Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006567: Declaration of Roger Pearce — §401 Water Quality Certification for STIA Third Runway

    Declaration by Roger Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC representing Port Of Seattle, filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches Exhibit A: Washington Department of Ecology §401 Water Quality Certification (Order No. 1996-4-02325 Amended-1) issued September 21, 2001, for
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006616: Second Declaration of C. Linn Gould Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay — PCHB No. 01-133

    Second Declaration of C. Linn Gould (Risk Assessor, soil scientist, BA geology, MS soil science) filed on behalf of Port Of Seattle opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay in PCHB No. 01-133. Gould rebuts ACC’s alleged ‘errors’ in the 401 Certification fill criteria for the Third Runway embankment, addressing MTCA Method A cleanup
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007082: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    Reply declaration of Tom Luster filed October 8, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, case nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Addresses Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007119: Declaration of William A. Rozeboom in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of William A. Rozeboom filed October 8, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001. Rozeboom
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007184: Declaration of Robert Sheckler in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Robert Sheckler, Mayor Pro Tem and City Councilmember of Des Moines WA and Chair of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Executive Committee, filed in PCHB cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160 in support of ACC’s reply on motion for stay of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued by Washington State
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007189: Declaration of Dyanne Sheldon in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Declaration of Dyanne Sheldon, environmental scientist and wetland ecologist, filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006735: ACC’s Motion for Permission to File Overlength Reply Brief — PCHB Nos. 01-133 and 01-160

    Motion filed October 8, 2001 by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) via Helsell Fetterman LLP (Kevin L. Stock, WSBA #14541) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), State of Washington, in Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. ACC requests permission to file a 46-page overlength reply brief (exceeding the Board’s 30-page limit by 16 pages) in response
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 007256: Declaration of Dr. John Strand in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Dr. John Strand, Principal Biologist for Columbia Biological Assessments, filed in PCHB cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, in support of ACC’s motion to stay Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) issued by Washington Department of Ecology for USACOE Public Notice 1996-4-02325 regarding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Strand addresses metals exceedances — copper,
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006737: ACC Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply memorandum filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, in support of ACC’s motion for a stay of Washington Department of Ecology Section 401 Clean Water Act certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001, for Port
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007327: Declaration of Greg Wingard in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Greg Wingard (Executive Director, Waste Action Project) filed October 8, 2001, in Environmental Pollution Control Hearings Board cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports ACC’s motion for stay of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port Of Seattle Letter to Secretary Buttigieg Supporting Delta Air Lines SEA-DCA Flight Application" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V