential flowpaths
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 … Page 241
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting September 22, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 22: 12:00pm
    17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158
    2026 09 22 rm packet pdf

    Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 4a. Presentation of

    [...]
  • Highline Forum Agenda – September 23, 2026
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 23, 2:30pm - 4:30pm
    City of Des Moines, Police Services Building,
    Highline forum agenda final 23sept2026 pdf

    Highline Forum Agenda Theme: Part 150 Update and PortJobs Overview 2:30pm – Convene Meeting/Introductions Port Co-Chair, Commissioner Mohamed 2:35pm – Public Comments Audience The meeting will be held in person and virtually. Those wishing to provide public comment may: 1) Deliver public comment via email; 2) Deliver public comment via Microsoft Teams; or 3) Deliver

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "apple computers offices in seattle 01" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V